RallyIQ

Game plan

Karolina Muchova v Kirsten Flipkens

Every number combines what Karolina Muchova does well with what Kirsten Flipkens allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Karolina Muchova wins, best of 3 79%90%: 51%–95% · best of 5: 85%
Serve points won 61.1% / 54.9% Karolina / Kirsten · tour 56.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 79%serve 60.9% / 54.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Karolina Muchova's record against Kirsten Flipkens's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +4.9 on serve, −0.6 on return vs expectation (420 points); head-to-head: −5.2 on serve, −0.6 on return vs expectation (209 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerKarolinaKirsten
Direction choice−0.01 ±0.05
better than 52%
+0.47 ±0.14
better than 99%
Shot selection−0.17 ±0.09
better than 30%
−1.40 ±0.28
better than 1%
Execution+0.22 ±0.28
better than 70%
−0.56 ±0.51
better than 31%
Points left on the table2.88 ±0.08
lower than 18%
2.87 ±0.26
lower than 19%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Karolina Muchova serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKarolina winsv KirstenMatchupOptimal
Wide40%68%62%65.1%±7.840%
Body22%58%52%52.6%±9.27% ▼
T38%74%71%77.0%±6.453% ▲

Optimal v Kirsten Flipkens: +1.8±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +10.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKarolina winsv KirstenMatchupOptimal
Wide48%68%65%67.5%±7.549% ▲
Body14%57%57%57.1%±10.80% ▼
T39%67%65%68.1%±7.651% ▲

Optimal v Kirsten Flipkens: +0.4±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Kirsten Flipkens serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKirsten winsv KarolinaMatchupOptimal
Wide48%56%65%54.6%±7.043% ▼
Body10%56%58%56.1%±11.40% ▼
T42%67%69%67.4%±7.457% ▲

Optimal v Karolina Muchova: +0.8±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +7.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKirsten winsv KarolinaMatchupOptimal
Wide61%69%66%69.1%±6.768% ▲
Body12%51%54%48.8%±11.70% ▼
T27%61%64%60.2%±8.832% ▲

Optimal v Karolina Muchova: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Karolina Muchova returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KirstenValue
FH through the middle41%+4.2+1.1+1.6+6.8±2.5
FH slice through the middle18%−6.7+3.0+0.8−2.9±2.3
FH crosscourt15%+5.3−0.7+4.6+9.2±4.0
FH down the line14%+1.5−2.9+3.6+2.3±4.4
FH slice crosscourt9%−6.6+2.2+0.4−4.1±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.0±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1182 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KirstenValue
BH through the middle46%+6.0−0.4+0.5+6.1±2.3
BH crosscourt20%+7.7+0.9+2.4+11.0±3.3
BH slice through the middle14%−6.2+0.2−3.0−9.0±2.3
BH down the line12%+2.2−1.2+1.1+2.1±4.1
BH slice crosscourt5%−4.2−0.8+1.0−4.0±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.4±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (1188 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KirstenValue
FH through the middle43%−3.2−1.4+1.4−3.2±3.0
FH crosscourt28%+0.5−0.4+1.1+1.2±4.3
FH down the line21%−0.6−1.9+3.1+0.6±5.1
FH slice through the middle5%−15.2+0.1±0.0−15.1±1.5
FH slice crosscourt3%−14.9+1.3±0.0−13.6±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.3±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (247 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KirstenValue
BH through the middle40%−2.6+1.0+0.8−0.8±2.5
BH crosscourt31%+1.5−0.4+0.8+1.9±3.4
BH down the line20%−0.5−0.3+0.8±0.0±5.0
FH inside-in5%+0.7−1.9+1.1−0.1±4.5
FH through the middle3%−2.7+1.7+1.4+0.4±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.6±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (582 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Kirsten Flipkens returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
FH slice through the middle26%−6.7+1.1−1.7−7.3±2.4
FH through the middle24%+4.2+1.1−0.1+5.2±2.5
FH crosscourt22%+5.3−1.5−1.4+2.5±3.9
FH down the line14%+1.5+0.9−0.7+1.7±3.9
FH slice crosscourt14%−6.6+1.3−2.5−7.9±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +6.1±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (153 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
BH slice through the middle45%−6.2+1.7−1.1−5.7±2.5
BH slice crosscourt37%−4.2+3.1−2.1−3.2±3.1
BH crosscourt7%+7.7+0.3+0.3+8.4±2.5
BH through the middle6%+6.0+1.4+0.1+7.5±1.8
BH slice down the line5%−12.5+0.9−0.9−12.5±3.1

Lean BH slice crosscourt: +0.2±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (153 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
FH down the line43%−0.6+0.4−1.0−1.2±4.5
FH through the middle39%−3.2−0.3+0.5−3.0±2.4
FH crosscourt17%+0.5−2.6−3.9−6.0±3.2

Lean FH down the line: +1.5±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (46 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
BH slice crosscourt48%−7.5−0.9−1.3−9.7±2.7
BH slice through the middle23%−11.7−0.5+0.3−11.9±1.9
FH inside-out17%+1.4+1.4−1.0+1.7±3.3
FH through the middle12%−2.7−0.4+0.5−2.6±1.7

Lean BH slice crosscourt: −2.3±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (52 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Karolina Muchova

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+4.6±3.9−0.3+4.9
FH to their forehand · return+3.6±3.8−1.0+4.7
FH to the middle · return+2.9±2.3+0.9+2.0
BH to their backhand · return+2.2±2.9−0.1+2.3
BH to their backhand · return +1+1.1±3.2+0.8+0.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1+0.6±3.3+2.7−2.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−2.9±2.9−1.4−1.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1−1.5±3.4±0.0−1.5
BH to their backhand · serve +1−0.9±3.2−0.1−0.9
BH to the middle · rally−0.6±2.0−0.6±0.0
BH to their backhand · rally−0.5±2.6+1.5−2.1

Kirsten Flipkens

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · rally+0.4±2.0+1.8−1.4
BH slice to their forehand · rally+0.4±3.5+3.0−2.7
BH slice to their backhand · rally+0.2±2.3+1.4−1.2
FH to their backhand · return−0.1±3.6+0.9−1.0
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−0.6±2.9+1.3−1.9
FH to the middle · return−0.7±2.3−0.4−0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−5.2±3.8−1.9−3.4
FH to their forehand · return +1−4.4±3.3−3.8−0.6
FH to the middle · rally−3.5±2.1−2.8−0.7
FH to their backhand · rally−3.4±3.0−0.5−2.9
BH slice to their backhand · return−2.4±3.0+0.3−2.7

Against Kirsten Flipkens-like opponents

Karolina Muchova vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.6%42.9%
Players most similar to Kirsten Flipkens3 64.6%39.5%
Kirsten Flipkens (charted head-to-head)1 56.1%44.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Taylor Townsend, Petra Martic, Ashleigh Barty, Kiki Bertens, Francesca Schiavone, Roberta Vinci, Amelie Mauresmo, Conchita Martinez, Steffi Graf. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head