Game plan
David Nalbandian v Jimmy Connors
Every number combines what David Nalbandian does well with what Jimmy Connors allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective
Forecast
Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by David Nalbandian's record against Jimmy Connors's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +7.1 on serve, +5.8 on return vs expectation (780 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.
Head to head, per 100 shots
| Career | David | Jimmy |
|---|---|---|
| Direction choice | +0.26 ±0.05 better than 97% | ±0.00 ±0.09 better than 56% |
| Shot selection | −0.29 ±0.09 better than 24% | −0.39 ±0.17 better than 17% |
| Execution | +0.33 ±0.30 better than 79% | +0.08 ±0.41 better than 72% |
| Points left on the table | 2.02 ±0.09 lower than 99% | 2.88 ±0.22 lower than 26% |
Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.
Serve plan
The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.
David Nalbandian serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | David wins | v Jimmy | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 40% | 69% | 70% | 65.7%±4.6 | 53% ▲ |
| Body | 13% | 63% | 59% | 58.9%±8.9 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 48% | 71% | 71% | 66.6%±5.1 | 47% |
Optimal v Jimmy Connors: +0.3±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | David wins | v Jimmy | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 54% | 64% | 73% | 64.0%±4.9 | 46% ▼ |
| Body | 5% | 63% | 56% | 56.5%±11.0 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 41% | 70% | 70% | 68.5%±4.8 | 54% ▲ |
Optimal v Jimmy Connors: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Jimmy Connors serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Jimmy wins | v David | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 26% | 62% | 73% | 61.9%±5.3 | 26% |
| Body | 15% | 57% | 76% | 71.0%±8.1 | 28% ▲ |
| T | 60% | 59% | 75% | 59.5%±4.6 | 46% ▼ |
Optimal v David Nalbandian: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +9.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Jimmy wins | v David | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 55% | 64% | 71% | 62.5%±4.4 | 42% ▼ |
| Body | 15% | 59% | 60% | 56.2%±9.6 | 15% |
| T | 30% | 67% | 74% | 69.7%±5.4 | 43% ▲ |
Optimal v David Nalbandian: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Return plan
Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.
David Nalbandian returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Jimmy | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 38% | +4.3 | −0.4 | +0.6 | +4.5±2.0 |
| FH crosscourt | 30% | +5.5 | −3.1 | +5.3 | +7.8±3.2 |
| FH slice through the middle | 11% | −4.2 | −0.6 | +4.2 | −0.6±2.3 |
| FH down the line | 10% | +1.7 | −3.4 | −0.4 | −2.1±4.1 |
| FH slice down the line | 6% | −4.3 | +0.2 | +1.8 | −2.3±2.9 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +4.2±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (933 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Jimmy | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 32% | +8.8 | +1.0 | +4.5 | +14.2±2.7 |
| BH through the middle | 26% | +6.4 | +0.9 | +1.3 | +8.6±2.0 |
| BH slice through the middle | 18% | −4.2 | −0.6 | +4.8 | ±0.0±1.9 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 14% | +0.5 | +0.8 | +9.0 | +10.3±2.6 |
| BH down the line | 6% | +4.2 | +1.8 | −0.8 | +5.1±4.4 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +6.0±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (915 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Jimmy | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 40% | −0.2 | +0.5 | +5.2 | +5.5±4.1 |
| FH through the middle | 35% | −3.5 | −1.9 | +1.0 | −4.4±2.6 |
| FH down the line | 16% | −1.8 | −0.4 | −0.8 | −3.0±4.5 |
| FH slice through the middle | 3% | −12.7 | −0.1 | +2.4 | −10.3±2.0 |
| FH slice down the line | 2% | −9.4 | +0.9 | +1.1 | −7.4±2.3 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +5.7±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (324 returns charted)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Jimmy | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 60% | +1.0 | +0.7 | +2.5 | +4.3±2.5 |
| BH through the middle | 22% | −2.9 | +0.1 | +2.4 | −0.4±2.1 |
| BH down the line | 12% | −0.2 | +1.7 | +2.2 | +3.7±4.9 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 3% | −4.0 | −2.3 | +2.7 | −3.6±2.5 |
| FH through the middle | 2% | −2.9 | −0.4 | +1.0 | −2.3±2.0 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +1.6±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (792 returns charted)
Jimmy Connors returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v David | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 49% | +4.3 | −2.8 | +0.8 | +2.3±2.0 |
| FH crosscourt | 33% | +5.5 | +2.3 | +2.9 | +10.7±3.4 |
| FH down the line | 16% | +1.7 | −2.6 | −0.5 | −1.4±4.0 |
| BH through the middle | 1% | +6.6 | +1.2 | +1.6 | +9.3±1.8 |
| FH slice through the middle | 1% | −4.2 | −2.3 | +1.3 | −5.3±2.0 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +6.2±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (612 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v David | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 43% | +6.4 | −1.7 | +1.6 | +6.3±1.8 |
| BH down the line | 22% | +4.2 | +5.3 | +2.6 | +12.2±3.4 |
| BH crosscourt | 15% | +8.8 | −1.5 | +5.8 | +13.1±3.2 |
| BH slice through the middle | 9% | −4.2 | −4.1 | +1.7 | −6.6±2.2 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 6% | +0.5 | +3.9 | −0.9 | +3.6±3.1 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +6.2±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (866 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v David | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 47% | −0.2 | +2.0 | −1.4 | +0.4±3.8 |
| FH through the middle | 37% | −3.5 | +0.7 | +1.1 | −1.7±2.5 |
| FH down the line | 12% | −1.8 | +1.4 | +3.3 | +2.9±4.6 |
| BH through the middle | 2% | +0.1 | +0.9 | +0.7 | +1.6±1.4 |
| BH inside-in | 1% | +2.5 | −0.5 | +0.3 | +2.3±2.6 |
Lean FH down the line: +3.1±4.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (417 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v David | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 41% | +1.0 | +3.9 | +0.3 | +5.2±2.7 |
| BH through the middle | 32% | −2.9 | +2.6 | +0.7 | +0.4±1.9 |
| BH down the line | 14% | −0.2 | +7.0 | −1.7 | +5.0±4.2 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 6% | −4.0 | +0.4 | ±0.0 | −3.6±2.3 |
| BH slice through the middle | 3% | −11.3 | +1.9 | +1.5 | −7.9±2.2 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +2.6±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (512 returns charted)
Rally plan
Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.
David Nalbandian
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice to their forehand · rally | +6.0±3.3 | −1.6 | +7.6 |
| FH slice to the middle · return | +5.9±3.1 | −1.1 | +7.0 |
| BH slice to the middle · return | +5.6±2.3 | −1.0 | +6.6 |
| BH slice to the middle · rally | +4.7±2.0 | −0.1 | +4.8 |
| BH slice to their backhand · return | +4.6±3.4 | +0.3 | +4.3 |
| BH to their forehand · return | +4.2±4.4 | +0.3 | +3.9 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH to their backhand · serve +1 | −6.2±3.9 | +0.2 | −6.3 |
| BH volley to their forehand · rally | −5.0±8.6 | −6.2 | +1.2 |
| FH to their forehand · serve +1 | −4.2±3.5 | −0.1 | −4.1 |
| FH to their forehand · return +1 | −2.1±4.1 | +0.5 | −2.6 |
| BH to the middle · return +1 | −2.0±2.9 | +2.1 | −4.1 |
Jimmy Connors
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice to their forehand · return | +8.4±5.0 | +9.0 | −0.6 |
| BH to their forehand · return | +8.3±3.8 | +5.2 | +3.1 |
| FH to their backhand · return | +7.0±3.3 | +4.2 | +2.8 |
| BH volley to their forehand · rally | +6.8±8.2 | +5.7 | +1.1 |
| BH to their backhand · return | +6.4±2.9 | +5.0 | +1.5 |
| BH to the middle · return | +1.9±1.8 | +0.7 | +1.2 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH volley to their forehand · rally | −8.6±7.2 | −9.1 | +0.5 |
| FH to their backhand · serve +1 | −5.2±2.8 | −3.0 | −2.2 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | −4.5±1.9 | −3.2 | −1.3 |
| FH to their backhand · rally | −3.1±1.7 | −0.8 | −2.3 |
| FH to their forehand · return | −3.0±4.5 | −6.0 | +2.9 |
Against Jimmy Connors-like opponents
| David Nalbandian v | Matches | Serve pts won | Return pts won |
|---|---|---|---|
| All charted opponents | – | 61.7% | 37.5% |
| Players most similar to Jimmy Connors | 5 | 65.0% | 43.3% |
Similar by tactical fingerprint: Cameron Norrie, Yoshihito Nishioka, Albert Ramos, Rafael Nadal, Jiri Vesely, Fernando Verdasco, Nikolay Davydenko, Thomas Muster, Juan Carlos Ferrero. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.