RallyIQ

Game plan

Casper Ruud v Novak Djokovic

Every number combines what Casper Ruud does well with what Novak Djokovic allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Casper Ruud wins, best of 3 16%90%: 5%–35% · best of 5: 11%
Serve points won 61.5% / 69.6% Casper / Novak · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 28%serve 62.3% / 67.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Casper Ruud's record against Novak Djokovic's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −0.5 on serve, −4.7 on return vs expectation (1442 points); head-to-head: −2.9 on serve, −4.4 on return vs expectation (876 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerCasperNovak
Direction choice−0.03 ±0.05
better than 49%
+0.04 ±0.02
better than 70%
Shot selection−0.02 ±0.09
better than 51%
+0.04 ±0.03
better than 58%
Execution+0.87 ±0.19
better than 93%
+1.17 ±0.10
better than 97%
Points left on the table2.68 ±0.08
lower than 40%
2.24 ±0.03
lower than 89%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Casper Ruud +1.48, Novak Djokovic +0.99. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Casper Ruud serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCasper winsv NovakMatchupOptimal
Wide48%75%69%71.3%±1.944% ▼
Body9%64%58%58.1%±4.00% ▼
T43%78%71%74.1%±2.056% ▲

Optimal v Novak Djokovic: +0.8±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCasper winsv NovakMatchupOptimal
Wide52%71%69%67.4%±2.046% ▼
Body7%60%57%53.9%±5.00% ▼
T41%72%69%68.3%±2.154% ▲

Optimal v Novak Djokovic: +0.8±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Novak Djokovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNovak winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide46%74%73%74.2%±1.859% ▲
Body9%67%63%66.4%±4.00% ▼
T45%76%74%74.7%±1.841% ▼

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.5±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNovak winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide51%74%71%71.7%±1.847% ▼
Body9%63%62%62.3%±4.50% ▼
T40%73%73%73.3%±2.153% ▲

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.8±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Casper Ruud returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
FH through the middle37%+4.3+0.7−0.4+4.6±1.1
FH slice through the middle27%−4.2−0.7+1.0−3.9±1.1
FH down the line13%+1.7+1.2−0.2+2.6±2.4
FH crosscourt11%+5.5−1.3+0.6+4.8±2.5
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+1.5−0.1−2.9±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.5±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (2447 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+1.2+0.5+8.1±0.9
BH crosscourt31%+8.8+2.4+0.7+11.9±1.3
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.7+0.5−5.4±1.3
BH down the line8%+4.2+3.2+0.3+7.7±2.8
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.7+1.0+0.8±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.8±1.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (3085 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5+1.8+0.3−1.4±1.5
FH crosscourt30%−0.2+1.1−1.6−0.7±2.7
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.8−2.6−3.5±3.3
FH slice through the middle5%−12.7+0.2−0.8−13.3±2.3
BH through the middle1%+0.1+0.3+0.6+0.9±0.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.5±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (709 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+0.4+0.9+2.3±1.4
BH through the middle25%−2.9−1.2+0.6−3.5±1.1
FH through the middle17%−2.9−0.2+0.3−2.8±1.2
FH inside-in10%+0.6+2.1−1.6+1.0±2.6
FH inside-out9%+1.0−1.6−2.6−3.2±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.3±1.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (2232 returns charted)

Novak Djokovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3+0.5+0.8+5.5±0.9
FH down the line20%+1.7+1.9−3.0+0.7±1.9
FH crosscourt18%+5.5+0.3+2.7+8.5±2.0
FH slice through the middle8%−4.2+1.5−1.0−3.7±1.5
FH slice down the line2%−4.3+1.4+0.3−2.7±2.7
BH inside-in0%+7.7+2.5−0.3+9.9±2.7

Lean BH inside-in: +5.9±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (11120 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+0.5+0.7+7.6±0.9
BH crosscourt24%+8.8+1.4−0.3+9.9±1.3
BH slice through the middle15%−4.2−0.2−1.0−5.4±1.3
BH down the line11%+4.2+2.2−0.4+6.0±2.5
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−1.0−1.1−1.6±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.2±1.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (9500 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle54%−3.5+1.3+0.4−1.7±1.4
FH down the line28%−1.8+1.5−1.8−2.1±3.0
FH crosscourt16%−0.2+1.5−4.0−2.7±3.0
BH through the middle1%+0.1−1.2±0.0−1.1±1.6
BH inside-out1%+0.9−0.4+3.4+3.9±3.5

Lean BH inside-out: +5.8±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (2581 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH crosscourt43%+1.0+1.4−1.0+1.5±1.1
BH through the middle43%−2.9+0.7±0.0−2.2±0.9
BH down the line10%−0.2+2.0+3.4+5.1±3.0
FH through the middle2%−2.9−0.9+0.4−3.4±1.9
FH inside-out1%+1.0+0.1−1.8−0.8±3.3

Lean BH down the line: +5.2±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (6220 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Casper Ruud

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally+6.5±4.2+5.5+1.0
Smash to the middle · rally+5.8±4.4−0.4+6.3
FH slice to their forehand · return+4.8±2.5+1.8+3.0
FH volley to their backhand · rally+4.6±3.9+3.8+0.8
BH to their backhand · return+3.8±0.9+2.4+1.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.3±1.1+2.6+0.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH drop shot to their forehand · serve +1−3.8±5.3−3.3−0.4
FH drop shot to their backhand · serve +1−2.9±4.8−1.0−1.9
BH volley to their backhand · rally−2.9±4.0−2.0−0.9
BH lob to their backhand · return +1−2.9±4.2−0.4−2.5
BH slice to their forehand · return−2.5±2.9−1.4−1.1

Novak Djokovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1+7.7±5.0+6.2+1.5
FH volley to the middle · rally+5.4±4.8+1.7+3.8
BH volley to the middle · rally+5.0±4.6+5.2−0.3
BH drop shot to their forehand · serve +1+4.6±4.5+0.6+4.0
FH to their forehand · return+3.5±1.8+2.6+0.8
BH to their forehand · return+3.4±1.8+1.8+1.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · serve +1−5.9±2.4−2.9−3.0
BH slice to their forehand · return +1−4.4±3.0−1.4−3.0
Smash to the middle · rally−4.2±4.1−1.0−3.2
FH drop shot to their backhand · rally−4.1±4.3−1.1−3.0
BH slice to their forehand · rally−3.6±2.4+0.3−3.9

Against Novak Djokovic-like opponents

Casper Ruud vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.3%36.7%
Players most similar to Novak Djokovic11 65.2%30.5%
Novak Djokovic (charted head-to-head)6 58.5%28.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Alexander Zverev, Daniil Medvedev, Karen Khachanov, Laslo Djere, Andy Murray, Pablo Andujar, Mikhail Kukushkin, Denis Istomin, Nikolay Davydenko. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head