RallyIQ

Game plan

Richard Gasquet v Sergiy Stakhovsky

Every number combines what Richard Gasquet does well with what Sergiy Stakhovsky allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Richard Gasquet wins, best of 3 46%90%: 24%–71% · best of 5: 46%
Serve points won 69.0% / 69.8% Richard / Sergiy · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 50%serve 69.1% / 69.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Richard Gasquet's record against Sergiy Stakhovsky's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −0.1 on serve, −1.6 on return vs expectation (2108 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerRichardSergiy
Direction choice+0.17 ±0.05
better than 91%
+0.03 ±0.12
better than 65%
Shot selection−0.47 ±0.11
better than 12%
−0.26 ±0.23
better than 27%
Execution+0.78 ±0.25
better than 91%
−1.63 ±0.76
better than 8%
Points left on the table2.45 ±0.09
lower than 68%
3.01 ±0.13
lower than 19%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Richard Gasquet serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRichard winsv SergiyMatchupOptimal
Wide50%68%80%76.1%±5.542% ▼
Body5%62%69%67.7%±10.60% ▼
T45%75%81%81.3%±4.758% ▲

Optimal v Sergiy Stakhovsky: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRichard winsv SergiyMatchupOptimal
Wide52%71%77%75.3%±5.544% ▼
Body5%56%66%58.7%±13.00% ▼
T43%69%76%73.5%±5.856% ▲

Optimal v Sergiy Stakhovsky: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Sergiy Stakhovsky serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSergiy winsv RichardMatchupOptimal
Wide46%73%74%73.6%±5.546%
Body14%60%70%66.3%±8.91% ▼
T40%80%78%83.1%±4.653% ▲

Optimal v Richard Gasquet: +1.1±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSergiy winsv RichardMatchupOptimal
Wide50%72%78%76.9%±4.963% ▲
Body8%62%63%62.5%±11.40% ▼
T41%73%71%71.3%±6.237% ▼

Optimal v Richard Gasquet: +0.9±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Richard Gasquet returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SergiyValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−0.4+0.5+4.3±2.3
FH crosscourt28%+5.5−2.1−0.6+2.8±3.6
FH down the line17%+1.7+3.3−1.9+3.2±4.0
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2+2.2±0.0−2.1±2.0
FH slice down the line1%−4.3+2.2±0.0−2.1±1.9

Lean FH through the middle: +0.9±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1536 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SergiyValue
BH slice through the middle30%−4.2+3.4−0.3−1.1±2.1
BH slice crosscourt22%+0.5+1.1−0.8+0.8±2.6
BH crosscourt18%+8.8−1.0+0.7+8.5±3.1
BH through the middle18%+6.4−2.2−2.6+1.6±2.4
BH slice down the line6%−8.4+2.3+0.4−5.7±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.3±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1628 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SergiyValue
FH through the middle42%−3.5+0.4−0.3−3.4±2.7
FH crosscourt37%−0.2−2.2+1.6−0.9±4.1
FH down the line17%−1.8+3.8−5.5−3.5±4.5
BH through the middle2%+0.1+0.6−0.1+0.5±1.7
FH slice through the middle1%−12.7+0.3±0.0−12.4±1.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.6±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (364 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SergiyValue
BH crosscourt36%+1.0+0.4−0.5+1.0±2.6
BH through the middle27%−2.9±0.0−0.1−3.0±2.1
BH slice crosscourt15%−4.0−0.4+0.4−4.0±2.2
BH slice through the middle11%−11.3+0.7−0.5−11.2±2.2
BH down the line7%−0.2+2.2−2.7−0.7±4.9
FH inside-in1%+0.6−0.4+1.6+1.7±4.1

Lean FH inside-in: +4.2±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1238 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Sergiy Stakhovsky returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RichardValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3−1.8+1.1+3.6±2.2
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−2.6+4.6+7.5±3.7
FH down the line17%+1.7+0.9+2.1+4.7±3.8
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2−1.0+0.7−4.5±2.1
FH slice down the line3%−4.3+1.5+3.4+0.6±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (242 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RichardValue
BH slice through the middle43%−4.2−0.9+1.6−3.5±2.0
BH slice crosscourt29%+0.5−0.3+3.4+3.7±2.8
BH through the middle14%+6.4−1.6+0.5+5.3±2.2
BH slice down the line5%−8.4+0.4−1.2−9.1±3.2
BH crosscourt5%+8.8−0.5+2.1+10.4±2.6

Lean BH through the middle: +4.8±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (245 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RichardValue
FH through the middle67%−3.5+0.4±0.0−3.0±2.5
FH crosscourt33%−0.2−2.7+1.5−1.4±3.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.1±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (45 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RichardValue
BH slice crosscourt29%−4.0−0.1−1.9−6.0±2.6
BH through the middle27%−2.9+0.8+1.0−1.1±2.0
BH crosscourt19%+1.0+1.4+2.0+4.5±2.5
BH slice through the middle14%−11.3−0.6−1.1−13.1±2.3
BH down the line11%−0.2−2.5−0.1−2.8±3.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.8±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (133 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Richard Gasquet

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally+4.0±3.5+3.4+0.6
BH to their backhand · return +1+2.8±5.1+1.7+1.2
FH to the middle · return+2.3±3.5+1.1+1.2
BH slice to the middle · return+2.3±3.1+3.6−1.3
BH to the middle · rally+1.4±3.1+2.1−0.7
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.4±4.7−1.7+3.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return−6.5±6.6−1.9−4.5
BH to their backhand · return−6.4±4.7−3.5−2.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1−4.4±5.1−1.2−3.2
FH to their forehand · rally−4.3±4.2−0.9−3.4
BH to their forehand · rally−4.1±5.7+2.7−6.8

Sergiy Stakhovsky

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1+5.4±4.4+4.7+0.8
BH to their forehand · rally+2.5±5.6+0.8+1.7
BH to their backhand · return+2.5±4.6+0.5+2.0
FH to their forehand · rally+2.3±4.5+0.9+1.4
BH slice to their backhand · return+2.2±3.9+0.3+1.9
FH to the middle · return+2.1±3.5−2.3+4.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1−6.3±6.1−6.7+0.3
FH to their forehand · return +1−4.2±5.9−2.7−1.5
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−4.2±4.0−1.8−2.3
BH to their backhand · return +1−3.5±5.3−3.9+0.4
FH to their forehand · return−3.2±6.3−7.3+4.1

Against Sergiy Stakhovsky-like opponents

Richard Gasquet vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.8%33.4%
Players most similar to Sergiy Stakhovsky13 60.0%28.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Daniel Altmaier, Pierre Hugues Herbert, Gregoire Barrere, Roger Federer, Nicolas Mahut, Mischa Zverev, Ivan Ljubicic, Andrei Pavel, Mark Philippoussis. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.