RallyIQ

Game plan

Tomas Berdych v Francisco Cerundolo

Every number combines what Tomas Berdych does well with what Francisco Cerundolo allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Tomas Berdych wins, best of 3 27%90%: 14%–45% · best of 5: 23%
Serve points won 60.4% / 65.2% Tomas / Francisco · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 30%serve 61.0% / 65.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Tomas Berdych's record against Francisco Cerundolo's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −11.6 on serve, −4.3 on return vs expectation (138 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerTomasFrancisco
Direction choice+0.03 ±0.05
better than 65%
+0.11 ±0.06
better than 82%
Shot selection+0.23 ±0.08
better than 74%
+0.26 ±0.12
better than 76%
Execution−0.28 ±0.28
better than 53%
−0.40 ±0.49
better than 48%
Points left on the table2.33 ±0.07
lower than 82%
2.23 ±0.08
lower than 89%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Tomas Berdych serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowTomas winsv FranciscoMatchupOptimal
Wide48%77%72%76.3%±3.561% ▲
Body10%62%62%61.2%±8.20% ▼
T42%77%70%72.4%±4.139% ▼

Optimal v Francisco Cerundolo: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowTomas winsv FranciscoMatchupOptimal
Wide43%75%68%71.1%±4.130% ▼
Body7%65%61%63.7%±9.07%
T50%73%67%68.8%±4.563% ▲

Optimal v Francisco Cerundolo: +0.2±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Francisco Cerundolo serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFrancisco winsv TomasMatchupOptimal
Wide44%65%76%68.2%±4.157% ▲
Body16%61%68%65.5%±6.73% ▼
T40%69%80%74.8%±4.040%

Optimal v Tomas Berdych: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFrancisco winsv TomasMatchupOptimal
Wide52%63%79%70.5%±3.952%
Body16%66%60%63.5%±7.83% ▼
T32%67%76%71.6%±4.645% ▲

Optimal v Tomas Berdych: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Tomas Berdych returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FranciscoValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3+1.8+1.8+7.8±1.8
FH down the line26%+1.7−0.7+4.2+5.2±3.2
FH crosscourt17%+5.5+0.4+3.0+8.9±3.6
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2−0.2+0.8−3.6±2.4
FH slice down the line2%−4.3+1.5+1.1−1.7±3.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.4±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1497 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FranciscoValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4−0.3+0.7+6.8±1.7
BH crosscourt21%+8.8+0.4+1.5+10.7±2.3
BH slice through the middle15%−4.2+0.1−0.3−4.4±2.2
BH down the line14%+4.2+2.8+1.7+8.7±4.1
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5+0.6−0.8+0.3±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.8±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1553 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FranciscoValue
FH through the middle49%−3.5−0.1+1.3−2.2±2.4
FH crosscourt27%−0.2+1.5+6.4+7.6±4.3
FH down the line24%−1.8+2.1−1.0−0.6±4.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.8±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (336 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FranciscoValue
BH through the middle40%−2.9+0.5+0.2−2.2±1.8
BH crosscourt34%+1.0±0.0+0.2+1.2±2.3
BH down the line20%−0.2+0.3−2.4−2.3±4.5
BH slice through the middle2%−11.3−2.7±0.0−14.0±2.1
BH slice crosscourt2%−4.0−0.8−0.7−5.5±1.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.5±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (992 returns charted)

Francisco Cerundolo returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TomasValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3+0.8−0.9+4.1±1.9
FH crosscourt25%+5.5+0.1−0.7+4.9±3.6
FH down the line15%+1.7−0.4−1.9−0.6±3.7
FH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.1+2.2−3.1±2.1
FH slice down the line4%−4.3−1.2+0.5−4.9±3.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.6±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (715 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TomasValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4−0.8−1.9+3.7±1.8
BH crosscourt29%+8.8−1.2+0.4+8.0±2.7
BH down the line12%+4.2+3.1−1.5+5.8±4.3
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2−2.6+0.7−6.1±2.1
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−1.6+1.4+0.3±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (857 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TomasValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.8+1.6−0.1±2.4
FH crosscourt35%−0.2+2.4+1.0+3.2±4.1
FH down the line18%−1.8−0.7+1.7−0.9±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.3±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (152 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TomasValue
BH crosscourt38%+1.0−1.2+0.5+0.4±2.2
BH through the middle37%−2.9−1.0−0.1−4.0±1.7
BH down the line7%−0.2−3.7+1.3−2.6±4.5
FH through the middle7%−2.9+1.0+1.6−0.4±2.1
FH inside-out6%+1.0−1.1+1.7+1.5±3.3

Lean FH inside-out: +2.9±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (564 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Tomas Berdych

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1+5.7±4.4+4.1+1.6
FH volley to their forehand · rally+5.1±8.3+0.1+5.0
FH to their forehand · return+4.4±4.6−1.0+5.4
FH to the middle · return+3.6±2.2+1.2+2.5
BH to their forehand · return+1.6±5.1+0.9+0.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1+1.5±3.0+0.3+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · rally−8.5±4.9−6.3−2.2
BH slice to their backhand · rally−6.0±2.9−5.5−0.5
BH slice to the middle · rally−6.0±2.9−2.6−3.4
BH to their forehand · return +1−5.8±5.8+1.0−6.8
FH slice to their backhand · rally−5.8±5.4−6.1+0.4

Francisco Cerundolo

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+8.7±3.5+3.7+5.0
BH to their forehand · return +1+5.6±6.2+0.5+5.1
BH to their forehand · return+5.1±5.0+4.4+0.7
BH to their forehand · serve +1+4.8±5.8+2.6+2.2
FH volley to their forehand · rally+4.3±8.1+1.6+2.7
FH to their forehand · rally+3.8±2.3+1.0+2.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · rally−5.4±2.9−6.0+0.5
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−3.9±3.6−3.5−0.4
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.8±2.8−3.6−0.2
BH to the middle · return +1−3.0±2.6+0.3−3.2
FH to the middle · serve +1−2.5±2.9−1.3−1.3

Against Francisco Cerundolo-like opponents

Tomas Berdych vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.7%31.7%
Players most similar to Francisco Cerundolo1 52.1%30.8%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Casper Ruud, Carlos Alcaraz, Tommy Paul, Guy Den Ouden, Roberto Bautista Agut, Thiago Seyboth Wild, Luca Nardi, Kei Nishikori, Radu Albot, Pablo Andujar. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.