RallyIQ

Game plan

James Blake v Tommy Haas

Every number combines what James Blake does well with what Tommy Haas allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

James Blake wins, best of 3 30%90%: 10%–60% · best of 5: 26%
Serve points won 62.6% / 66.8% James / Tommy · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 39%serve 64.3% / 66.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by James Blake's record against Tommy Haas's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −3.4 on serve, −1.2 on return vs expectation (1824 points); head-to-head: −4.5 on serve, +1.8 on return vs expectation (307 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerJamesTommy
Direction choice+0.08 ±0.07
better than 78%
+0.12 ±0.07
better than 84%
Shot selection+0.03 ±0.12
better than 56%
−0.59 ±0.12
better than 9%
Execution−0.86 ±0.36
better than 30%
−0.02 ±0.38
better than 67%
Points left on the table2.49 ±0.14
lower than 62%
2.57 ±0.14
lower than 52%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

James Blake serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJames winsv TommyMatchupOptimal
Wide39%68%72%67.3%±5.038%
Body13%64%63%63.4%±8.70% ▼
T49%75%77%77.3%±4.362% ▲

Optimal v Tommy Haas: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJames winsv TommyMatchupOptimal
Wide51%71%79%77.8%±4.164% ▲
Body8%58%67%61.5%±10.90% ▼
T41%70%75%73.3%±5.036% ▼

Optimal v Tommy Haas: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Tommy Haas serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowTommy winsv JamesMatchupOptimal
Wide38%72%76%74.8%±4.651% ▲
Body4%62%58%55.9%±10.70% ▼
T57%69%76%71.1%±4.449% ▼

Optimal v James Blake: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowTommy winsv JamesMatchupOptimal
Wide53%73%69%68.8%±4.666% ▲
Body6%57%59%52.7%±11.20% ▼
T41%66%72%65.3%±5.534% ▼

Optimal v James Blake: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

James Blake returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
FH crosscourt38%+5.5+0.1+2.5+8.2±3.7
FH through the middle34%+4.3−2.7+0.2+1.7±2.3
FH down the line22%+1.7−0.6−1.0+0.1±3.8
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2−0.6+0.7−4.1±2.2
FH slice crosscourt1%−4.3+0.1−1.1−5.4±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.7±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (587 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
BH slice through the middle25%−4.2+3.0+2.3+1.1±1.9
BH through the middle25%+6.4−2.0+0.8+5.2±2.2
BH slice crosscourt17%+0.5+4.2+2.5+7.2±2.5
BH crosscourt16%+8.8−1.4+3.3+10.7±3.0
BH down the line11%+4.2−0.1+0.4+4.5±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.1±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (875 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
FH through the middle33%−3.5+0.9+1.4−1.1±2.6
FH crosscourt31%−0.2+1.6−0.8+0.6±4.4
FH down the line26%−1.8−0.5−3.0−5.3±4.5
FH slice through the middle6%−12.7+1.1±0.0−11.6±1.3
FH slice down the line3%−9.4−2.1±0.0−11.5±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.3±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (159 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
BH crosscourt35%+1.0−3.3−1.2−3.5±2.6
BH through the middle31%−2.9−0.2+1.0−2.1±2.0
BH down the line17%−0.2+0.5+1.7+2.0±4.7
BH slice crosscourt6%−4.0+0.4−1.6−5.2±2.5
BH slice through the middle4%−11.3+0.4−0.8−11.7±2.3

Lean BH down the line: +4.3±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (545 returns charted)

Tommy Haas returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JamesValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3+0.8±0.0+5.0±2.2
FH crosscourt22%+5.5−0.4−3.0+2.1±3.9
FH down the line17%+1.7+1.4+0.8+3.9±3.9
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2+3.3+1.0+0.1±2.3
FH slice down the line4%−4.3+1.0+0.1−3.1±3.0

Lean FH through the middle: +2.0±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (729 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JamesValue
BH slice through the middle38%−4.2+3.4+0.3−0.4±1.9
BH slice crosscourt22%+0.5+4.2+2.9+7.7±2.6
BH through the middle15%+6.4+3.0+0.6+10.1±2.4
BH slice down the line9%−8.4+3.5+1.3−3.6±3.5
BH crosscourt8%+8.8+2.1−1.2+9.8±3.4

Lean BH through the middle: +6.3±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (754 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JamesValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.2+0.2−2.0±2.6
FH crosscourt25%−0.2−2.8+6.0+2.9±4.3
FH down the line23%−1.8−1.3+3.0±0.0±4.4
FH slice through the middle5%−12.7+1.3+1.6−9.7±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.6±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (204 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JamesValue
BH through the middle28%−2.9−1.1−0.8−4.7±2.1
BH crosscourt23%+1.0+0.6−0.6+1.0±2.7
BH slice crosscourt20%−4.0+0.5+1.3−2.2±2.3
BH slice through the middle13%−11.3−1.2+1.3−11.2±2.4
BH down the line12%−0.2+1.5−1.6−0.3±4.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.4±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (585 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

James Blake

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · return+7.4±3.8+4.8+2.6
BH volley to their backhand · rally+6.0±6.9−0.1+6.1
BH slice to the middle · return+4.3±3.1+2.2+2.0
FH to their forehand · return+4.2±6.1+4.3−0.1
BH volley to their forehand · rally+3.4±8.3+3.8−0.5
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.2±5.0−1.8+5.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−8.0±5.6−0.9−7.1
FH to their backhand · return−6.5±5.4−2.4−4.1
BH to their forehand · return +1−4.6±6.9−4.0−0.6
FH to the middle · rally−4.5±3.3−3.3−1.2
FH to their forehand · serve +1−3.9±5.0−3.2−0.7

Tommy Haas

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · return+4.6±3.9+3.6+1.0
BH slice to the middle · return+4.1±3.1+4.3−0.2
FH slice to the middle · return+2.6±3.6+3.8−1.3
FH to the middle · rally+2.2±3.2+1.1+1.1
BH to the middle · return+2.0±3.4+1.1+1.0
FH to their backhand · return+1.9±5.5−1.0+2.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−6.4±4.4−2.5−3.9
FH volley to their forehand · rally−6.1±7.1−0.5−5.6
FH to their backhand · rally−4.8±4.5−3.0−1.8
FH to the middle · serve +1−4.1±3.6−2.3−1.7
FH to their backhand · serve +1−3.8±4.8−4.4+0.6

Against Tommy Haas-like opponents

James Blake vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–60.9%35.9%
Players most similar to Tommy Haas11 56.6%32.1%
Tommy Haas (charted head-to-head)1 59.4%39.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Lorenzo Musetti, Stan Wawrinka, Benjamin Bonzi, Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Juan Martin Del Potro, Roger Federer, Marcos Baghdatis, David Nalbandian, Ivan Ljubicic. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head