RallyIQ

Game plan

Jan Lennard Struff v Marin Cilic

Every number combines what Jan Lennard Struff does well with what Marin Cilic allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Jan Lennard Struff wins, best of 3 54%90%: 32%–75% · best of 5: 55%
Serve points won 66.3% / 65.5% Jan / Marin · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 52%serve 66.1% / 65.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Jan Lennard Struff's record against Marin Cilic's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +3.8 on serve, +3.3 on return vs expectation (248 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerJanMarin
Direction choice−0.02 ±0.10
better than 52%
+0.14 ±0.05
better than 87%
Shot selection+0.40 ±0.15
better than 86%
+0.28 ±0.08
better than 78%
Execution−0.74 ±0.60
better than 35%
−1.01 ±0.32
better than 25%
Points left on the table2.93 ±0.18
lower than 24%
2.18 ±0.08
lower than 93%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Jan Lennard Struff −0.84, Marin Cilic −1.88. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Jan Lennard Struff serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJan winsv MarinMatchupOptimal
Wide47%78%74%78.4%±3.460% ▲
Body7%59%67%63.8%±8.50% ▼
T46%78%74%77.0%±3.740% ▼

Optimal v Marin Cilic: +0.5±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJan winsv MarinMatchupOptimal
Wide54%77%76%79.7%±3.467% ▲
Body7%60%59%56.2%±9.40% ▼
T40%75%71%74.9%±4.233% ▼

Optimal v Marin Cilic: +0.9±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Marin Cilic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMarin winsv JanMatchupOptimal
Wide50%73%77%77.2%±3.541% ▼
Body4%58%65%59.7%±9.20% ▼
T46%80%79%84.2%±2.959% ▲

Optimal v Jan Lennard Struff: +0.4±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMarin winsv JanMatchupOptimal
Wide53%76%77%79.3%±3.450% ▼
Body7%63%62%62.0%±8.70% ▼
T40%76%75%78.7%±3.750% ▲

Optimal v Jan Lennard Struff: +0.5±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Jan Lennard Struff returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−0.2−1.4+2.7±1.9
FH crosscourt29%+5.5−0.1−1.4+4.0±3.6
FH down the line12%+1.7−1.7−1.6−1.5±3.9
FH slice through the middle7%−4.2+0.6+0.9−2.7±2.1
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3−0.3+0.5−4.1±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.0±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (558 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
BH through the middle53%+6.4+2.2−0.5+8.1±1.8
BH crosscourt31%+8.8−0.1+1.5+10.2±2.7
BH down the line8%+4.2−2.6+0.1+1.8±4.4
BH slice through the middle4%−4.2−2.1±0.0−6.4±2.1
BH slice down the line2%−8.4−1.8−1.7−11.9±3.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.1±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (612 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5−0.8+0.8−3.4±2.4
FH crosscourt38%−0.2+0.4−1.5−1.4±4.1
FH down the line9%−1.8−2.7+1.0−3.5±3.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.2±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (162 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9−0.2−0.6−3.7±1.6
BH crosscourt41%+1.0+0.6+0.2+1.9±2.2
BH down the line12%−0.2+6.6+1.2+7.5±4.4

Lean BH down the line: +7.5±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (499 returns charted)

Marin Cilic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JanValue
FH through the middle54%+4.3−0.2+0.1+4.2±1.9
FH crosscourt24%+5.5−1.8−0.1+3.7±3.6
FH down the line21%+1.7−1.0+0.4+1.0±3.8
FH slice through the middle1%−4.2+1.3+0.4−2.6±2.2
FH slice crosscourt0%−4.3+0.1−0.4−4.6±2.3

Lean FH through the middle: +0.9±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1630 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JanValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4±0.0−0.4+6.0±1.8
BH crosscourt31%+8.8−4.3−2.1+2.4±2.7
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−4.5+0.8−7.9±2.2
BH down the line8%+4.2+4.7−2.7+6.2±4.4
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−4.3−2.8−6.5±2.9

Lean BH down the line: +3.9±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1619 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JanValue
FH through the middle51%−3.5±0.0+0.9−2.6±2.1
FH down the line26%−1.8+1.0−0.6−1.4±4.3
FH crosscourt23%−0.2−1.1−1.4−2.7±4.0

Lean FH down the line: +0.9±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (484 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JanValue
BH crosscourt48%+1.0−2.7+1.1−0.6±2.4
BH through the middle40%−2.9+0.3+0.9−1.8±1.8
BH down the line6%−0.2+0.5−4.4−4.1±5.0
FH inside-in2%+0.6+1.2−1.4+0.4±3.9
FH inside-out2%+1.0+0.7−0.6+1.1±3.3

Lean FH inside-out: +2.4±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (924 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Jan Lennard Struff

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1+4.8±3.1+3.0+1.7
BH to their forehand · return+1.6±3.5+1.4+0.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1+1.4±4.0+0.9+0.6
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.1±2.6−0.4+1.5
BH to their forehand · return +1+0.7±4.4−0.5+1.2
FH to their backhand · return +1+0.6±3.3+0.8−0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−3.9±3.3−3.4−0.5
BH slice to the middle · rally−2.9±1.9−2.6−0.3
BH to their backhand · rally−2.9±1.4−3.2+0.3
BH to the middle · rally−2.7±1.3−2.6−0.1
BH to their backhand · serve +1−2.6±2.2−2.2−0.4

Marin Cilic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1+2.7±4.0+1.0+1.7
BH to their forehand · return +1+1.8±4.3−0.8+2.6
BH to the middle · return+0.3±1.3+0.3±0.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1+0.3±2.3+0.5−0.3
FH to their backhand · rally+0.1±1.7−1.8+1.9
BH to their backhand · return +1−0.1±2.4−2.3+2.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · rally−6.4±2.8−2.3−4.0
BH to the middle · serve +1−5.8±1.9−4.1−1.8
BH slice to their backhand · return−5.5±2.8−3.3−2.2
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−4.6±2.5−2.4−2.2
BH slice to the middle · rally−4.4±2.0−1.3−3.1

Against Marin Cilic-like opponents

Jan Lennard Struff vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–64.8%32.9%
Players most similar to Marin Cilic2 69.3%37.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Arthur Fils, Felix Auger Aliassime, Aleksandar Vukic, Roman Safiullin, Sebastian Ofner, Thanasi Kokkinakis, Lloyd Harris, J J Wolf, Kyle Edmund, Sam Querrey. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.