RallyIQ

Game plan

Lorenzo Sonego v Lleyton Hewitt

Every number combines what Lorenzo Sonego does well with what Lleyton Hewitt allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Lorenzo Sonego wins, best of 3 14%90%: 5%–30% · best of 5: 8%
Serve points won 60.4% / 69.4% Lorenzo / Lleyton · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 13%serve 60.9% / 70.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Lorenzo Sonego's record against Lleyton Hewitt's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −5.6 on serve, +11.9 on return vs expectation (229 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerLorenzoLleyton
Direction choice−0.13 ±0.09
better than 22%
+0.49 ±0.04
better than 100%
Shot selection+0.12 ±0.22
better than 67%
−0.09 ±0.09
better than 41%
Execution−0.79 ±0.46
better than 33%
+0.77 ±0.16
better than 91%
Points left on the table2.89 ±0.14
lower than 25%
1.79 ±0.06
lower than 100%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Lorenzo Sonego serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowLorenzo winsv LleytonMatchupOptimal
Wide56%67%69%62.9%±3.555%
Body12%63%56%55.6%±7.60% ▼
T32%75%75%75.0%±3.845% ▲

Optimal v Lleyton Hewitt: +1.1±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +9.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowLorenzo winsv LleytonMatchupOptimal
Wide46%75%68%70.2%±3.859% ▲
Body15%67%63%67.1%±7.12% ▼
T39%73%70%71.9%±3.939%

Optimal v Lleyton Hewitt: +0.2±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Lleyton Hewitt serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowLleyton winsv LorenzoMatchupOptimal
Wide50%73%74%73.9%±3.440% ▼
Body3%68%69%73.8%±7.50% ▼
T47%80%77%81.9%±2.960% ▲

Optimal v Lorenzo Sonego: +0.4±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowLleyton winsv LorenzoMatchupOptimal
Wide51%74%75%75.9%±3.442% ▼
Body4%60%70%67.2%±8.50% ▼
T45%70%78%77.1%±3.758% ▲

Optimal v Lorenzo Sonego: +0.7±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Lorenzo Sonego returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LleytonValue
FH through the middle33%+4.3+1.6+1.2+7.1±1.9
FH slice through the middle23%−4.2+0.7+4.7+1.1±1.8
FH down the line19%+1.7+1.7−0.8+2.6±3.3
FH crosscourt12%+5.5±0.0−1.4+4.1±3.4
FH slice down the line9%−4.3−1.4+3.5−2.2±3.1

Lean FH through the middle: +3.8±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (725 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LleytonValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+0.2−1.1+5.5±1.8
BH crosscourt23%+8.8±0.0−0.7+8.1±2.6
BH slice through the middle15%−4.2−0.4+3.4−1.2±1.8
BH down the line10%+4.2−4.5−0.7−1.0±4.1
BH slice down the line5%−8.4−1.1+2.9−6.5±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.4±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (873 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LleytonValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5−1.2+2.0−2.6±2.3
FH down the line24%−1.8+2.8+2.2+3.2±3.8
FH crosscourt20%−0.2−0.2+1.4+1.0±3.4
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7+0.5+2.8−9.4±2.0
FH slice down the line4%−9.4−0.2−0.5−10.2±2.5

Lean FH down the line: +4.3±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (139 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LleytonValue
BH through the middle43%−2.9−1.1+1.2−2.7±1.5
BH crosscourt34%+1.0−1.2+0.2+0.1±2.0
BH down the line9%−0.2−0.5+1.2+0.4±4.1
FH through the middle7%−2.9+1.0+2.0+0.2±1.9
FH inside-out3%+1.0−0.7+2.2+2.5±2.9

Lean FH inside-out: +3.5±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (708 returns charted)

Lleyton Hewitt returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
FH through the middle31%+4.3+1.5±0.0+5.8±1.6
FH crosscourt25%+5.5+1.0+3.6+10.1±3.1
FH down the line18%+1.7+4.1+0.4+6.2±3.1
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2+1.4−1.5−4.3±1.9
FH slice crosscourt9%−4.3+1.3−1.1−4.2±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.5±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (2677 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
BH crosscourt35%+8.8+2.5+0.2+11.5±2.3
BH through the middle30%+6.4+2.1+0.7+9.1±1.7
BH slice through the middle13%−4.2−0.1+0.1−4.2±2.0
BH down the line9%+4.2+4.5+3.9+12.6±4.0
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−2.1−2.3−3.9±2.7

Lean BH down the line: +5.9±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (2761 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
FH through the middle34%−3.5+1.8−0.1−1.7±2.1
FH crosscourt34%−0.2−0.2−0.3−0.7±3.7
FH down the line28%−1.8+0.9−1.5−2.4±3.9
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7±0.0−0.3−12.9±1.8
BH inside-in1%+2.5+0.6+0.2+3.3±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.1±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (872 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LorenzoValue
BH crosscourt51%+1.0+1.4+0.2+2.6±2.0
BH through the middle25%−2.9+1.9+0.8−0.2±1.6
BH down the line10%−0.2−0.8+0.6−0.5±4.4
FH inside-out6%+1.0+1.0−1.5+0.4±3.3
FH inside-in4%+0.6+4.2−0.3+4.4±4.2

Lean FH inside-in: +3.2±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (2503 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Lorenzo Sonego

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · return+6.0±3.1+1.0+4.9
BH slice to the middle · return+5.9±2.7+1.4+4.5
BH slice to their forehand · return +1+4.8±5.1−0.6+5.4
BH to the middle · return +1+3.9±3.3+2.2+1.7
FH volley to their forehand · rally+3.9±7.6+4.6−0.7
BH slice to their forehand · rally+3.2±4.1+2.7+0.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally−8.7±7.6−4.5−4.2
FH volley to their backhand · rally−7.9±7.6−1.7−6.1
FH to their backhand · return +1−7.1±5.0−5.2−1.9
FH to their forehand · return +1−6.4±4.8−4.3−2.1
BH to their forehand · serve +1−4.8±5.8−5.2+0.4

Lleyton Hewitt

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+7.7±5.6+4.5+3.2
BH to the middle · return+6.3±2.5+2.9+3.4
BH to their forehand · return +1+6.0±6.5+3.6+2.4
FH to their forehand · return+5.4±5.1+2.6+2.8
FH to their forehand · rally+5.1±3.3+0.5+4.7
BH volley to their forehand · rally+4.2±8.4+3.9+0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · return−7.2±4.2−3.5−3.7
FH volley to their forehand · rally−6.4±7.7+1.7−8.1
BH slice to the middle · return +1−4.1±3.2−3.0−1.1
FH volley to their backhand · rally−3.7±7.8−0.4−3.3
BH to their forehand · serve +1−3.5±5.3−1.8−1.7

Against Lleyton Hewitt-like opponents

Lorenzo Sonego vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–64.1%31.7%
Players most similar to Lleyton Hewitt2 55.5%46.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: David Goffin, Andy Murray, Marcos Baghdatis, David Nalbandian, Nicolas Kiefer, Arnaud Clement, Sebastien Grosjean, Yevgeny Kafelnikov, Magnus Norman, Michael Chang. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.