RallyIQ

Game plan

Sebastian Korda v Jack Draper

Every number combines what Sebastian Korda does well with what Jack Draper allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Sebastian Korda wins, best of 3 14%90%: 3%–40% · best of 5: 9%
Serve points won 64.3% / 73.5% Sebastian / Jack · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 16%serve 63.3% / 71.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Sebastian Korda's record against Jack Draper's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +3.2 on serve, −5.8 on return vs expectation (1380 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerSebastianJack
Direction choice+0.27 ±0.03
better than 97%
+0.10 ±0.07
better than 81%
Shot selection+0.11 ±0.10
better than 66%
+0.26 ±0.13
better than 77%
Execution−0.70 ±0.32
better than 37%
+1.21 ±0.65
better than 98%
Points left on the table2.12 ±0.07
lower than 98%
2.75 ±0.11
lower than 35%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Sebastian Korda −0.35, Jack Draper +1.38. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Sebastian Korda serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSebastian winsv JackMatchupOptimal
Wide44%70%72%69.5%±4.735% ▼
Body5%60%62%58.3%±12.30% ▼
T52%74%71%70.8%±5.165% ▲

Optimal v Jack Draper: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSebastian winsv JackMatchupOptimal
Wide56%71%75%73.1%±4.743% ▼
Body3%67%66%70.0%±12.33%
T41%72%71%71.1%±5.154% ▲

Optimal v Jack Draper: +0.1±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Jack Draper serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJack winsv SebastianMatchupOptimal
Wide41%71%77%75.9%±4.754% ▲
Body5%60%61%57.4%±11.70% ▼
T54%73%76%74.5%±4.546% ▼

Optimal v Sebastian Korda: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJack winsv SebastianMatchupOptimal
Wide51%76%74%77.9%±4.264% ▲
Body6%65%68%69.7%±10.40% ▼
T43%73%75%76.3%±4.836% ▼

Optimal v Sebastian Korda: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Sebastian Korda returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−1.1+2.1+5.3±2.3
FH crosscourt26%+5.5−3.8+2.4+4.1±3.8
FH down the line14%+1.7−3.5+0.9−1.0±4.3
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.8±0.0−6.0±2.3
FH slice crosscourt3%−4.3−2.1−1.8−8.3±2.8

Lean FH through the middle: +2.5±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (948 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
BH through the middle36%+6.4−0.3+1.9+7.9±2.1
BH crosscourt33%+8.8−2.1+1.2+7.9±3.0
BH slice through the middle11%−4.2−2.6−0.8−7.6±2.4
BH down the line10%+4.2−3.3−0.2+0.7±4.5
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−4.1+1.8−1.9±2.9

Lean BH through the middle: +3.7±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (886 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
FH through the middle49%−3.5+2.0−1.0−2.5±2.6
FH crosscourt35%−0.2−1.0+1.5+0.3±4.2
FH down the line14%−1.8+2.4+1.0+1.6±4.7
BH inside-in2%+2.5−1.7−2.7−1.9±2.5

Lean FH down the line: +2.5±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (271 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
BH crosscourt46%+1.0−1.8−2.7−3.5±2.6
BH through the middle38%−2.9+0.7+0.6−1.6±2.0
BH down the line12%−0.2−3.7−3.4−7.4±5.0
FH through the middle2%−2.9−0.7−1.0−4.6±2.1
BH slice through the middle2%−11.3−1.7±0.0−13.0±1.2

Lean BH through the middle: +1.8±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (565 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Jack Draper returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SebastianValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.3+1.5+6.0±2.2
FH crosscourt27%+5.5+0.1−0.6+5.0±3.8
FH down the line14%+1.7−1.2+1.4+1.8±4.1
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2+0.9+0.6−2.7±2.3
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+1.5−1.3−4.1±2.5

Lean FH through the middle: +1.7±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (427 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SebastianValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+1.0−0.4+7.0±1.9
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.6−2.1+5.1±3.2
BH down the line12%+4.2+2.7+1.7+8.6±4.0
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−1.0−1.3−6.4±2.3
BH slice down the line3%−8.4+0.6+0.7−7.1±3.3

Lean BH down the line: +3.9±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (581 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SebastianValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−0.7+0.6−3.6±2.6
FH crosscourt31%−0.2−0.3−1.0−1.5±4.3
FH down the line18%−1.8+3.0+0.7+1.9±4.4
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7−2.1−0.2−14.9±1.8

Lean FH down the line: +4.4±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (179 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SebastianValue
BH through the middle45%−2.9+2.0+0.2−0.7±1.9
BH crosscourt27%+1.0−1.7−0.6−1.3±3.0
FH through the middle9%−2.9+1.5+0.6−0.7±2.2
BH down the line8%−0.2+0.3−0.1±0.0±4.2
FH inside-in6%+0.6−0.3−1.0−0.7±4.1

Lean BH down the line: +0.7±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (412 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Sebastian Korda

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1+5.8±5.4+3.7+2.1
BH to the middle · serve +1+5.2±3.1+5.3−0.1
BH to the middle · return+4.5±3.1+3.0+1.5
FH to their forehand · return +1+4.2±4.8+2.3+1.9
FH to their backhand · return +1+4.0±5.5+0.6+3.4
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.6±3.1+2.4+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1−4.8±3.8−0.7−4.1
BH to their backhand · return−4.4±4.5−1.8−2.6
FH slice to the middle · rally−3.7±3.0−1.9−1.8
BH slice to the middle · rally−2.9±3.2−1.5−1.4
BH to their forehand · return−2.9±5.8−3.2+0.3

Jack Draper

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+5.4±5.6+6.7−1.3
BH to their backhand · serve +1+5.2±4.4+6.1−0.9
BH to the middle · return +1+4.5±3.4+2.7+1.8
BH to their forehand · serve +1+4.4±6.1+4.2+0.2
BH to their forehand · rally+4.3±5.3+1.7+2.6
FH to the middle · rally+4.0±2.6+1.2+2.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1−3.9±5.8−1.9−2.0
FH to their backhand · rally−2.5±4.2−1.1−1.3
FH to their forehand · rally−0.7±4.4−1.0+0.4
FH to their forehand · return−0.4±6.1+3.3−3.7
BH to their backhand · rally+0.3±3.5+1.4−1.1

Against Jack Draper-like opponents

Sebastian Korda vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.8%34.0%
Players most similar to Jack Draper8 67.1%25.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Hubert Hurkacz, Gael Monfils, Novak Djokovic, Taylor Fritz, Arthur Cazaux, Borna Coric, David Goffin, Marcos Baghdatis, Nicolas Almagro. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.