RallyIQ

Game plan

Pierre Hugues Herbert v Zizou Bergs

Every number combines what Pierre Hugues Herbert does well with what Zizou Bergs allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Pierre Hugues Herbert wins, best of 3 61%90%: 33%–84% · best of 5: 64%
Serve points won 66.5% / 64.3% Pierre / Zizou · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 60%serve 66.3% / 64.3%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Pierre Hugues Herbert's record against Zizou Bergs's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.4 on serve, +0.5 on return vs expectation (466 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerPierreZizou
Direction choice+0.23 ±0.09
better than 96%
−0.08 ±0.07
better than 36%
Shot selection+0.64 ±0.24
better than 97%
+0.25 ±0.19
better than 75%
Execution−1.76 ±0.85
better than 6%
−1.10 ±0.72
better than 22%
Points left on the table2.66 ±0.20
lower than 42%
2.64 ±0.13
lower than 46%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Pierre Hugues Herbert −1.27, Zizou Bergs −1.36. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Pierre Hugues Herbert serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPierre winsv ZizouMatchupOptimal
Wide45%71%73%71.6%±6.737% ▼
Body5%55%63%54.9%±15.50% ▼
T50%79%73%77.6%±6.463% ▲

Optimal v Zizou Bergs: +1.0±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPierre winsv ZizouMatchupOptimal
Wide56%77%74%77.6%±6.269% ▲
Body6%69%66%72.1%±12.60% ▼
T38%71%77%76.6%±6.831% ▼

Optimal v Zizou Bergs: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Zizou Bergs serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowZizou winsv PierreMatchupOptimal
Wide45%75%74%76.1%±6.343% ▼
Body11%68%66%70.4%±11.00% ▼
T44%76%75%76.7%±6.557% ▲

Optimal v Pierre Hugues Herbert: +0.8±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowZizou winsv PierreMatchupOptimal
Wide48%72%73%72.2%±7.161% ▲
Body9%67%73%75.9%±11.20% ▼
T43%65%73%66.9%±8.039% ▼

Optimal v Pierre Hugues Herbert: +0.3±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +5.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Pierre Hugues Herbert returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ZizouValue
FH through the middle33%+4.3−3.2−2.1−1.0±2.9
FH crosscourt22%+5.5−2.4+3.4+6.6±4.4
FH down the line20%+1.7−0.6±0.0+1.0±4.5
FH slice crosscourt11%−4.3+1.4±0.0−3.0±1.9
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.5−1.1−5.9±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.4±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (255 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ZizouValue
BH through the middle34%+6.4−2.2−2.0+2.2±2.7
BH crosscourt21%+8.8+0.7+1.7+11.2±3.5
BH down the line15%+4.2−0.9+0.9+4.2±4.6
BH slice crosscourt13%+0.5+0.6−0.1+1.0±3.0
BH slice through the middle13%−4.2−0.4−1.3−6.0±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.4±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (271 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ZizouValue
FH through the middle45%−3.5+0.7−0.1−2.8±2.8
FH crosscourt30%−0.2+0.1+1.0+0.8±4.1
FH down the line25%−1.8−1.4−4.5−7.7±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.8±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (71 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ZizouValue
BH crosscourt35%+1.0−3.3+0.1−2.1±3.2
BH through the middle34%−2.9−3.0−1.4−7.3±2.5
BH down the line20%−0.2−3.5±0.0−3.7±4.9
FH through the middle6%−2.9+0.3−0.1−2.6±2.0
FH inside-in4%+0.6−0.3+1.0+1.2±3.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.0±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (161 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Zizou Bergs returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PierreValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.1+0.3+4.7±2.7
FH down the line26%+1.7−3.0−0.2−1.5±4.4
FH crosscourt13%+5.5+2.7−2.6+5.5±4.4
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2−0.1−1.0−5.3±2.1
FH slice crosscourt3%−4.3−0.5+0.4−4.5±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.3±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (344 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PierreValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4−0.9−4.2+1.3±2.7
BH crosscourt21%+8.8−1.6−1.1+6.1±3.6
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2−1.0−2.5−7.8±2.5
BH down the line8%+4.2+0.3+0.3+4.8±4.5
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+0.1+0.7−7.5±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.7±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (306 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PierreValue
FH through the middle57%−3.5−1.7−3.0−8.1±2.9
FH down the line29%−1.8−0.2−3.1−5.1±4.6
FH crosscourt14%−0.2+0.6−1.3−0.9±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.3±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (124 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PierreValue
BH crosscourt45%+1.0−1.7−1.0−1.6±3.1
BH through the middle40%−2.9−3.3−3.4−9.7±2.4
BH down the line5%−0.2+1.0+0.8+1.6±4.4
BH slice through the middle4%−11.3−0.7−0.1−12.1±1.8
FH through the middle4%−2.9+0.3−3.0−5.6±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.6±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (193 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Pierre Hugues Herbert

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.5±3.4+1.5+0.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.8±3.8+3.0−1.2
FH to their forehand · return+1.6±4.5−1.9+3.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally+1.6±2.5+0.8+0.9
FH to their forehand · return +1+0.2±4.2−0.3+0.5
FH to their backhand · return +1±0.0±4.1−0.3+0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−8.3±3.0−3.4−4.9
BH to their forehand · rally−6.1±4.4−3.3−2.7
FH to their backhand · return−5.4±3.9−2.5−2.9
BH to the middle · return−4.2±2.2−2.0−2.1
FH to the middle · return−3.5±2.4−1.5−1.9

Zizou Bergs

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1+1.7±3.2+0.3+1.4
FH to the middle · serve +1+0.7±2.7−1.7+2.4
BH to their backhand · return +1+0.4±3.4−2.3+2.7
FH to their forehand · return±0.0±4.5+2.6−2.6
BH to their backhand · rally−0.6±2.5−1.1+0.5
FH to their backhand · rally−0.9±2.7−0.9±0.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return−7.6±2.2−2.6−5.1
FH to their backhand · return−4.0±3.8−2.2−1.8
BH slice to the middle · return−3.6±2.5−1.2−2.4
BH to their backhand · return−2.5±2.9−0.9−1.6
FH to the middle · return−2.4±2.3−1.2−1.2

Against Zizou Bergs-like opponents

Pierre Hugues Herbert vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–65.0%30.5%
Players most similar to Zizou Bergs2 67.2%32.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Ben Shelton, Tallon Griekspoor, Zhizhen Zhang, Felix Auger Aliassime, Alexei Popyrin, Roman Safiullin, Otto Virtanen, Lucas Pouille, Sam Querrey. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.