RallyIQ

Game plan

Sumit Nagal v Roberto Bautista Agut

Every number combines what Sumit Nagal does well with what Roberto Bautista Agut allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Sumit Nagal wins, best of 3 7%90%: 1%–27% · best of 5: 3%
Serve points won 54.5% / 65.9% Sumit / Roberto · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 7%serve 54.5% / 65.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Sumit Nagal's record against Roberto Bautista Agut's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Sumit Nagal serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSumit winsv RobertoMatchupOptimal
Wide50%68%74%69.5%±8.663% ▲
Body12%59%60%55.8%±13.70% ▼
T38%69%76%69.4%±9.937%

Optimal v Roberto Bautista Agut: +1.1±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSumit winsv RobertoMatchupOptimal
Wide67%63%77%68.1%±7.680% ▲
Body6%59%53%48.9%±14.90% ▼
T26%67%72%66.7%±11.120% ▼

Optimal v Roberto Bautista Agut: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Roberto Bautista Agut serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRoberto winsv SumitMatchupOptimal
Wide45%70%73%70.7%±9.458% ▲
Body9%64%62%62.1%±12.80% ▼
T47%72%66%62.8%±10.842% ▼

Optimal v Sumit Nagal: +0.3±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRoberto winsv SumitMatchupOptimal
Wide56%70%66%63.0%±9.951% ▼
Body9%61%63%60.1%±13.60% ▼
T36%72%74%73.9%±9.549% ▲

Optimal v Sumit Nagal: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +7.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Sumit Nagal returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobertoValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3+1.6+2.6+8.5±2.4
FH down the line24%+1.7+0.1+4.3+6.1±3.5
FH crosscourt22%+5.5+2.1−1.2+6.4±3.3

Lean FH through the middle: +1.0±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (58 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobertoValue
BH through the middle52%+6.4+0.9+1.2+8.5±2.2
BH crosscourt48%+8.8±0.0+2.2+11.0±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.3±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (52 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Roberto Bautista Agut returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SumitValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3+2.4±0.0+6.7±2.5
FH down the line19%+1.7+2.4−0.9+3.2±3.8
FH crosscourt15%+5.5+1.8+3.1+10.4±3.7
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2+0.4±0.0−3.8±1.4
FH slice crosscourt3%−4.3+0.3±0.0−4.1±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.8±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1224 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SumitValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4+2.7+2.5+11.6±2.3
BH crosscourt20%+8.8+2.4+0.6+11.8±3.2
BH slice through the middle17%−4.2−0.1±0.0−4.3±1.4
BH down the line11%+4.2+4.9+0.4+9.6±3.9
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−1.2±0.0−0.7±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.6±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (1218 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SumitValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5+0.4−0.6−3.7±2.6
FH crosscourt24%−0.2+0.7+4.1+4.6±3.7
FH down the line24%−1.8+0.9+2.1+1.2±4.5
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7±0.0±0.0−12.7±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.4±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (289 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SumitValue
BH through the middle48%−2.9+0.6+0.5−1.8±2.1
BH crosscourt33%+1.0+1.7−0.1+2.6±2.7
BH down the line12%−0.2+0.8−0.9−0.3±4.0
FH through the middle3%−2.9−0.4−0.6−3.9±2.2
FH inside-out2%+1.0±0.0+2.1+3.0±3.4

Lean FH inside-out: +3.2±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (961 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Sumit Nagal

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally+6.4±3.7+6.3±0.0
FH to the middle · rally+4.4±2.9+2.3+2.1
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.9±4.6±0.0+2.9
FH to the middle · return+2.5±3.4+0.7+1.8
BH to the middle · rally+2.2±2.7+2.0+0.2
BH to their backhand · rally+0.6±3.2−0.3+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1−5.8±4.9−5.0−0.7
FH to their forehand · rally+0.4±3.6±0.0+0.4
BH to their backhand · rally+0.6±3.2−0.3+0.9
BH to the middle · rally+2.2±2.7+2.0+0.2
FH to the middle · return+2.5±3.4+0.7+1.8

Roberto Bautista Agut

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally+5.4±3.9+3.1+2.4
BH to the middle · return+4.7±3.1+1.5+3.2
BH to their backhand · rally+4.7±3.3+1.2+3.4
BH to their backhand · return+3.4±3.9+1.4+2.0
BH to the middle · rally+1.8±2.6+1.6+0.2
FH to their backhand · rally+0.4±3.7−0.1+0.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · rally−0.4±3.0+1.3−1.7
FH to their backhand · rally+0.4±3.7−0.1+0.5
BH to the middle · rally+1.8±2.6+1.6+0.2
BH to their backhand · return+3.4±3.9+1.4+2.0
BH to their backhand · rally+4.7±3.3+1.2+3.4

Against Roberto Bautista Agut-like opponents

Sumit Nagal vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–54.5%39.9%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Casper Ruud, Brandon Nakashima, Gael Monfils, Mariano Navone, Novak Djokovic, Karen Khachanov, Pablo Carreno Busta, Francisco Cerundolo, Roberto Carballes Baena, Bernabe Zapata Miralles. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.