RallyIQ

Game plan

Alex De Minaur v Pedro Martinez

Every number combines what Alex De Minaur does well with what Pedro Martinez allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Alex De Minaur wins, best of 3 97%90%: 86%–100% · best of 5: 99%
Serve points won 66.8% / 52.2% Alex / Pedro · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 96%serve 66.2% / 52.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Alex De Minaur's record against Pedro Martinez's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.6 on serve, +1.1 on return vs expectation (1809 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerAlexPedro
Direction choice−0.25 ±0.03
better than 9%
−0.06 ±0.08
better than 43%
Shot selection+0.19 ±0.07
better than 72%
−0.06 ±0.23
better than 46%
Execution+0.34 ±0.21
better than 80%
+0.23 ±0.43
better than 77%
Points left on the table2.56 ±0.06
lower than 54%
2.66 ±0.12
lower than 43%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Alex De Minaur +2.15, Pedro Martinez +1.28. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Alex De Minaur serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlex winsv PedroMatchupOptimal
Wide42%72%75%74.6%±4.142%
Body17%64%70%70.1%±7.63% ▼
T41%75%76%76.0%±4.155% ▲

Optimal v Pedro Martinez: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlex winsv PedroMatchupOptimal
Wide44%73%71%71.4%±4.544%
Body17%62%56%55.7%±8.64% ▼
T39%68%73%69.2%±5.152% ▲

Optimal v Pedro Martinez: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Pedro Martinez serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPedro winsv AlexMatchupOptimal
Wide41%65%70%61.6%±4.839% ▼
Body11%59%58%53.3%±7.90% ▼
T48%68%74%67.1%±4.461% ▲

Optimal v Alex De Minaur: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPedro winsv AlexMatchupOptimal
Wide54%63%72%62.2%±4.567% ▲
Body16%59%60%55.6%±7.63% ▼
T30%62%69%59.3%±5.730%

Optimal v Alex De Minaur: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Alex De Minaur returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3+2.5+1.7+8.4±1.8
FH down the line21%+1.7+4.4+1.6+7.7±3.5
FH crosscourt11%+5.5−0.5+6.1+11.2±3.6
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2+0.4+1.7−2.1±2.1
FH slice down the line2%−4.3−1.9+0.8−5.4±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.2±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (2397 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
BH through the middle50%+6.4+2.5+1.6+10.5±1.5
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+0.8+1.7+11.3±2.2
BH down the line10%+4.2−2.2+4.4+6.5±4.1
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2−3.3−1.4−8.9±2.3
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−2.6−2.2−4.3±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.3±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (2394 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
FH through the middle56%−3.5+1.5+1.2−0.7±2.3
FH down the line30%−1.8+0.6−1.7−2.9±4.3
FH crosscourt13%−0.2+0.2−1.6−1.6±4.3
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7+0.1−0.5−13.1±1.7

Lean FH through the middle: +1.0±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (654 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
BH through the middle53%−2.9+1.3+1.0−0.6±1.8
BH crosscourt33%+1.0−0.1+1.2+2.2±2.4
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.8−0.8−0.2±4.7
FH through the middle3%−2.9−0.6+1.2−2.2±2.3
FH inside-out2%+1.0−0.5−1.7−1.2±3.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.9±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (1588 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Pedro Martinez returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3+2.1+1.6+8.0±2.0
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+1.1−1.2+5.4±3.5
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2+1.7−0.5−3.0±2.1
FH down the line12%+1.7+1.9−0.2+3.3±3.7
FH slice crosscourt8%−4.3+0.6±0.0−3.7±2.8

Lean FH through the middle: +3.8±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (426 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+2.2+1.1+9.7±1.8
BH crosscourt27%+8.8−3.4+0.4+5.8±2.6
BH down the line13%+4.2−0.4+0.3+4.1±3.9
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2−1.5+1.2−4.5±2.1
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−1.5−2.0−3.0±2.7

Lean BH through the middle: +4.7±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (517 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5+1.2+0.2−2.1±2.3
FH crosscourt37%−0.2−0.4−2.1−2.8±3.8
FH down the line10%−1.8+0.6+0.6−0.6±3.5

Lean FH through the middle: +0.1±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (107 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
BH through the middle41%−2.9−0.2+0.8−2.2±1.8
BH crosscourt30%+1.0±0.0+0.4+1.4±2.4
BH down the line14%−0.2+5.2−0.1+5.0±4.2
FH inside-out7%+1.0−0.7+0.6+0.8±3.1
FH through the middle5%−2.9−0.7+0.2−3.4±1.7

Lean BH down the line: +4.9±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (340 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Alex De Minaur

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+8.4±4.0+0.9+7.5
FH volley to their forehand · rally+7.7±5.2+4.3+3.4
BH to the middle · return+5.1±1.2+1.9+3.3
BH to their forehand · serve +1+5.1±4.0+0.2+4.8
FH to their forehand · return+4.2±3.4+0.8+3.4
FH to the middle · return+4.1±1.4+2.1+2.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · rally−2.5±2.5+0.8−3.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally−1.6±1.7−0.6−0.9
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−0.7±2.4+1.0−1.6
BH slice to the middle · rally−0.6±1.8+0.6−1.2
FH to their backhand · return +1+0.2±2.7−0.6+0.8

Pedro Martinez

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1+5.3±3.7+3.3+2.0
FH to the middle · rally+4.6±1.2+3.5+1.1
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.6±2.3+2.2+1.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.6±2.4+1.3+2.3
FH to the middle · return +1+3.4±2.1+3.1+0.3
BH to the middle · serve +1+3.3±1.9+2.3+1.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH drop shot to their backhand · rally−7.5±5.2−5.1−2.4
BH volley to their forehand · rally−5.1±5.3−0.4−4.7
FH to their forehand · return−1.5±3.2±0.0−1.5
BH slice to their forehand · rally−1.1±2.7−0.6−0.5
FH to their backhand · rally−1.0±1.5+0.6−1.6

Against Pedro Martinez-like opponents

Alex De Minaur vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–62.8%38.7%
Players most similar to Pedro Martinez11 61.1%39.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Lorenzo Musetti, Novak Djokovic, Marton Fucsovics, Roberto Bautista Agut, Nuno Borges, Robin Haase, Pablo Andujar, Filip Krajinovic, Philipp Kohlschreiber, Gaston Gaudio. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.