RallyIQ

Game plan

Dusan Lajovic v Thiago Seyboth Wild

Every number combines what Dusan Lajovic does well with what Thiago Seyboth Wild allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Dusan Lajovic wins, best of 3 41%90%: 19%–67% · best of 5: 39%
Serve points won 62.9% / 64.6% Dusan / Thiago · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 41%serve 62.4% / 64.3%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Dusan Lajovic's record against Thiago Seyboth Wild's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +2.2 on serve, −1.4 on return vs expectation (748 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerDusanThiago
Direction choice±0.00 ±0.10
better than 57%
−0.07 ±0.10
better than 38%
Shot selection−0.28 ±0.16
better than 25%
+0.05 ±0.27
better than 59%
Execution+0.03 ±0.42
better than 70%
−0.65 ±0.44
better than 39%
Points left on the table2.65 ±0.16
lower than 46%
2.74 ±0.17
lower than 36%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Dusan Lajovic +0.04, Thiago Seyboth Wild +0.90. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Dusan Lajovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDusan winsv ThiagoMatchupOptimal
Wide48%65%75%67.5%±6.361% ▲
Body10%61%55%52.7%±11.10% ▼
T43%67%74%65.8%±6.439% ▼

Optimal v Thiago Seyboth Wild: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDusan winsv ThiagoMatchupOptimal
Wide57%66%75%68.7%±5.770% ▲
Body11%64%55%55.9%±11.711%
T32%63%70%60.5%±7.519% ▼

Optimal v Thiago Seyboth Wild: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Thiago Seyboth Wild serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowThiago winsv DusanMatchupOptimal
Wide49%68%77%72.2%±5.562% ▲
Body6%62%71%69.9%±11.10% ▼
T45%71%75%70.6%±5.938% ▼

Optimal v Dusan Lajovic: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowThiago winsv DusanMatchupOptimal
Wide59%69%75%71.4%±5.472% ▲
Body5%68%67%71.7%±12.20% ▼
T36%70%69%67.7%±7.028% ▼

Optimal v Dusan Lajovic: +0.2±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Dusan Lajovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3+1.6+2.0+7.9±2.5
FH crosscourt27%+5.5+0.1+3.4+9.0±4.2
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.3−1.1−5.6±2.3
FH down the line10%+1.7+1.2−0.4+2.4±4.4
FH slice crosscourt4%−4.3±0.0+0.4−3.9±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.7±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (533 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
BH through the middle28%+6.4+2.6+0.7+9.7±2.3
BH slice through the middle24%−4.2+0.6−0.5−4.1±2.2
BH crosscourt23%+8.8−0.1+2.5+11.3±3.1
BH slice crosscourt16%+0.5−1.1−1.6−2.2±2.7
BH down the line7%+4.2−2.1+1.9+4.1±4.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.4±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (727 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5+2.4+0.5−0.5±2.8
FH crosscourt36%−0.2+0.8+2.7+3.2±4.3
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.6−1.1−2.3±4.6
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7−1.0±0.0−13.7±1.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.0±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (187 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
BH through the middle26%−2.9+0.9−0.5−2.5±2.3
BH crosscourt23%+1.0−0.7+0.6+0.9±3.1
FH through the middle18%−2.9+0.7+0.5−1.6±2.4
FH inside-in13%+0.6−0.9+2.7+2.3±4.3
FH inside-out9%+1.0±0.0−1.1−0.1±3.7

Lean FH inside-in: +3.7±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (462 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Thiago Seyboth Wild returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3+1.2+2.5+8.0±2.4
FH down the line18%+1.7−0.7+2.7+3.7±4.3
FH slice through the middle14%−4.2−1.7+0.5−5.4±2.3
FH crosscourt12%+5.5−1.4+1.9+6.0±4.2
FH slice down the line6%−4.3−0.5±0.0−4.7±2.0

Lean FH through the middle: +4.4±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (311 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4+0.4+1.9+8.8±2.2
BH crosscourt26%+8.8−0.3+2.6+11.1±3.0
BH down the line13%+4.2−0.9−0.9+2.4±4.5
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.8−0.5−6.4±2.4
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−0.2+0.2+0.5±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.3±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (374 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5±0.0+1.2−2.3±2.9
FH down the line30%−1.8−2.9+3.0−1.7±4.6
FH crosscourt18%−0.2+2.6+0.8+3.2±4.0

Lean FH down the line: −0.6±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (73 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
BH through the middle39%−2.9−1.2−0.3−4.3±2.2
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+0.4−0.9+0.5±2.9
FH through the middle10%−2.9±0.0+1.2−1.7±2.3
BH down the line10%−0.2+2.1+2.7+4.6±4.7
FH inside-out7%+1.0−1.8+3.0+2.2±3.4

Lean BH down the line: +5.6±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (210 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Dusan Lajovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+6.2±4.2+2.3+3.9
FH to their forehand · return+6.0±5.8+1.9+4.1
BH to their backhand · return +1+5.4±4.5+3.7+1.7
BH to the middle · return+5.1±2.9+3.1+2.0
BH to their backhand · return+3.2±4.0+0.8+2.5
FH to the middle · return+2.6±3.0+0.9+1.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−11.3±6.5−4.7−6.7
BH to their forehand · return +1−6.5±7.1−3.9−2.6
FH to their backhand · return +1−3.4±5.5+2.3−5.7
FH to their backhand · return−2.3±5.3+1.3−3.6
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.2±4.5−0.6−1.6

Thiago Seyboth Wild

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return+6.7±3.2+0.8+5.9
BH to their forehand · return+6.4±6.0+2.3+4.1
FH to their forehand · return+5.8±6.1+0.3+5.6
FH to their forehand · serve +1+5.2±4.5+2.0+3.2
BH to the middle · return+4.8±2.7+1.7+3.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1+4.7±3.9+4.2+0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−7.0±7.1−5.6−1.4
FH to their forehand · return +1−6.4±5.5−2.5−3.9
FH to their forehand · rally−3.7±3.5−4.1+0.4
BH to the middle · serve +1−2.1±3.8−0.7−1.4
FH to the middle · rally−1.7±2.8−1.5−0.2

Against Thiago Seyboth Wild-like opponents

Dusan Lajovic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–59.0%32.6%
Players most similar to Thiago Seyboth Wild5 63.7%29.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Flavio Cobolli, Joao Fonseca, Hubert Hurkacz, Alexei Popyrin, Francisco Cerundolo, Aleksandar Vukic, Dominic Thiem, Lloyd Harris, Juan Ignacio Londero. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.