RallyIQ

Game plan

Zizou Bergs v Aleksandar Kovacevic

Every number combines what Zizou Bergs does well with what Aleksandar Kovacevic allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Zizou Bergs wins, best of 3 39%90%: 13%–72% · best of 5: 37%
Serve points won 65.4% / 67.6% Zizou / Aleksandar · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 40%serve 65.7% / 67.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Zizou Bergs's record against Aleksandar Kovacevic's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −5.5 on serve, +4.3 on return vs expectation (229 points); head-to-head: +3.4 on serve, −3.2 on return vs expectation (128 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerZizouAleksandar
Direction choice−0.08 ±0.07
better than 36%
−0.12 ±0.10
better than 26%
Shot selection+0.25 ±0.19
better than 75%
−0.31 ±0.25
better than 22%
Execution−1.10 ±0.72
better than 22%
−0.76 ±0.71
better than 34%
Points left on the table2.64 ±0.13
lower than 46%
2.66 ±0.17
lower than 43%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Zizou Bergs serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowZizou winsv AleksandarMatchupOptimal
Wide45%75%77%79.4%±6.543% ▼
Body11%68%63%68.1%±11.80% ▼
T44%76%80%81.1%±6.357% ▲

Optimal v Aleksandar Kovacevic: +0.9±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowZizou winsv AleksandarMatchupOptimal
Wide48%72%73%71.9%±8.244% ▼
Body9%67%64%67.5%±12.90% ▼
T43%65%74%67.9%±8.356% ▲

Optimal v Aleksandar Kovacevic: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Aleksandar Kovacevic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAleksandar winsv ZizouMatchupOptimal
Wide43%74%73%74.3%±6.936% ▼
Body5%67%63%67.5%±14.80% ▼
T51%79%73%76.9%±6.864% ▲

Optimal v Zizou Bergs: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAleksandar winsv ZizouMatchupOptimal
Wide44%77%74%77.5%±7.245%
Body5%66%66%69.3%±14.20% ▼
T51%75%77%79.7%±6.255% ▲

Optimal v Zizou Bergs: +0.2±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Zizou Bergs returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AleksandarValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.1−1.5+2.9±2.8
FH down the line26%+1.7−3.0−3.5−4.8±4.4
FH crosscourt13%+5.5+2.7−3.8+4.4±4.3
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2−0.1−1.1−5.5±2.2
FH slice crosscourt3%−4.3−0.5±0.0−4.8±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.0±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (344 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AleksandarValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4−0.9−1.0+4.5±2.7
BH crosscourt21%+8.8−1.6−1.0+6.2±3.6
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2−1.0−1.0−6.2±2.4
BH down the line8%+4.2+0.3−3.3+1.2±4.3
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+0.1−0.7−8.9±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.7±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (306 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AleksandarValue
FH through the middle57%−3.5−1.7+1.5−3.6±2.9
FH down the line29%−1.8−0.2+1.2−0.8±4.7
FH crosscourt14%−0.2+0.6−4.0−3.6±4.1

Lean FH down the line: +2.0±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (124 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AleksandarValue
BH crosscourt45%+1.0−1.7−1.3−1.9±3.2
BH through the middle40%−2.9−3.3+0.6−5.7±2.5
BH down the line5%−0.2+1.0+2.5+3.4±4.0
BH slice through the middle4%−11.3−0.7±0.0−12.0±1.1
FH through the middle4%−2.9+0.3+1.5−1.1±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.5±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (193 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Aleksandar Kovacevic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ZizouValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3−2.1−2.1+0.1±2.9
FH down the line20%+1.7+2.6±0.0+4.2±4.5
FH crosscourt18%+5.5−0.7+3.4+8.3±4.4
FH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.7−1.1−6.1±2.1
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−2.3+0.6−6.0±2.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.5±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (164 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ZizouValue
BH slice through the middle34%−4.2−1.9−1.3−7.4±2.5
BH through the middle19%+6.4+0.7−2.0+5.0±2.7
BH slice crosscourt16%+0.5−0.3−0.1+0.1±3.0
BH crosscourt13%+8.8+1.5+1.7+12.1±3.4
BH slice down the line13%−8.4+1.1−0.4−7.6±3.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +12.7±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (167 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ZizouValue
BH through the middle27%−2.9−0.6−1.4−4.9±2.5
FH through the middle27%−2.9−0.4−0.1−3.3±2.3
BH crosscourt14%+1.0+0.3+0.1+1.5±3.1
FH inside-out13%+1.0+0.2−4.5−3.3±3.5
BH down the line11%−0.2−4.1±0.0−4.3±4.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.4±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (132 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Zizou Bergs

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.0±4.2+2.9+0.2
BH to their forehand · rally+2.5±5.3+2.7−0.1
FH to the middle · rally+1.3±3.1+1.6−0.3
BH to the middle · rally+0.3±2.6−0.9+1.1
FH to their backhand · return±0.0±5.0+1.9−1.9
FH to their backhand · rally−0.1±4.1−1.8+1.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1−5.0±4.4−1.5−3.4
FH to the middle · serve +1−2.2±3.3−0.6−1.5
BH to the middle · return−2.1±3.1−0.9−1.2
BH to their backhand · return−1.8±4.3+0.2−2.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1−1.6±4.4−0.8−0.8

Aleksandar Kovacevic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1+4.3±4.4+1.9+2.4
FH to the middle · serve +1+2.8±3.4+0.2+2.6
FH to their forehand · return+2.1±5.8−1.0+3.1
FH to their backhand · serve +1+0.9±4.5+0.2+0.7
BH slice to their backhand · rally+0.6±2.6−0.3+0.9
FH to their forehand · rally+0.4±4.2−1.0+1.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−7.1±4.1−2.4−4.7
BH to their backhand · serve +1−6.0±4.2−4.9−1.1
FH to the middle · return +1−3.0±2.8−1.6−1.4
FH to the middle · return−2.7±3.3−1.5−1.2
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.4±5.5−2.1−0.3

Against Aleksandar Kovacevic-like opponents

Zizou Bergs vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–64.4%33.6%
Players most similar to Aleksandar Kovacevic1 56.6%35.3%
Aleksandar Kovacevic (charted head-to-head)1 67.2%31.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Botic Van De Zandschulp, Zhizhen Zhang, Ethan Quinn, Felix Auger Aliassime, Mackenzie Mcdonald, Lucas Pouille, Tim Van Rijthoven, Vasek Pospisil. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head