RallyIQ

Game plan

Milos Raonic v Marc Rosset

Every number combines what Milos Raonic does well with what Marc Rosset allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Milos Raonic wins, best of 3 60%90%: 32%–84% · best of 5: 62%
Serve points won 69.4% / 67.3% Milos / Marc · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 60%serve 69.2% / 67.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Milos Raonic's record against Marc Rosset's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.1 on serve, −0.9 on return vs expectation (701 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMilosMarc
Direction choice+0.11 ±0.05
better than 82%
−0.21 ±0.21
better than 13%
Shot selection+0.70 ±0.10
better than 97%
+0.30 ±0.27
better than 79%
Execution−0.74 ±0.34
better than 35%
−0.66 ±0.55
better than 38%
Points left on the table2.59 ±0.09
lower than 50%
3.52 ±0.60
lower than 8%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Milos Raonic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMilos winsv MarcMatchupOptimal
Wide49%77%78%81.5%±5.162% ▲
Body7%74%71%79.7%±6.60% ▼
T44%85%76%85.8%±4.138% ▼

Optimal v Marc Rosset: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMilos winsv MarcMatchupOptimal
Wide55%84%68%80.3%±4.450% ▼
Body7%67%68%72.2%±10.30% ▼
T37%80%78%84.2%±4.750% ▲

Optimal v Marc Rosset: +1.1±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Marc Rosset serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMarc winsv MilosMatchupOptimal
Wide34%74%76%76.6%±5.834%
Body14%70%69%74.9%±8.01% ▼
T52%82%78%84.6%±4.265% ▲

Optimal v Milos Raonic: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMarc winsv MilosMatchupOptimal
Wide36%72%78%77.1%±6.136%
Body17%63%66%66.0%±9.24% ▼
T47%78%76%81.1%±5.160% ▲

Optimal v Milos Raonic: +0.8±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Milos Raonic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcValue
FH through the middle48%+4.3−0.8−3.5−0.1±2.3
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−3.8+1.4+3.0±3.7
FH down the line17%+1.7−2.5−3.1−4.0±3.9
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−1.8+0.2−5.8±1.9
FH slice crosscourt1%−4.3−1.3±0.0−5.7±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.3±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (1484 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcValue
BH through the middle39%+6.4−0.5−2.0+3.9±2.2
BH crosscourt24%+8.8−2.9−6.3−0.4±3.0
BH slice through the middle14%−4.2−1.5−3.0−8.7±2.2
BH down the line12%+4.2−0.9−2.0+1.3±4.0
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5−1.5−2.9−3.8±2.8

Lean BH through the middle: +4.1±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1719 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−0.4+0.7−3.2±2.6
FH crosscourt32%−0.2+0.3+2.8+2.8±4.2
FH down the line19%−1.8−1.0+2.0−0.9±4.5
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7+0.2±0.0−12.5±1.1
FH slice down the line1%−9.4−0.6±0.0−10.0±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (383 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcValue
BH through the middle38%−2.9−1.5−1.2−5.7±2.1
BH crosscourt30%+1.0−3.3+1.0−1.3±2.8
BH down the line10%−0.2+0.3+0.5+0.5±4.5
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.1+0.7−2.0±2.4
FH inside-in4%+0.6−2.7+2.8+0.6±4.4

Lean FH inside-in: +3.9±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1074 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Marc Rosset returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MilosValue
FH through the middle55%+4.3−1.7−1.3+1.3±2.4
FH down the line40%+1.7−3.4−1.5−3.2±4.0
FH crosscourt6%+5.5−2.5−3.1−0.1±3.4

Lean FH through the middle: +1.9±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (176 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MilosValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4−2.7−2.1+1.6±2.3
BH crosscourt22%+8.8−2.2−1.8+4.8±3.2
BH down the line12%+4.2−1.2−4.6−1.5±4.4
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2+0.1−0.2−4.3±2.1
BH slice crosscourt10%+0.5+1.2−0.9+0.8±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.2±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (274 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MilosValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.9−0.6−2.2±2.5
FH down the line42%−1.8−1.4−4.2−7.3±4.3
FH crosscourt11%−0.2−0.5+0.9+0.2±3.6

Lean FH through the middle: +1.9±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (62 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MilosValue
FH through the middle20%−2.9−0.9−0.6−4.3±2.1
BH through the middle19%−2.9−3.8−0.4−7.0±2.1
BH slice through the middle14%−11.3−1.4−1.1−13.8±2.3
BH slice crosscourt13%−4.0+0.6−2.0−5.4±2.4
FH inside-out13%+1.0+7.4−4.2+4.1±3.4

Lean FH inside-out: +8.7±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (200 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Milos Raonic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+7.3±5.1+4.5+2.8
BH slice to their backhand · rally+0.6±3.5−0.8+1.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1+0.5±4.2−0.5+1.0
FH to their forehand · return +1+0.1±5.5−2.6+2.6
BH to their backhand · return +1−0.8±4.3−2.9+2.1
BH to their backhand · serve +1−1.3±4.5+0.1−1.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−12.5±5.7−3.3−9.1
BH to the middle · rally−8.3±3.0−7.1−1.2
BH to their backhand · return−7.4±3.9−1.9−5.5
FH to their backhand · return−5.2±4.3−5.2±0.0
FH to their forehand · return−4.3±5.6−7.0+2.7

Marc Rosset

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.8±5.1+1.7+2.1
BH to their backhand · rally+3.0±3.3+1.3+1.7
FH to the middle · serve +1+2.7±3.4+0.6+2.0
BH to their forehand · rally+2.0±5.8+0.5+1.5
BH to the middle · rally+1.7±3.1+1.1+0.6
FH to their forehand · return +1+1.3±5.6+0.3+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return−5.3±3.1−2.4−2.9
FH to their backhand · return−4.0±4.5−0.4−3.7
BH to their forehand · return−3.7±5.9+0.4−4.2
BH to the middle · return−2.9±3.0−2.1−0.8
BH slice to the middle · return−2.9±3.0−2.2−0.7

Against Marc Rosset-like opponents

Milos Raonic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–69.9%31.3%
Players most similar to Marc Rosset5 71.5%30.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Alexei Popyrin, Lucas Pouille, Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Jack Sock, Kevin King, Tomas Berdych, Andy Roddick, James Blake, Jim Courier, Guy Forget. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.