RallyIQ

Game plan

Ivo Karlovic v Steve Johnson

Every number combines what Ivo Karlovic does well with what Steve Johnson allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Ivo Karlovic wins, best of 3 47%90%: 22%–73% · best of 5: 46%
Serve points won 69.7% / 70.4% Ivo / Steve · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 50%serve 69.9% / 69.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Ivo Karlovic's record against Steve Johnson's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −2.7 on serve, −12.0 on return vs expectation (202 points); head-to-head: −0.9 on serve, +5.2 on return vs expectation (126 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerIvoSteve
Direction choice−0.09 ±0.11
better than 32%
+0.20 ±0.08
better than 95%
Shot selection+0.49 ±0.20
better than 92%
−1.01 ±0.24
better than 2%
Execution−2.18 ±0.54
better than 1%
−1.39 ±0.57
better than 13%
Points left on the table4.41 ±0.22
lower than 2%
2.71 ±0.16
lower than 39%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Ivo Karlovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowIvo winsv SteveMatchupOptimal
Wide44%84%77%86.8%±3.457% ▲
Body8%66%72%74.7%±8.70% ▼
T48%82%79%85.0%±3.743% ▼

Optimal v Steve Johnson: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowIvo winsv SteveMatchupOptimal
Wide62%82%79%86.6%±3.455% ▼
Body7%66%64%66.8%±10.90% ▼
T31%78%82%86.1%±3.945% ▲

Optimal v Steve Johnson: +0.9±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Steve Johnson serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSteve winsv IvoMatchupOptimal
Wide45%70%81%78.2%±4.742% ▼
Body10%66%79%80.4%±6.90% ▼
T45%77%84%85.2%±3.958% ▲

Optimal v Ivo Karlovic: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSteve winsv IvoMatchupOptimal
Wide56%75%78%79.8%±4.553% ▼
Body11%67%72%75.8%±8.40% ▼
T34%70%81%80.0%±5.147% ▲

Optimal v Ivo Karlovic: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +0.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Ivo Karlovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SteveValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3−2.9+1.5+2.8±2.4
FH crosscourt20%+5.5+0.5+3.9+9.9±4.2
FH down the line16%+1.7−1.2+1.9+2.4±4.3
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2+0.2+1.1−2.9±2.3
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3+0.3±0.0−4.0±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.8±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (634 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SteveValue
BH slice through the middle58%−4.2+1.0+0.5−2.7±2.0
BH slice crosscourt23%+0.5−1.3−0.6−1.3±2.7
BH slice down the line15%−8.4±0.0−1.7−10.1±3.0
BH through the middle3%+6.4−3.3−1.0+2.2±2.6
BH crosscourt2%+8.8−5.6−2.5+0.7±3.2

Lean BH through the middle: +5.5±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (924 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SteveValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−5.1−0.1−8.7±2.9
FH crosscourt34%−0.2−3.4+3.5−0.1±4.3
FH down the line17%−1.8−2.3+1.7−2.3±4.6
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7−0.1+1.2−11.5±1.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.6±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (163 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SteveValue
BH slice through the middle38%−11.3−1.1−0.7−13.1±2.0
BH slice crosscourt20%−4.0−1.5−2.3−7.8±2.5
FH inside-in14%+0.6−4.2+3.5−0.1±4.3
FH through the middle12%−2.9−0.6−0.1−3.6±2.4
BH slice down the line10%−9.3−1.0−0.6−10.8±3.5
FH inside-out6%+1.0−2.1+1.7+0.6±3.7

Lean FH inside-out: +8.6±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (506 returns charted)

Steve Johnson returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
FH through the middle36%+4.3−0.8−2.9+0.6±2.6
FH crosscourt20%+5.5−3.1−1.9+0.5±4.4
FH down the line19%+1.7−1.6−0.1±0.0±4.3
FH slice through the middle15%−4.2+0.7−2.3−5.8±2.3
FH slice down the line6%−4.3+1.7+1.2−1.4±3.0

Lean FH through the middle: +1.5±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (318 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
BH slice through the middle28%−4.2+1.2−3.2−6.1±2.3
BH slice crosscourt25%+0.5+3.0−2.8+0.7±3.0
BH through the middle23%+6.4−2.6−0.5+3.3±2.4
BH crosscourt12%+8.8−1.9−0.3+6.5±3.3
BH down the line7%+4.2+0.1−0.1+4.3±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.6±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (339 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
FH through the middle39%−3.5+1.5−2.0−4.0±2.6
FH crosscourt28%−0.2−1.9−0.6−2.7±4.2
FH down the line24%−1.8+0.5−2.2−3.5±4.4
FH slice through the middle10%−12.7+0.1−2.3−14.8±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.8±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (72 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
BH slice crosscourt26%−4.0+0.1−4.8−8.7±2.5
BH through the middle15%−2.9−1.7−2.2−6.8±2.3
BH slice through the middle14%−11.3−0.3−3.6−15.2±2.4
FH through the middle11%−2.9+0.8−2.0−4.0±2.2
BH crosscourt10%+1.0−3.2+2.7+0.5±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.7±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (247 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Ivo Karlovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally+5.6±8.1−1.8+7.3
BH slice to the middle · return±0.0±2.8−1.1+1.1
FH to their forehand · serve +1−0.2±5.5+2.6−2.8
FH to their forehand · return−0.4±5.7−7.7+7.2
FH to the middle · return−1.4±3.2−2.6+1.3
FH to their backhand · return−1.4±4.9−5.2+3.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−10.8±4.6−6.9−3.9
FH to their backhand · return +1−10.7±5.1−5.6−5.1
FH to the middle · return +1−7.6±3.6−6.4−1.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally−6.8±3.5−2.9−3.8
FH to their forehand · return +1−6.2±5.4−4.8−1.5

Steve Johnson

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+11.6±5.2−1.1+12.6
FH to their forehand · return +1+4.3±5.5+1.5+2.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.4±4.3+4.0−1.6
BH to the middle · return+1.6±3.2+0.7+0.8
BH to their backhand · return+1.5±4.1−2.5+4.1
FH to their backhand · return−1.5±4.6−0.9−0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−5.9±4.0−2.6−3.3
FH to their forehand · rally−5.6±4.3−0.6−5.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1−5.0±4.8−1.1−3.9
FH to the middle · serve +1−4.7±3.4−2.3−2.4
BH slice to their backhand · rally−4.6±2.6−0.1−4.4

Against Steve Johnson-like opponents

Ivo Karlovic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–70.9%25.6%
Players most similar to Steve Johnson2 66.7%16.3%
Steve Johnson (charted head-to-head)1 71.6%33.9%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Matteo Berrettini, Grigor Dimitrov, Alexei Popyrin, Dominic Thiem, Milos Raonic, Jeremy Chardy, Malek Jaziri, Tim Van Rijthoven, Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Fernando Gonzalez. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head