RallyIQ

Game plan

Todd Martin v Goran Ivanisevic

Every number combines what Todd Martin does well with what Goran Ivanisevic allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Todd Martin wins, best of 3 47%90%: 34%–61% · best of 5: 47%
Serve points won 69.0% / 69.5% Todd / Goran · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 51%serve 68.7% / 68.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Todd Martin's record against Goran Ivanisevic's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.2 on serve, −1.6 on return vs expectation (656 points); head-to-head: +4.5 on serve, −11.3 on return vs expectation (190 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerToddGoran
Direction choice+0.03 ±0.11
better than 64%
−0.30 ±0.08
better than 5%
Shot selection+0.31 ±0.16
better than 81%
+0.24 ±0.16
better than 75%
Execution−0.61 ±0.46
better than 40%
−0.76 ±0.38
better than 34%
Points left on the table3.44 ±0.26
lower than 9%
4.76 ±0.30
lower than 1%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Todd Martin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowTodd winsv GoranMatchupOptimal
Wide42%80%79%84.7%±3.252% ▲
Body10%64%68%68.4%±8.10% ▼
T47%78%84%86.5%±3.048%

Optimal v Goran Ivanisevic: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowTodd winsv GoranMatchupOptimal
Wide44%72%78%77.5%±4.357% ▲
Body13%62%63%61.5%±8.50% ▼
T43%71%78%77.3%±4.243%

Optimal v Goran Ivanisevic: +1.0±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Goran Ivanisevic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowGoran winsv ToddMatchupOptimal
Wide43%82%78%85.9%±3.056% ▲
Body5%63%62%62.0%±10.20% ▼
T53%81%76%82.0%±3.644% ▼

Optimal v Todd Martin: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowGoran winsv ToddMatchupOptimal
Wide54%81%76%83.5%±3.467% ▲
Body3%66%58%61.0%±11.60% ▼
T43%88%70%87.1%±3.033% ▼

Optimal v Todd Martin: +0.4±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Todd Martin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GoranValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3−2.0−1.9+0.4±2.2
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−1.3+1.8+6.0±3.7
FH down the line25%+1.7−2.0−4.4−4.8±4.2
FH slice through the middle1%−4.2+0.1−3.2−7.2±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.5±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (583 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GoranValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4−2.2−2.0+2.2±2.2
BH crosscourt25%+8.8+2.4−1.2+10.0±3.3
BH down the line16%+4.2+1.7−4.7+1.2±4.2
BH slice crosscourt10%+0.5−1.9+6.7+5.3±2.9
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−1.3−2.0−7.5±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.1±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (509 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GoranValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5−1.8−2.8−8.1±2.4
FH crosscourt29%−0.2+3.7+0.6+4.1±3.8
FH down the line27%−1.8+0.9−6.2−7.0±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +8.3±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (217 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GoranValue
BH through the middle35%−2.9−1.6−1.1−5.5±2.0
BH crosscourt34%+1.0+1.2−0.5+1.7±2.8
BH down the line21%−0.2−3.4+1.6−2.1±4.4
BH slice crosscourt6%−4.0−1.0−2.0−7.0±2.4
BH slice through the middle3%−11.3±0.0−0.6−11.9±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.5±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (324 returns charted)

Goran Ivanisevic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ToddValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3−3.9−2.3−2.0±2.2
FH down the line25%+1.7−3.1+1.9+0.5±3.9
FH crosscourt22%+5.5+0.8+3.3+9.7±3.8
BH slice through the middle1%−1.6−0.2−2.3−4.1±1.8
BH inside-in1%+7.7±0.0−0.1+7.7±3.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +8.4±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (827 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ToddValue
BH slice through the middle27%−4.2−1.7−2.3−8.2±1.9
BH through the middle23%+6.4−6.1−3.9−3.5±2.1
BH down the line16%+4.2−6.9−1.3−4.0±3.9
BH slice crosscourt12%+0.5−2.2+2.9+1.2±2.8
BH slice down the line11%−8.4+2.6+0.1−5.6±3.1
BH crosscourt10%+8.8−4.6−0.1+4.1±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.8±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1565 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ToddValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5−1.3+1.3−3.5±2.5
FH crosscourt35%−0.2+2.9−0.8+1.8±4.1
FH down the line16%−1.8+3.8−0.9+1.2±4.7
BH inside-in1%+2.5−0.6+1.9+3.7±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.6±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (355 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ToddValue
BH through the middle48%−2.9−1.7+1.1−3.4±1.8
BH down the line21%−0.2+1.4−1.0+0.2±4.0
BH crosscourt20%+1.0−3.6+1.9−0.7±2.9
FH through the middle3%−2.9−0.4+1.3−2.0±2.3
BH slice through the middle3%−11.3−0.5+1.1−10.6±2.4
FH inside-out2%+1.0+4.6−0.9+4.7±3.6

Lean FH inside-out: +6.8±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (1106 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Todd Martin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1+8.7±6.1+2.4+6.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally+4.2±3.0+0.2+4.0
BH to their forehand · return +1+2.1±5.9+2.0+0.1
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.2±4.5−0.8+2.0
FH to their forehand · return +1+0.8±4.9+1.3−0.5
BH to their backhand · serve +1+0.4±4.2+2.3−2.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return +1−11.6±3.5−5.7−5.9
FH volley to the middle · serve +1−11.4±6.0−5.2−6.2
BH slice to their backhand · return−8.0±3.7−2.5−5.5
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−7.3±3.9−2.7−4.6
FH to the middle · return +1−6.9±3.8−2.9−4.0

Goran Ivanisevic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · return+10.9±4.5+6.6+4.3
BH slice to the middle · rally+7.3±3.0+2.7+4.5
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1+4.4±7.1+4.6−0.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.9±3.9−1.0+3.9
FH to their backhand · return +1+2.5±4.4−1.9+4.4
FH volley to their backhand · serve +1+2.3±6.1−2.1+4.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return +1−10.8±3.4−5.4−5.4
FH to their forehand · return +1−10.4±4.8−9.2−1.1
FH to their forehand · rally−7.9±3.5−6.4−1.5
FH volley to their forehand · serve +1−7.7±7.1−10.1+2.4
BH to the middle · return−7.6±1.9−5.7−1.9

Against Goran Ivanisevic-like opponents

Todd Martin vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–65.1%34.0%
Players most similar to Goran Ivanisevic2 65.2%35.8%
Goran Ivanisevic (charted head-to-head)1 71.0%21.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Mardy Fish, Andrei Pavel, Mark Philippoussis, Boris Becker, Michael Stich, Malivai Washington, Guy Forget, David Wheaton, John Mcenroe. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head