RallyIQ

Game plan

Yevgeny Kafelnikov v Kei Nishikori

Every number combines what Yevgeny Kafelnikov does well with what Kei Nishikori allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Yevgeny Kafelnikov wins, best of 3 42%90%: 18%–69% · best of 5: 40%
Serve points won 61.3% / 62.9% Yevgeny / Kei · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 42%serve 61.3% / 62.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Yevgeny Kafelnikov's record against Kei Nishikori's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerYevgenyKei
Direction choice+0.30 ±0.06
better than 98%
+0.06 ±0.05
better than 73%
Shot selection−0.27 ±0.14
better than 26%
−0.30 ±0.07
better than 23%
Execution−0.55 ±0.29
better than 42%
−0.05 ±0.28
better than 66%
Points left on the table2.43 ±0.15
lower than 70%
2.29 ±0.07
lower than 85%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Yevgeny Kafelnikov serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowYevgeny winsv KeiMatchupOptimal
Wide51%72%71%70.3%±3.445% ▼
Body7%66%65%67.0%±7.50% ▼
T42%76%76%77.4%±3.555% ▲

Optimal v Kei Nishikori: +0.2±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowYevgeny winsv KeiMatchupOptimal
Wide50%73%74%74.2%±3.644% ▼
Body6%63%61%60.9%±8.70% ▼
T43%69%74%71.0%±3.956% ▲

Optimal v Kei Nishikori: +0.3±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Kei Nishikori serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKei winsv YevgenyMatchupOptimal
Wide42%70%76%72.7%±3.642%
Body16%62%60%59.1%±7.73% ▼
T42%73%79%77.3%±3.455% ▲

Optimal v Yevgeny Kafelnikov: +1.2±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +4.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKei winsv YevgenyMatchupOptimal
Wide47%70%75%71.5%±3.960% ▲
Body17%63%62%62.1%±7.74% ▼
T36%68%72%68.7%±4.236%

Optimal v Yevgeny Kafelnikov: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Yevgeny Kafelnikov returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KeiValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3−1.0+0.7+4.0±1.7
FH down the line28%+1.7+1.7+2.3+5.6±3.2
FH crosscourt25%+5.5−0.6+0.1+5.0±3.2
BH through the middle1%+6.6−0.1+0.7+7.1±1.8

Lean FH down the line: +0.9±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (998 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KeiValue
BH through the middle28%+6.4−1.2+0.7+5.9±1.8
BH crosscourt25%+8.8−2.0+1.8+8.5±2.5
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2−0.2±0.0−4.4±1.9
BH slice crosscourt12%+0.5+0.4+0.7+1.6±2.6
BH down the line10%+4.2−0.6+2.0+5.6±4.2
FH through the middle2%+7.7+0.3+0.7+8.8±1.8

Lean FH through the middle: +5.2±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1105 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KeiValue
FH down the line34%−1.8−0.4+1.7−0.5±4.0
FH through the middle34%−3.5−0.1−0.3−3.9±2.3
FH crosscourt29%−0.2−4.3−0.4−4.9±3.7
BH through the middle2%+0.1+1.3+1.1+2.5±1.4
BH inside-out1%+0.9−1.2−0.5−0.8±3.1

Lean FH down the line: +2.3±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (473 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KeiValue
BH crosscourt44%+1.0−1.3+1.3+1.0±1.9
BH through the middle25%−2.9−1.3+1.1−3.1±1.7
BH down the line17%−0.2+2.1−0.5+1.4±4.1
BH slice crosscourt5%−4.0−1.5+0.4−5.1±2.6
BH slice through the middle4%−11.3−1.7±0.0−13.0±2.4

Lean BH down the line: +2.4±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (1049 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Kei Nishikori returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YevgenyValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3−1.1−0.1+3.0±1.6
FH crosscourt24%+5.5+1.1−1.9+4.7±3.2
FH down the line19%+1.7+1.2−0.4+2.5±3.3
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2+1.6+0.5−2.1±2.3
FH slice down the line3%−4.3+0.4−2.1−5.9±3.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.1±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1224 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YevgenyValue
BH crosscourt29%+8.8+1.9−3.6+7.1±2.6
BH through the middle24%+6.4−1.0−2.0+3.4±2.0
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2−1.9+0.6−5.6±1.8
BH slice crosscourt15%+0.5+1.4+0.4+2.2±2.5
BH slice down the line5%−8.4−1.3−0.9−10.6±3.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.3±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (1117 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YevgenyValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+0.4±0.0−3.0±2.2
FH down the line28%−1.8−3.1−0.1−5.0±4.0
FH crosscourt27%−0.2+1.0+1.2+2.0±4.0
FH slice down the line1%−9.4−0.3+0.3−9.5±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.3±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (423 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YevgenyValue
BH crosscourt47%+1.0+2.6−0.6+3.0±2.0
BH through the middle30%−2.9−0.7+0.1−3.5±1.7
BH down the line14%−0.2+2.2−2.8−0.7±4.3
FH through the middle3%−2.9−0.4±0.0−3.3±2.0
FH inside-out2%+1.0+1.4−0.1+2.2±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.0±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (845 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Yevgeny Kafelnikov

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+2.3±5.1−0.6+2.9
BH slice to their backhand · return +1+1.9±3.7+1.5+0.4
BH slice to their forehand · rally+1.8±4.4+2.9−1.1
BH to the middle · return+1.7±3.0−1.1+2.8
BH to their backhand · return+1.6±4.3−0.2+1.8
BH slice to the middle · rally+1.3±2.8+2.1−0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their backhand · rally−11.2±7.7−6.2−5.0
FH to the middle · rally−5.1±3.2−1.8−3.3
FH volley to their forehand · rally−5.0±7.7−0.9−4.2
BH to their forehand · rally−4.7±5.0−2.5−2.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1−3.6±4.7−2.2−1.4

Kei Nishikori

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+9.6±6.0+5.3+4.4
FH volley to their forehand · rally+7.9±7.7+3.3+4.6
FH to their forehand · return+6.1±5.7+3.1+3.0
FH slice to the middle · return+4.4±3.0+3.4+1.0
FH to their backhand · rally+4.1±4.2−1.0+5.1
BH to their forehand · serve +1+3.9±4.8+0.9+3.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally−8.9±7.9−3.8−5.0
FH to their forehand · rally−4.1±4.2−4.6+0.5
BH volley to their backhand · rally−3.6±5.6−2.7−0.9
BH slice to the middle · rally−3.3±2.8−4.1+0.9
FH to the middle · return +1−3.1±3.0−2.7−0.4

Against Kei Nishikori-like opponents

Yevgeny Kafelnikov vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.8%34.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Valentin Vacherot, Tommy Paul, Novak Djokovic, Karen Khachanov, Laslo Djere, Benjamin Bonzi, Roman Safiullin, Fabio Fognini, David Goffin, Mikhail Kukushkin. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.