RallyIQ

Game plan

Ivo Karlovic v Patrick Rafter

Every number combines what Ivo Karlovic does well with what Patrick Rafter allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Ivo Karlovic wins, best of 3 45%90%: 21%–70% · best of 5: 44%
Serve points won 70.3% / 71.5% Ivo / Patrick · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 45%serve 70.3% / 71.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Ivo Karlovic's record against Patrick Rafter's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerIvoPatrick
Direction choice−0.09 ±0.11
better than 32%
+0.05 ±0.14
better than 70%
Shot selection+0.49 ±0.20
better than 92%
+0.32 ±0.13
better than 81%
Execution−2.18 ±0.54
better than 1%
−1.03 ±0.40
better than 24%
Points left on the table4.41 ±0.22
lower than 2%
4.17 ±0.28
lower than 3%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Ivo Karlovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowIvo winsv PatrickMatchupOptimal
Wide44%84%73%84.2%±3.139% ▼
Body8%66%69%72.2%±7.50% ▼
T48%82%79%84.7%±2.961% ▲

Optimal v Patrick Rafter: +0.8±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowIvo winsv PatrickMatchupOptimal
Wide62%82%74%83.0%±2.975% ▲
Body7%66%66%69.3%±9.20% ▼
T31%78%70%76.4%±4.525% ▼

Optimal v Patrick Rafter: +0.7±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Patrick Rafter serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPatrick winsv IvoMatchupOptimal
Wide44%82%81%87.3%±2.757% ▲
Body12%67%79%80.8%±5.10% ▼
T44%76%84%84.5%±3.043% ▼

Optimal v Ivo Karlovic: +0.7±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPatrick winsv IvoMatchupOptimal
Wide48%71%78%76.4%±3.848%
Body17%67%72%75.3%±5.84% ▼
T35%73%81%81.9%±3.848% ▲

Optimal v Ivo Karlovic: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Ivo Karlovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PatrickValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3−2.9−3.3−1.9±2.1
FH crosscourt20%+5.5+0.5+1.4+7.4±3.7
FH down the line16%+1.7−1.2+2.0+2.5±3.8
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2+0.2−2.6−6.6±2.3
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3+0.3+0.9−3.1±2.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.3±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (634 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PatrickValue
BH slice through the middle58%−4.2+1.0−2.8−6.0±1.7
BH slice crosscourt23%+0.5−1.3−2.9−3.6±2.5
BH slice down the line15%−8.4±0.0+0.6−7.8±3.3
BH through the middle3%+6.4−3.3−4.3−1.2±2.2
BH crosscourt2%+8.8−5.6−0.5+2.7±2.8

Lean BH through the middle: +4.2±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (924 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PatrickValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−5.1−3.6−12.2±2.6
FH crosscourt34%−0.2−3.4+0.6−3.1±4.3
FH down the line17%−1.8−2.3+3.1−0.9±4.4
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7−0.1−0.7−13.5±1.4

Lean FH down the line: +6.3±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (163 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PatrickValue
BH slice through the middle38%−11.3−1.1+0.4−12.0±2.2
BH slice crosscourt20%−4.0−1.5−3.2−8.8±2.5
FH inside-in14%+0.6−4.2+0.6−3.0±4.3
FH through the middle12%−2.9−0.6−3.6−7.1±2.2
BH slice down the line10%−9.3−1.0−3.5−13.8±4.2
FH inside-out6%+1.0−2.1+3.1+2.1±3.5

Lean FH inside-out: +10.8±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (506 returns charted)

Patrick Rafter returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
FH through the middle38%+4.3−1.3−2.9+0.1±2.1
FH crosscourt25%+5.5−1.4−1.9+2.2±3.9
FH down the line17%+1.7±0.0−0.1+1.7±3.9
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2+3.3−2.3−3.2±2.2
FH slice down the line4%−4.3+0.4+1.2−2.6±3.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.0±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (938 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
BH slice crosscourt36%+0.5+3.0−2.8+0.7±2.5
BH slice through the middle36%−4.2+0.5−3.2−6.9±1.9
BH slice down the line13%−8.4+1.7+1.1−5.6±3.3
BH crosscourt7%+8.8−1.4−0.3+7.1±3.3
BH through the middle7%+6.4−5.7−0.5+0.1±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +9.5±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (1133 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
FH through the middle27%−3.5−0.3−2.0−5.7±2.6
FH slice through the middle20%−12.7+3.6−2.3−11.3±2.4
FH crosscourt18%−0.2−2.1−0.6−2.9±4.4
FH down the line18%−1.8+0.5−2.2−3.5±4.7
FH slice down the line12%−9.4+2.8−0.7−7.4±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.2±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (257 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
BH slice crosscourt34%−4.0+2.3−4.8−6.5±2.2
BH slice through the middle23%−11.3+3.2−3.6−11.7±2.2
BH through the middle13%−2.9−1.8−2.2−6.9±2.2
BH crosscourt11%+1.0+1.9+2.7+5.6±3.0
BH slice down the line9%−9.3+1.1+2.2−6.0±4.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +11.4±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (778 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Ivo Karlovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
Smash to their forehand · rally+5.3±4.5+2.0+3.3
FH volley to their forehand · serve +1+2.4±6.8+3.4−1.0
BH volley to their backhand · rally+1.5±6.6+3.6−2.1
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.5±5.3+2.6−1.1
BH volley to their forehand · rally+1.1±6.9+2.5−1.4
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.1±4.8−0.1+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−9.8±5.2−7.7−2.1
FH to their forehand · rally−7.8±4.7−6.9−0.9
FH to the middle · return−7.3±3.1−2.6−4.6
FH to their backhand · return +1−6.5±4.6−5.6−0.9
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1−6.5±6.8−9.5+3.0

Patrick Rafter

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+10.0±4.8−2.7+12.6
BH to their backhand · return+4.8±3.8+0.7+4.1
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.3±3.7−0.2+3.5
FH to the middle · rally+2.6±3.2+3.0−0.4
FH to their forehand · return +1+1.1±5.2−1.8+2.8
BH to their forehand · return +1−0.6±4.6−2.2+1.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return +1−7.4±3.0−3.3−4.2
FH to the middle · return +1−7.4±3.2−0.9−6.5
FH to their backhand · rally−6.7±4.4−3.4−3.3
BH to the middle · return−6.3±3.1−7.1+0.8
BH to their forehand · return−6.1±5.0−4.8−1.3

Against Patrick Rafter-like opponents

Ivo Karlovic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–70.9%25.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefan Edberg, Tim Henman, Max Mirnyi, Greg Rusedski, Mark Philippoussis, Richard Krajicek, Boris Becker, Michael Stich, John Mcenroe, Pat Cash. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.