RallyIQ

Game plan

Michael Stich v Rafael Nadal

Every number combines what Michael Stich does well with what Rafael Nadal allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Michael Stich wins, best of 3 4%90%: 1%–9% · best of 5: 1%
Serve points won 55.9% / 69.9% Michael / Rafael · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 4%serve 55.9% / 69.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Michael Stich's record against Rafael Nadal's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMichaelRafael
Direction choice−0.23 ±0.10
better than 10%
+0.02 ±0.03
better than 62%
Shot selection+0.53 ±0.16
better than 95%
+0.38 ±0.05
better than 85%
Execution−1.39 ±0.40
better than 13%
+1.32 ±0.10
better than 99%
Points left on the table4.51 ±0.30
lower than 2%
2.66 ±0.04
lower than 43%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Michael Stich serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMichael winsv RafaelMatchupOptimal
Wide40%77%66%71.1%±3.353% ▲
Body10%60%58%54.7%±6.70% ▼
T51%80%74%79.2%±2.847% ▼

Optimal v Rafael Nadal: +0.7±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +5.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMichael winsv RafaelMatchupOptimal
Wide41%77%71%75.4%±3.154% ▲
Body8%68%57%62.4%±7.30% ▼
T51%75%66%69.1%±3.246% ▼

Optimal v Rafael Nadal: +0.7±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +4.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Rafael Nadal serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRafael winsv MichaelMatchupOptimal
Wide31%75%75%76.3%±2.844% ▲
Body18%64%71%71.5%±4.55% ▼
T51%69%77%71.2%±3.451%

Optimal v Michael Stich: +0.5±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRafael winsv MichaelMatchupOptimal
Wide54%71%77%75.3%±2.967% ▲
Body18%67%70%73.4%±4.85% ▼
T28%75%75%77.5%±3.128%

Optimal v Michael Stich: +0.1±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Michael Stich returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RafaelValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3−1.1−0.9+2.3±1.4
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+1.1+1.7+8.3±2.7
FH down the line20%+1.7−1.3+0.1+0.5±3.0
FH slice through the middle2%−4.2−1.0±0.0−5.2±1.9
BH slice through the middle1%−1.6+0.5+1.9+0.8±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.2±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (949 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RafaelValue
BH slice through the middle26%−4.2−2.0+1.9−4.3±1.5
BH through the middle26%+6.4−4.8+0.7+2.3±1.5
BH slice crosscourt20%+0.5−1.5+3.6+2.6±2.1
BH crosscourt11%+8.8−1.0+4.3+12.1±2.5
BH down the line10%+4.2±0.0−1.0+3.2±3.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +11.0±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (1006 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RafaelValue
FH through the middle35%−3.5−0.3−0.4−4.2±2.1
FH down the line32%−1.8−1.7+0.4−3.1±3.6
FH crosscourt25%−0.2−0.5−0.7−1.5±3.3
BH through the middle3%+0.1−0.4+0.1−0.2±1.2
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7+0.9+0.1−11.6±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.7±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (279 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RafaelValue
BH through the middle37%−2.9−0.1+0.1−2.8±1.5
BH crosscourt21%+1.0+1.2−0.2+2.0±2.3
BH down the line19%−0.2−2.1−1.3−3.6±3.6
BH slice crosscourt11%−4.0±0.0−2.6−6.6±2.6
BH slice through the middle8%−11.3−1.2−0.9−13.4±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.5±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (639 returns charted)

Rafael Nadal returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MichaelValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3+0.4−1.9+2.7±1.5
FH crosscourt31%+5.5+2.4−2.3+5.6±2.5
FH down the line16%+1.7−0.8+2.3+3.1±3.0
FH slice through the middle3%−4.2+0.1+1.1−3.0±1.8
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+7.5±0.0+3.1±1.9
BH inside-out0%+6.3+1.4+1.9+9.7±3.4

Lean BH inside-out: +6.2±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (5711 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MichaelValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4−0.2−3.1+3.1±1.4
BH crosscourt19%+8.8−1.2−2.0+5.7±2.4
BH slice through the middle17%−4.2+2.1−2.0−4.1±1.6
BH down the line15%+4.2+3.3+1.9+9.5±2.9
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+5.7−0.9−3.6±2.6

Lean BH down the line: +6.8±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (9039 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MichaelValue
FH crosscourt48%−0.2+0.7−2.2−1.7±3.1
FH through the middle33%−3.5−2.6−0.6−6.7±2.0
FH down the line17%−1.8+3.8+1.7+3.8±3.9
BH inside-out1%+0.9+0.3+1.7+2.9±3.3
FH slice through the middle1%−12.7−0.2±0.0−12.8±1.3

Lean FH down the line: +6.3±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (2037 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MichaelValue
BH through the middle35%−2.9+2.0−2.5−3.4±1.1
BH crosscourt28%+1.0−1.0±0.0±0.0±1.9
BH down the line17%−0.2+1.8+1.7+3.3±2.8
FH through the middle9%−2.9+1.2−0.6−2.2±1.7
FH inside-in8%+0.6+1.5−2.2−0.1±3.4

Lean BH down the line: +4.2±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (5854 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Michael Stich

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their backhand · serve +1+7.0±5.9−0.8+7.8
BH volley to their backhand · rally+6.4±6.6+8.8−2.4
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1+6.0±6.5+4.6+1.4
FH volley to their backhand · rally+4.8±6.5+2.5+2.3
FH volley to their forehand · rally+1.8±6.5+10.2−8.4
BH to their backhand · serve +1+1.5±3.7+2.1−0.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−8.2±2.7−6.5−1.8
FH to their forehand · return +1−7.7±3.7−4.5−3.2
BH to their forehand · rally−7.7±3.7−8.5+0.8
FH volley to the middle · rally−7.6±7.5−7.5±0.0
BH slice to their backhand · return−5.3±2.9+0.1−5.5

Rafael Nadal

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their backhand · rally+13.7±7.0+10.9+2.8
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1+10.6±7.4+8.5+2.1
FH volley to their forehand · rally+9.5±6.7+2.3+7.2
BH volley to their forehand · rally+7.3±7.3+12.2−4.9
FH volley to their backhand · serve +1+5.3±6.9+5.9−0.6
BH to their forehand · return +1+5.1±4.4+4.0+1.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · return−3.2±3.1−1.9−1.3
BH to their forehand · return−2.9±3.7+2.2−5.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.6±2.6+1.0−3.5
FH to the middle · return +1−2.2±2.9−0.8−1.4
BH to the middle · return−2.0±1.6+1.9−3.9

Against Rafael Nadal-like opponents

Michael Stich vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.2%33.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Cameron Norrie, Lorenzo Musetti, Mariano Navone, Yoshihito Nishioka, Albert Ramos, Federico Delbonis, Fernando Verdasco, Juan Martin Del Potro, Nikolay Davydenko, Juan Carlos Ferrero. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.