RallyIQ

Game plan

Pete Sampras v Boris Becker

Every number combines what Pete Sampras does well with what Boris Becker allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Pete Sampras wins, best of 3 82%90%: 73%–89% · best of 5: 87%
Serve points won 74.6% / 66.7% Pete / Boris · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 76%serve 72.1% / 66.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Pete Sampras's record against Boris Becker's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.7 on serve, −0.9 on return vs expectation (5641 points); head-to-head: +3.1 on serve, +0.1 on return vs expectation (2708 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerPeteBoris
Direction choice+0.37 ±0.04
better than 99%
+0.03 ±0.05
better than 65%
Shot selection+0.63 ±0.06
better than 96%
+0.33 ±0.11
better than 83%
Execution−0.32 ±0.18
better than 52%
−0.37 ±0.22
better than 50%
Points left on the table3.11 ±0.10
lower than 15%
3.75 ±0.16
lower than 5%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Pete Sampras serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPete winsv BorisMatchupOptimal
Wide42%80%73%80.4%±1.855% ▲
Body6%67%66%69.0%±4.20% ▼
T52%85%72%83.2%±1.645% ▼

Optimal v Boris Becker: +0.3±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPete winsv BorisMatchupOptimal
Wide42%80%70%78.1%±1.955% ▲
Body6%71%61%69.5%±4.70% ▼
T52%79%71%78.5%±2.045% ▼

Optimal v Boris Becker: +0.1±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Boris Becker serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBoris winsv PeteMatchupOptimal
Wide41%78%76%80.7%±1.854% ▲
Body9%70%65%71.0%±3.80% ▼
T50%81%73%79.2%±1.846% ▼

Optimal v Pete Sampras: +0.6±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBoris winsv PeteMatchupOptimal
Wide49%78%72%77.0%±1.962% ▲
Body12%71%65%72.3%±3.90% ▼
T39%75%74%76.8%±2.238% ▼

Optimal v Pete Sampras: +0.3±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Pete Sampras returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
FH through the middle41%+4.3−2.4−1.6+0.3±1.2
FH crosscourt34%+5.5−1.8+1.5+5.2±2.0
FH down the line15%+1.7+1.8−0.8+2.7±2.4
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2+2.1+0.1−2.0±2.2
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+4.9+2.2+2.8±2.7
BH slice inside-in0%+3.4+2.8+1.7+8.0±2.3

Lean BH slice inside-in: +5.6±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (3531 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
BH slice through the middle29%−4.2+2.3−1.9−3.7±1.0
BH slice crosscourt25%+0.5+4.0+1.7+6.3±1.6
BH through the middle18%+6.4−1.8−4.2+0.4±1.2
BH crosscourt13%+8.8+0.5−3.6+5.7±1.9
BH slice down the line8%−8.4+4.6+5.3+1.5±2.2

Lean BH slice crosscourt: +4.8±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (5404 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
FH crosscourt37%−0.2+2.3+2.1+4.1±2.6
FH through the middle30%−3.5−1.8−1.2−6.4±1.7
FH down the line17%−1.8+0.3+2.0+0.5±3.2
BH through the middle4%+0.1+0.3−1.8−1.4±1.6
BH slice through the middle3%−6.9−1.9+0.5−8.3±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.1±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (1157 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
BH through the middle26%−2.9−0.3−1.8−5.0±1.0
BH crosscourt24%+1.0−0.1+1.8+2.7±1.4
BH slice crosscourt20%−4.0+1.5+2.1−0.4±1.3
BH down the line10%−0.2−0.5+0.9+0.2±3.0
BH slice through the middle8%−11.3+2.6+0.5−8.2±1.6
FH inside-out5%+1.0+1.5+2.0+4.5±2.5

Lean FH inside-out: +5.9±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (4084 returns charted)

Boris Becker returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PeteValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3−1.3−3.1−0.2±1.1
FH down the line34%+1.7+2.1−0.2+3.5±1.9
FH crosscourt19%+5.5+2.7−2.1+6.1±2.3
FH slice through the middle2%−4.2+2.6−1.8−3.5±2.4
FH slice down the line1%−4.3−1.1+2.9−2.5±3.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (2642 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PeteValue
BH through the middle29%+6.4−2.2−5.0−0.8±1.1
BH slice through the middle20%−4.2+3.0−3.3−4.5±1.2
BH down the line18%+4.2+0.1−6.0−1.7±2.4
BH slice crosscourt15%+0.5+5.9−3.7+2.7±1.7
BH crosscourt12%+8.8+1.6−1.1+9.3±1.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +9.5±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (3917 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PeteValue
FH through the middle36%−3.5+0.8−1.4−4.1±1.7
FH down the line32%−1.8+2.2−0.9−0.5±2.9
FH crosscourt28%−0.2+2.8−0.7+1.8±3.0
BH slice through the middle1%−6.9+0.5−0.2−6.6±1.6
BH inside-in1%+2.5+2.9+1.1+6.5±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.1±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (747 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PeteValue
BH through the middle26%−2.9−1.9−2.1−6.9±1.1
BH slice crosscourt21%−4.0+3.0+1.0−0.1±1.5
BH crosscourt19%+1.0+6.4+1.1+8.5±1.5
BH down the line13%−0.2−2.4−4.0−6.7±3.0
BH slice through the middle10%−11.3+3.9−0.2−7.6±1.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +10.6±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (2680 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Pete Sampras

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their backhand · rally+15.3±6.7+14.6+0.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+14.4±4.6+12.1+2.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1+10.4±4.8+7.9+2.5
BH slice to their forehand · return+10.3±3.6+4.4+5.9
BH slice to their backhand · serve +1+9.8±3.5+4.0+5.8
FH to their forehand · return+8.9±3.7+4.4+4.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return +1−10.6±3.0−2.8−7.7
BH to the middle · rally−9.4±2.8−4.4−5.0
FH to the middle · return +1−7.5±3.5−5.2−2.2
BH to the middle · return−6.6±1.5−4.0−2.6
BH lob to their backhand · return +1−6.3±5.9−1.0−5.3

Boris Becker

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · serve +1+11.0±3.3+6.8+4.3
FH volley to their forehand · rally+9.8±6.9+9.0+0.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+9.6±4.0+8.8+0.7
FH to their forehand · rally+8.5±4.0+8.1+0.5
FH to their backhand · return +1+8.4±4.3+3.7+4.8
BH slice to their forehand · serve +1+8.4±5.3+3.9+4.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return +1−13.3±3.1−7.5−5.8
FH to the middle · rally−8.7±3.1−4.3−4.5
FH volley to their backhand · rally−8.7±7.1+0.3−9.0
FH to the middle · return +1−6.8±3.6−1.1−5.8
BH to the middle · rally−6.7±2.7−3.2−3.4

Against Boris Becker-like opponents

Pete Sampras vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–69.8%35.8%
Players most similar to Boris Becker28 71.5%34.4%
Boris Becker (charted head-to-head)13 71.0%35.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Tim Henman, Mark Philippoussis, Todd Martin, Richard Krajicek, Michael Stich, Malivai Washington, Guy Forget, Brad Gilbert, John Mcenroe. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head