RallyIQ

Game plan

Mariano Navone v Federico Coria

Every number combines what Mariano Navone does well with what Federico Coria allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Mariano Navone wins, best of 3 66%90%: 30%–91% · best of 5: 69%
Serve points won 60.5% / 57.4% Mariano / Federico · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 66%serve 60.5% / 57.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Mariano Navone's record against Federico Coria's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMarianoFederico
Direction choice−0.01 ±0.09
better than 54%
−0.34 ±0.20
better than 4%
Shot selection−0.08 ±0.23
better than 43%
+0.03 ±0.29
better than 55%
Execution+0.24 ±0.59
better than 77%
−0.60 ±0.80
better than 41%
Points left on the table2.33 ±0.12
lower than 81%
2.98 ±0.32
lower than 20%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Mariano Navone serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMariano winsv FedericoMatchupOptimal
Wide32%64%69%60.0%±10.433%
Body18%50%67%53.2%±13.85% ▼
T49%65%81%72.8%±8.962% ▲

Optimal v Federico Coria: +0.9±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +7.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMariano winsv FedericoMatchupOptimal
Wide52%62%64%52.9%±9.553%
Body20%59%69%66.0%±12.57% ▼
T27%67%72%66.7%±11.040% ▲

Optimal v Federico Coria: +0.3±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +7.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Federico Coria serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFederico winsv MarianoMatchupOptimal
Wide34%61%69%56.0%±9.634%
Body15%62%61%59.8%±14.528% ▲
T51%60%64%47.7%±9.838% ▼

Optimal v Mariano Navone: +0.3±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +7.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFederico winsv MarianoMatchupOptimal
Wide57%65%61%51.9%±8.944% ▼
Body6%56%51%43.8%±16.56%
T37%69%64%61.2%±10.550% ▲

Optimal v Mariano Navone: +0.6±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Mariano Navone returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3+1.2−0.6+4.9±3.0
FH crosscourt22%+5.5−0.1+2.3+7.7±4.4
FH down the line17%+1.7±0.0+1.2+2.8±4.4
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.1−0.1−4.4±2.0
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−0.3±0.0−4.6±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.0±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (237 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+1.7+0.9+8.9±2.7
BH crosscourt40%+8.8+0.1−0.3+8.6±3.5
BH down the line11%+4.2+1.6+1.7+7.5±4.5
BH slice through the middle3%−4.2−0.3+1.3−3.2±2.2

Lean BH through the middle: +0.7±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (268 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5+1.2−1.3−3.6±2.9
FH crosscourt32%−0.2+1.8+0.6+2.2±4.2
FH down the line21%−1.8−1.8−0.6−4.2±4.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.1±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (84 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
BH crosscourt49%+1.0+0.5+0.1+1.7±3.1
BH through the middle45%−2.9−0.1+0.6−2.3±2.6
BH down the line6%−0.2−0.2+0.8+0.4±3.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.9±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (153 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Federico Coria returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
FH through the middle58%+4.3+3.0+2.7+10.0±3.0
FH down the line24%+1.7−1.0+1.3+2.0±4.4
FH crosscourt18%+5.5+2.1+4.9+12.5±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (114 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+1.5+1.9+9.8±2.5
BH crosscourt36%+8.8−0.2+1.7+10.3±3.3
BH down the line12%+4.2+0.7+2.2+7.1±4.4
BH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.1+0.1−5.2±1.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.6±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (147 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
FH through the middle60%−3.5−0.5+1.6−2.3±2.8
FH down the line28%−1.8−1.5−2.0−5.4±4.3
FH crosscourt12%−0.2−0.5+2.3+1.5±3.6

Lean FH through the middle: +0.4±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (43 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
BH through the middle41%−2.9−0.3−0.4−3.6±2.6
BH crosscourt26%+1.0−0.5+1.5+2.0±3.3
FH through the middle16%−2.9+1.2+1.6−0.1±2.4
FH inside-out9%+1.0+0.6−2.0−0.5±3.4
BH down the line7%−0.2−0.6+0.3−0.5±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.1±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (140 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Mariano Navone

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+3.5±2.3+1.2+2.3
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.6±4.4+0.8+1.8
BH to the middle · return +1+2.4±2.6+2.6−0.2
BH to their backhand · return+1.8±3.1+0.4+1.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.5±3.9−1.1+2.6
BH to their backhand · return +1+1.3±3.3+0.5+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.5±3.3−0.4−2.1
FH to the middle · rally−1.9±2.2+0.8−2.7
FH to the middle · serve +1−1.1±2.7−0.2−0.9
FH to their backhand · rally−1.0±2.5−1.3+0.4
FH to their forehand · rally−0.1±2.7−0.2+0.1

Federico Coria

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return+4.5±2.6+2.2+2.3
BH to their backhand · return+4.2±3.0+0.6+3.6
BH to the middle · return+3.7±2.2+0.6+3.1
FH to their backhand · return +1+3.2±4.1+0.4+2.8
BH to the middle · return +1+1.4±2.5−0.3+1.7
BH to their backhand · rally+1.1±2.2−0.2+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−4.3±3.3−1.8−2.4
FH to their forehand · rally−3.2±2.8−1.6−1.6
BH to their forehand · rally−3.2±3.8−1.5−1.7
FH to their backhand · rally−2.8±2.6−2.4−0.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.3±4.0±0.0−2.3

Against Federico Coria-like opponents

Mariano Navone vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–55.5%43.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Gael Monfils, Roberto Bautista Agut, Pedro Martinez, Nuno Borges, Daniel Elahi Galan, Mackenzie Mcdonald, Juan Pablo Varillas, Nikolay Davydenko, Juan Carlos Ferrero. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.