RallyIQ

Game plan

Roman Safiullin v Robin Soderling

Every number combines what Roman Safiullin does well with what Robin Soderling allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Roman Safiullin wins, best of 3 25%90%: 7%–57% · best of 5: 20%
Serve points won 66.9% / 72.6% Roman / Robin · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 25%serve 66.9% / 72.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Roman Safiullin's record against Robin Soderling's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerRomanRobin
Direction choice+0.11 ±0.07
better than 83%
−0.04 ±0.10
better than 45%
Shot selection+0.42 ±0.20
better than 88%
+0.37 ±0.15
better than 84%
Execution−0.74 ±0.73
better than 35%
−0.27 ±0.51
better than 54%
Points left on the table2.11 ±0.16
lower than 98%
2.34 ±0.15
lower than 80%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Roman Safiullin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRoman winsv RobinMatchupOptimal
Wide51%70%77%74.3%±5.964% ▲
Body7%49%67%53.4%±14.00% ▼
T42%73%76%73.5%±6.736% ▼

Optimal v Robin Soderling: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRoman winsv RobinMatchupOptimal
Wide47%75%78%80.5%±5.460% ▲
Body15%63%65%65.2%±12.22% ▼
T38%66%76%70.4%±7.338%

Optimal v Robin Soderling: +1.3±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +6.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Robin Soderling serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRobin winsv RomanMatchupOptimal
Wide46%72%73%72.1%±6.142% ▼
Body9%66%66%68.4%±11.50% ▼
T45%79%77%81.0%±5.358% ▲

Optimal v Roman Safiullin: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +5.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRobin winsv RomanMatchupOptimal
Wide48%80%74%80.7%±5.562% ▲
Body7%68%64%68.9%±12.10% ▼
T44%66%75%69.7%±7.338% ▼

Optimal v Roman Safiullin: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Roman Safiullin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobinValue
FH through the middle39%+4.3+2.3+0.3+6.9±2.7
FH crosscourt17%+5.5−0.4−1.3+3.8±4.4
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2−0.7+0.5−4.4±2.3
FH down the line10%+1.7−1.2±0.0+0.5±4.4
FH slice crosscourt10%−4.3−0.3+1.1−3.5±2.6

Lean FH through the middle: +4.9±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (282 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobinValue
BH crosscourt40%+8.8−0.3+0.6+9.1±3.4
BH through the middle39%+6.4−1.6+0.4+5.3±2.6
BH down the line8%+4.2−0.8+0.3+3.7±4.4
BH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.5+2.0−3.7±2.2
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.2±0.0+0.3±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.4±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (323 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobinValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.5−1.8−3.8±2.8
FH crosscourt32%−0.2−2.4+0.4−2.3±4.3
FH down the line15%−1.8−0.8−0.3−2.9±4.2
FH slice crosscourt7%−12.5−2.2±0.0−14.7±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.6±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (75 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobinValue
BH crosscourt51%+1.0−1.7+1.2+0.5±3.1
BH through the middle38%−2.9−1.5−0.1−4.5±2.4
BH down the line10%−0.2+0.4+0.8+1.0±4.7

Lean BH down the line: +2.3±4.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (175 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Robin Soderling returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RomanValue
FH down the line46%+1.7−0.1+1.2+2.8±4.2
FH through the middle44%+4.3+0.9+0.9+6.1±2.7
FH crosscourt7%+5.5−0.5+3.0+7.9±4.3
FH slice through the middle2%−4.2±0.0−0.5−4.7±2.0
FH slice down the line1%−4.3−0.3+1.9−2.6±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.5±4.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (369 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RomanValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+0.9+0.6+7.9±2.5
BH down the line21%+4.2−0.2±0.0+4.0±4.5
BH crosscourt20%+8.8+0.2+0.2+9.2±3.5
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−0.6−0.8−5.6±2.5
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5+0.3±0.0+0.8±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.8±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (411 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RomanValue
FH through the middle41%−3.5+1.3+1.3−0.9±2.8
FH down the line39%−1.8−5.3+0.9−6.2±4.7
FH crosscourt16%−0.2−1.4+2.1+0.5±4.2
BH inside-out4%+0.9−3.1−0.2−2.5±3.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.3±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (115 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RomanValue
BH through the middle39%−2.9+0.6+0.7−1.6±2.4
BH down the line30%−0.2−1.0−0.2−1.5±4.9
BH crosscourt28%+1.0+2.1−1.6+1.5±3.2
FH through the middle2%−2.9−0.3+1.3−1.8±1.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (266 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Roman Safiullin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1+7.9±4.0+5.9+2.0
BH to their forehand · rally+6.3±4.9+3.3+3.1
FH to the middle · return+4.8±3.8+5.6−0.8
FH to their forehand · return +1+4.3±5.3+3.4+0.8
FH to their backhand · rally+3.8±3.7+4.4−0.6
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.6±5.0+5.4−1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−8.7±5.7−4.2−4.4
BH to the middle · rally−3.2±2.5−3.1−0.1
BH to their backhand · return +1−2.1±4.6−3.8+1.6
FH to the middle · return +1−1.8±3.5+0.6−2.4
BH to the middle · return−1.7±2.9−1.1−0.7

Robin Soderling

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+6.8±3.5+2.6+4.1
FH to the middle · return+4.0±3.6+2.0+2.0
BH to their backhand · rally+3.1±3.1−0.7+3.7
FH to the middle · rally+3.0±2.9+0.3+2.6
FH to their forehand · rally+2.6±4.4−0.2+2.8
FH to their forehand · return+2.3±5.6−1.8+4.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return−5.2±6.1−3.6−1.6
FH to their backhand · rally−3.3±4.5−6.4+3.1
BH to their forehand · rally−2.5±4.8−1.3−1.2
FH to the middle · serve +1−2.3±3.4−2.7+0.4
FH to their backhand · return +1−2.2±4.9−2.7+0.4

Against Robin Soderling-like opponents

Roman Safiullin vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.3%32.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Joao Fonseca, Hubert Hurkacz, Andrey Rublev, Alexei Popyrin, Laslo Djere, Marin Cilic, Thanasi Kokkinakis, Kyle Edmund, Tomas Berdych. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.