Game plan
Dominic Thiem v Alexander Zverev
Every number combines what Dominic Thiem does well with what Alexander Zverev allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective
Forecast
Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Dominic Thiem's record against Alexander Zverev's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −0.1 on serve, +3.4 on return vs expectation (3289 points); head-to-head: +1.0 on serve, +4.4 on return vs expectation (1374 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.
Head to head, per 100 shots
| Career | Dominic | Alexander |
|---|---|---|
| Direction choice | +0.12 ±0.03 better than 83% | +0.04 ±0.04 better than 68% |
| Shot selection | −0.28 ±0.08 better than 25% | +0.09 ±0.06 better than 64% |
| Execution | +0.04 ±0.20 better than 71% | +0.83 ±0.20 better than 92% |
| Points left on the table | 2.48 ±0.05 lower than 63% | 2.45 ±0.06 lower than 67% |
Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.
Structural compatibility
Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Dominic Thiem +0.47, Alexander Zverev −0.41. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.
Serve plan
The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.
Dominic Thiem serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Dominic wins | v Alexander | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 47% | 73% | 74% | 74.1%±2.0 | 60% ▲ |
| Body | 5% | 61% | 60% | 58.0%±5.7 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 48% | 74% | 74% | 73.2%±2.2 | 40% ▼ |
Optimal v Alexander Zverev: +0.6±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Dominic wins | v Alexander | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 52% | 71% | 74% | 72.8%±2.2 | 65% ▲ |
| Body | 7% | 64% | 65% | 65.6%±5.3 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 40% | 71% | 71% | 70.0%±2.5 | 35% ▼ |
Optimal v Alexander Zverev: +0.2±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Alexander Zverev serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Alexander wins | v Dominic | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 46% | 74% | 73% | 74.2%±2.0 | 59% ▲ |
| Body | 6% | 62% | 63% | 61.3%±5.1 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 48% | 77% | 73% | 74.7%±2.1 | 41% ▼ |
Optimal v Dominic Thiem: +0.5±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Alexander wins | v Dominic | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 44% | 75% | 72% | 74.4%±2.1 | 39% ▼ |
| Body | 8% | 64% | 65% | 66.6%±5.0 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 48% | 73% | 72% | 73.1%±2.3 | 61% ▲ |
Optimal v Dominic Thiem: +0.3±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Return plan
Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.
Dominic Thiem returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Alexander | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 51% | +4.3 | −1.4 | −0.5 | +2.4±1.0 |
| FH down the line | 22% | +1.7 | −1.0 | −1.8 | −1.1±2.3 |
| FH crosscourt | 17% | +5.5 | −1.0 | +1.2 | +5.7±2.5 |
| FH slice through the middle | 6% | −4.2 | −1.0 | −1.5 | −6.7±1.7 |
| FH slice down the line | 2% | −4.3 | −3.2 | −0.5 | −8.0±3.0 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +4.5±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (2907 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Alexander | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 34% | +6.4 | −1.0 | +0.3 | +5.7±1.0 |
| BH slice through the middle | 18% | −4.2 | −2.3 | −2.4 | −8.9±1.3 |
| BH crosscourt | 18% | +8.8 | −1.5 | −0.6 | +6.7±1.7 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 13% | +0.5 | −2.3 | −4.7 | −6.5±2.0 |
| BH down the line | 12% | +4.2 | −4.1 | −2.4 | −2.3±2.8 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +7.1±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (3946 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Alexander | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 48% | −3.5 | −0.5 | −0.2 | −4.2±1.6 |
| FH crosscourt | 29% | −0.2 | +0.8 | −2.2 | −1.6±3.3 |
| FH down the line | 19% | −1.8 | −0.8 | −4.1 | −6.7±3.6 |
| FH slice through the middle | 2% | −12.7 | −0.5 | +1.5 | −11.6±2.2 |
| FH slice down the line | 1% | −9.4 | −0.3 | −1.3 | −11.0±2.8 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +2.6±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (802 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Alexander | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 32% | −2.9 | −1.0 | +0.6 | −3.2±1.1 |
| BH crosscourt | 27% | +1.0 | +1.2 | −1.3 | +0.9±1.6 |
| FH through the middle | 13% | −2.9 | +0.9 | −0.2 | −2.2±1.4 |
| FH inside-out | 9% | +1.0 | +0.2 | −4.1 | −3.0±2.6 |
| BH down the line | 8% | −0.2 | −5.1 | −0.7 | −5.9±3.8 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +3.7±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (2564 returns charted)
Alexander Zverev returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Dominic | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 55% | +4.3 | −1.3 | −1.2 | +1.7±1.0 |
| FH crosscourt | 28% | +5.5 | −0.9 | −1.6 | +3.1±2.0 |
| FH down the line | 12% | +1.7 | −2.8 | −1.3 | −2.4±2.4 |
| FH slice through the middle | 3% | −4.2 | +0.2 | −1.6 | −5.6±2.0 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 1% | −4.3 | −0.2 | −0.1 | −4.7±2.9 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +1.8±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (4008 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Dominic | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 45% | +6.4 | +1.7 | −1.1 | +7.0±1.0 |
| BH crosscourt | 27% | +8.8 | +1.9 | +0.8 | +11.5±1.5 |
| BH slice through the middle | 10% | −4.2 | −4.8 | −1.9 | −11.0±1.6 |
| BH down the line | 10% | +4.2 | +1.7 | −4.4 | +1.5±2.9 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 5% | +0.5 | −5.6 | −1.4 | −6.5±2.3 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +6.9±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (3276 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Dominic | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 51% | −3.5 | +0.2 | −0.9 | −4.1±1.4 |
| FH crosscourt | 34% | −0.2 | +0.9 | −3.1 | −2.4±2.8 |
| FH down the line | 11% | −1.8 | −0.9 | −0.8 | −3.5±3.6 |
| BH through the middle | 2% | +0.1 | +0.4 | ±0.0 | +0.5±1.5 |
| BH inside-in | 1% | +2.5 | −0.5 | ±0.0 | +2.0±2.5 |
Lean BH inside-in: +5.3±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1307 returns charted)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Dominic | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 49% | +1.0 | +1.3 | ±0.0 | +2.4±1.3 |
| BH through the middle | 40% | −2.9 | +1.0 | ±0.0 | −1.9±1.1 |
| BH down the line | 8% | −0.2 | +1.4 | −0.4 | +0.8±3.6 |
| FH through the middle | 1% | −2.9 | +1.0 | −0.9 | −2.8±1.9 |
| FH inside-in | 1% | +0.6 | −3.7 | −3.1 | −6.2±3.4 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±0.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (2035 returns charted)
Rally plan
Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.
Dominic Thiem
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH drop shot to their forehand · rally | +11.1±5.2 | +7.3 | +3.8 |
| BH volley to their forehand · rally | +8.5±6.3 | +3.2 | +5.3 |
| FH drop shot to their backhand · rally | +6.9±5.7 | +4.5 | +2.4 |
| FH to the middle · return +1 | +6.1±3.2 | +1.9 | +4.2 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | +5.3±3.9 | +4.4 | +0.9 |
| FH volley to their forehand · serve +1 | +5.3±7.4 | −0.1 | +5.4 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice to their forehand · return | −10.0±4.3 | −5.6 | −4.5 |
| FH volley to the middle · rally | −7.4±6.9 | −4.0 | −3.4 |
| FH to the middle · serve +1 | −5.9±3.1 | −3.6 | −2.3 |
| FH slice to the middle · rally | −4.9±2.8 | −1.1 | −3.8 |
| BH to their forehand · serve +1 | −4.7±5.4 | −3.1 | −1.5 |
Alexander Zverev
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH to their forehand · serve +1 | +8.5±4.5 | +4.9 | +3.6 |
| Smash to their backhand · rally | +7.1±4.0 | +3.8 | +3.3 |
| BH drop shot to their backhand · rally | +6.5±4.7 | +5.6 | +0.9 |
| BH to the middle · rally | +3.6±2.5 | +2.5 | +1.0 |
| BH to the middle · serve +1 | +3.2±2.9 | +1.3 | +1.9 |
| BH to the middle · return +1 | +3.2±3.0 | +2.7 | +0.5 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH volley to the middle · rally | −12.0±6.5 | −6.7 | −5.4 |
| BH slice to their backhand · serve +1 | −7.6±3.3 | −6.9 | −0.7 |
| BH slice to their forehand · return | −6.7±4.1 | −6.1 | −0.6 |
| BH slice to their backhand · return | −5.7±3.5 | −3.5 | −2.3 |
| FH to their backhand · return +1 | −5.5±5.1 | −3.8 | −1.7 |
Against Alexander Zverev-like opponents
| Dominic Thiem v | Matches | Serve pts won | Return pts won |
|---|---|---|---|
| All charted opponents | – | 64.6% | 36.3% |
| Players most similar to Alexander Zverev | 18 | 62.3% | 37.4% |
| Alexander Zverev (charted head-to-head) | 7 | 65.5% | 38.1% |
Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Daniil Medvedev, Novak Djokovic, Karen Khachanov, Alexandre Muller, Borna Coric, Taro Daniel, Emil Ruusuvuori, Denis Istomin, Nikolay Davydenko. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.
Charted head-to-head
- Alexander Zverev v Dominic Thiem Madrid Masters SF · Clay · 8 May 2021
- Dominic Thiem v Alexander Zverev US Open F · Hard · 13 Sep 2020
- Dominic Thiem v Alexander Zverev Australian Open SF · Hard · 31 Jan 2020
- Dominic Thiem v Alexander Zverev Tour Finals SF · Hard · 16 Nov 2019
- Alexander Zverev v Dominic Thiem Roland Garros QF · Clay · 5 Jun 2018
- Dominic Thiem v Alexander Zverev Madrid Masters F · Clay · 13 May 2018
- Alexander Zverev v Dominic Thiem Roland Garros R32 · Clay · 28 May 2016