RallyIQ

Game plan

Richard Krajicek v Lorenzo Musetti

Every number combines what Richard Krajicek does well with what Lorenzo Musetti allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Richard Krajicek wins, best of 3 54%90%: 40%–67% · best of 5: 55%
Serve points won 66.2% / 65.4% Richard / Lorenzo · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 54%serve 66.2% / 65.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Richard Krajicek's record against Lorenzo Musetti's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerRichardLorenzo
Direction choice−0.02 ±0.09
better than 52%
−0.02 ±0.04
better than 50%
Shot selection+0.82 ±0.24
better than 98%
−0.57 ±0.10
better than 9%
Execution−1.17 ±0.53
better than 19%
+0.48 ±0.22
better than 83%
Points left on the table4.60 ±0.22
lower than 1%
2.74 ±0.06
lower than 35%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Richard Krajicek serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRichard winsv LorenzoMatchupOptimal
Wide39%84%72%83.5%±3.152% ▲
Body9%69%61%66.6%±7.60% ▼
T52%81%71%77.8%±3.548% ▼

Optimal v Lorenzo Musetti: +1.0±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +4.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRichard winsv LorenzoMatchupOptimal
Wide45%81%68%77.5%±3.940% ▼
Body8%59%63%58.1%±8.90% ▼
T47%79%71%77.9%±3.660% ▲

Optimal v Lorenzo Musetti: +0.9±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Lorenzo Musetti serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowLorenzo winsv RichardMatchupOptimal
Wide41%70%76%73.2%±4.038% ▼
Body9%64%63%63.5%±7.90% ▼
T49%72%79%76.8%±3.462% ▲

Optimal v Richard Krajicek: +0.9±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowLorenzo winsv RichardMatchupOptimal
Wide55%69%79%75.3%±3.568% ▲
Body8%61%62%59.7%±8.40% ▼
T37%69%73%70.2%±4.532% ▼

Optimal v Richard Krajicek: +0.9±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Richard Krajicek returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3−1.3+0.8+3.8±1.9
FH down the line32%+1.7+1.6−2.1+1.2±3.1
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+1.9+0.4+7.8±3.5
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2−0.7+0.4−4.6±2.1
FH slice down the line2%−4.3+0.7+1.1−2.5±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.5±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (619 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
BH slice through the middle27%−4.2±0.0−0.8−5.0±1.9
BH through the middle21%+6.4−4.8+0.5+2.1±1.8
BH slice crosscourt19%+0.5+2.0−1.0+1.5±2.6
BH down the line12%+4.2−4.6−0.7−1.1±3.8
BH slice down the line12%−8.4+4.2−0.5−4.7±3.4
BH crosscourt9%+8.8±0.0−0.9+7.9±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.5±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (875 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
FH through the middle41%−3.5−2.9−0.8−7.1±2.3
FH down the line32%−1.8−2.1−0.5−4.4±4.0
FH crosscourt23%−0.2+0.6+1.1+1.4±3.8
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7+0.9−1.7−13.4±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.9±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (149 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
BH slice crosscourt22%−4.0+0.8−1.1−4.4±2.4
BH through the middle18%−2.9−2.7+0.2−5.3±1.9
BH slice through the middle15%−11.3+0.2−0.9−12.0±2.3
BH slice down the line14%−9.3+0.6±0.0−8.7±3.0
BH crosscourt12%+1.0−0.6−0.7−0.3±2.5
FH inside-in4%+0.6+3.2+1.1+4.8±3.7

Lean FH inside-in: +9.6±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (597 returns charted)

Lorenzo Musetti returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RichardValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3−0.5−1.5+2.3±1.9
FH down the line24%+1.7−1.4+1.1+1.3±3.4
FH slice through the middle15%−4.2−0.4−0.9−5.5±1.6
FH crosscourt10%+5.5+2.3−0.1+7.7±3.6
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+0.2±0.0−4.1±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.0±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (2257 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RichardValue
BH slice through the middle27%−4.2+1.4−2.4−5.3±1.8
BH through the middle25%+6.4+1.1−1.7+5.8±1.9
BH crosscourt20%+8.8+1.4−2.0+8.2±2.6
BH slice crosscourt11%+0.5−0.6−1.7−1.8±2.6
BH down the line9%+4.2±0.0−2.4+1.8±4.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.8±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (2587 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RichardValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.1−2.2−4.7±2.3
FH down the line25%−1.8−1.0+5.0+2.3±4.3
FH crosscourt23%−0.2−1.2−0.6−2.0±4.1
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7−0.7−0.1−13.5±1.9
FH slice down the line2%−9.4+1.2−0.5−8.8±2.3

Lean FH down the line: +4.9±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (600 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RichardValue
BH through the middle33%−2.9+1.0−2.0−3.9±1.5
BH crosscourt27%+1.0+1.4+3.1+5.5±2.1
BH down the line14%−0.2−1.8+2.4+0.4±4.0
FH through the middle10%−2.9+1.2−2.2−3.9±2.1
FH inside-out6%+1.0−1.1+5.0+4.9±3.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.2±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (1827 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Richard Krajicek

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally+6.5±7.4+6.2+0.3
FH to their forehand · return+3.4±4.4+2.9+0.4
BH volley to their backhand · rally+2.4±7.8+6.3−3.9
BH slice to their backhand · return+1.3±2.9+2.1−0.9
FH to their backhand · rally+0.1±3.4+0.6−0.5
FH to their backhand · return−0.1±3.2+2.3−2.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1−12.4±6.9−9.9−2.5
FH volley to their backhand · rally−11.7±7.9−13.8+2.1
FH to their forehand · return +1−11.7±4.1−7.3−4.4
FH volley to their backhand · serve +1−9.3±6.2−4.3−5.0
FH to their forehand · rally−8.6±4.0−5.2−3.4

Lorenzo Musetti

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1+8.1±3.4+3.5+4.6
FH to their backhand · return+6.9±3.8−1.3+8.2
FH to their backhand · return +1+6.4±4.4+0.1+6.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.3±4.0+0.9+2.4
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1+3.2±7.6−0.3+3.5
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.1±3.2−0.1+2.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally−5.8±7.8−7.5+1.7
BH to their forehand · return +1−4.9±5.1−2.4−2.5
BH to the middle · return−4.7±1.8−0.3−4.4
BH to their forehand · rally−4.2±4.9+0.1−4.3
BH slice to the middle · return−3.8±2.5+1.0−4.8

Against Lorenzo Musetti-like opponents

Richard Krajicek vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–67.1%32.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Novak Djokovic, Grigor Dimitrov, Marton Fucsovics, Pedro Martinez, Dusan Lajovic, Dominic Thiem, Robin Haase, Philipp Kohlschreiber, Guillermo Garcia Lopez. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.