ATP · Right-handed · 13 charted matches · 2000–2009
Nicolas Massu
Archetype: Avoids the wide serve · Ad-court slider
Against an average opponent
Serve and return points won, refitted against every opponent at once so a record built on weak or strong opposition is put on the same scale. Career, all surfaces, with a 90% margin. Raw is the plain share of points won.
Value per 100 shots
Points gained per 100 shots compared with an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for the strength of the opponents faced, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Raw is before the opponent adjustment. Built on 5,998 shots.
Shot expected value
The share of points Nicolas Massu goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side
position worth 46% to the average player · 454 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 27% | 39.0%±6.7 | 43.7% |
| BH crosscourt | 25% | 48.9%±7.2 | 47.6% |
| FH inside-out | 15% | 52.7%±8.8 | 51.8% |
| BH down the line | 7% | 37.1%±11.0 | 46.4% |
| BH slice through the middle | 7% | 34.1%±11.0 | 35.1% |
| BH slice crosscourt | 6% | 42.4%±12.0 | 42.5% |
| FH inside-in | 6% | 51.0%±12.3 | 54.7% |
| FH through the middle | 5% | 48.9%±12.8 | 45.2% |
Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side
position worth 46% to the average player · 298 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 33% | 40.1%±7.4 | 43.8% |
| BH crosscourt | 28% | 48.6%±8.1 | 48.0% |
| FH inside-out | 11% | 37.6%±11.0 | 52.6% |
| BH down the line | 7% | 47.1%±12.8 | 46.5% |
| BH slice crosscourt | 7% | 40.1%±12.6 | 42.1% |
| BH slice through the middle | 7% | 29.3%±11.7 | 35.1% |
| FH inside-in | 5% | 56.7%±13.8 | 54.3% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side
position worth 44% to the average player · 262 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 44% | 41.3%±7.0 | 46.6% |
| FH through the middle | 32% | 34.3%±7.7 | 41.5% |
| FH down the line | 25% | 37.6%±8.6 | 44.7% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle
position worth 51% to the average player · 249 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH down the line | 37% | 46.2%±7.8 | 51.5% |
| FH crosscourt | 27% | 54.6%±8.8 | 52.7% |
| FH through the middle | 20% | 42.6%±9.8 | 47.0% |
| BH through the middle | 9% | 43.7%±12.6 | 46.8% |
| FH down the line + approach | 4% | 71.3%±13.4 | 70.5% |
Serve under pressure
Pressure predictability index +13 How much less varied Nicolas Massu's first-serve direction gets on break points. Positive means easier to read. Based on 129 break-point first serves.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 34% | 21% ▼ | 63% / 73% |
| Body | 10% | 14% | 62% / 63% |
| T | 56% | 66% ▲ | 73% / 75% |
572 normal · 29 break-point 1st serves
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 60% | 72% ▲ | 64% / 73% |
| Body | 11% | 9% | 56% / 63% |
| T | 29% | 19% ▼ | 69% / 72% |
455 normal · 100 break-point 1st serves
Is the serve mix in equilibrium?
Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 33% | 54.9%±5.4 n=199 | 46% ▲ |
| Body | 10% | 55.7%±8.5 n=63 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 56% | 57.8%±4.2 n=339 | 54% ▼ |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.73).
Optimal mix: +0.2 per 100 first serves.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 62% | 57.5%±4.2 n=346 | 60% ▼ |
| Body | 10% | 51.2%±8.8 n=58 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 27% | 58.6%±6.0 n=151 | 40% ▲ |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.34).
Optimal mix: +0.5 per 100 first serves.
Exploitability 0.36 points per 100 first serves What the optimal mix would win over the current one, both courts. More exploitable than 100% of ATP servers. Tested on matches they weren't fitted on, ATP mixes picked this way win 0.33 per 100 first serves on average.
Repeating the previous direction to the same court: +3.2±3.7 points per 100 against switching. Negative means returners read repeats. Tour-wide, repeating costs women about 0.4 points per 100 and costs men nothing, so men's returners don't measurably anticipate direction. (497 repeats, 633 switches.)
Return by serve direction
Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.
| Serve | Court | Direction | Points | Won | vs tour | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Ad court | Body | 18 | 38% | +0.7±11.5 | |
| 1st | Ad court | T | 123 | 24% | −3.6±5.7 | |
| 1st | Ad court | Wide | 168 | 29% | +2.1±5.3 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Body | 40 | 43% | +6.2±9.7 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | T | 149 | 23% | −1.9±5.2 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Wide | 126 | 22% | −5.3±5.4 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Body | 35 | 49% | −0.4±10.2 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | T | 40 | 45% | −3.9±9.8 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Wide | 132 | 44% | −4.8±6.4 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Body | 77 | 48% | −0.7±7.9 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | T | 99 | 43% | −7.1±7.2 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Wide | 72 | 39% | −9.4±7.9 |
Signature patterns
Recurring sequences that win more than Nicolas Massu's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.
Serve → +1
- Wide serve (ad court) → FH inside-in used 3.1% · won 63% · +0.4±10.6 vs own baseline
- T serve (deuce court) → FH crosscourt used 3.8% · won 61% · −0.8±10.1 vs own baseline
- Wide serve (deuce court) → FH crosscourt used 3.0% · won 60% · −2.1±10.8 vs own baseline
- Wide serve (ad court) → FH down the line used 3.6% · won 58% · −3.7±10.4 vs own baseline
- Wide serve (ad court) → FH crosscourt used 6.4% · won 59% · −3.3±8.6 vs own baseline
Return
- vs wide serve (ad court) → BH crosscourt, mid used 6.2% · won 46% · +11.8±10.1 vs own baseline
- vs wide serve (deuce court) → FH through the middle, mid used 5.5% · won 39% · +4.8±10.3 vs own baseline
- vs wide serve (ad court) → BH through the middle, mid used 7.9% · won 37% · +3.4±9.1 vs own baseline
- vs wide serve (ad court) → BH through the middle, deep used 4.0% · won 37% · +3.0±11.0 vs own baseline
- vs T serve (ad court) → FH down the line, mid used 4.0% · won 37% · +3.0±11.0 vs own baseline
Rally, consecutive own shots
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 3.2% · won 49% · +9.5±10.2 vs own baseline
- FH through the middle → BH crosscourt used 2.0% · won 50% · +10.2±11.4 vs own baseline
- BH crosscourt → BH through the middle used 2.9% · won 45% · +5.4±10.4 vs own baseline
- BH through the middle → BH crosscourt used 2.5% · won 45% · +5.8±10.8 vs own baseline
- FH down the line → FH inside-out used 3.2% · won 44% · +4.9±10.1 vs own baseline
Discovered sequences
Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Nicolas Massu wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.
- Wide serve → BH through the middle return, mid → FH crosscourt used 0.9% · won 51% · +8.4±11.4 vs own baseline · +0.5 vs tour on the same sequence
- BH through the middle → FH down the line → BH crosscourt used 0.5% · won 52% · +8.7±12.7 vs own baseline · +18.0 vs tour on the same sequence
- T serve → BH through the middle return, mid → FH crosscourt used 0.5% · won 51% · +7.6±12.9 vs own baseline · +7.9 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Marat Safin (4/6)
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH through the middle used 0.8% · won 49% · +5.5±11.5 vs own baseline · +8.6 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Juan Carlos Ferrero (3/6)
- FH down the line → BH through the middle → FH down the line used 0.7% · won 46% · +3.2±12.0 vs own baseline · −2.7 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Guillermo Coria (2/8)
- FH down the line → BH through the middle → FH crosscourt used 0.6% · won 46% · +3.1±12.2 vs own baseline · −4.6 vs tour on the same sequence
Strengths and vulnerabilities
Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.
Hurts opponents most with
| Wide 2nd serve · ad court | +0.2 | 156 |
| FH to their forehand · serve +1 | ±0.0 | 196 |
| FH to the middle · return | −0.1 | 209 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | −0.2 | 386 |
| T 1st serve · ad court | −0.3 | 151 |
Most exposed to
| T 1st serve · ad court | −2.3 | 201 |
| BH to the middle · return | −1.0 | 255 |
| FH to the middle · return | −0.9 | 147 |
| BH to their backhand · return | −0.5 | 215 |
| FH to their backhand · rally | −0.5 | 419 |
Active players who are best at the shot in the top weakness: Reilly Opelka, Milos Raonic, Nick Kyrgios, Nicolas Jarry, Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Tactical fingerprint
Each bar shows how far a style trait is from the ATP average, in standard deviations.
| Forehand share | 63% | |
| Wide serves · ad | 62% | |
| T serves · deuce | 56% | |
| Run-around forehands | 35% | |
| Through the middle | 29% | |
| Avg rally length | 4.2 | |
| Backhand slice | 24% | |
| FH down the line | 31% | |
| Deep returns | 25% | |
| Serve & volley | 2% | |
| Unforced errors / shot | 9.2% | |
| Points at net | 8% | |
| 1st serve in | 59% | |
| Chipped returns | 9% | |
| Point-ending shots | 19.7% | |
| Drop shots / shot | 0.5% | |
| BH down the line | 14% | |
| Wide serves · deuce | 33% | |
| T serves · ad | 27% |
Plays most like
- Pablo Cuevas 2015–2021 plan v
- Juncheng Shang 2024–2026 plan v
- Daniel Elahi Galan 2020–2025 plan v
- Cristian Garin 2018–2025 plan v
- Albert Ramos 2014–2025 plan v
- Cameron Norrie 2015–2026 plan v
- Marton Fucsovics 2018–2026 plan v
- Jelle Sels 2018–2025 plan v
Closest from another era
- Juncheng Shang 2024–2026
- Daniel Elahi Galan 2020–2025
- Cristian Garin 2018–2025
Charted matches
- Fernando Gonzalez v Nicolas Massu L US Open R128 · Hard · 1 Sep 2009
- Nicolas Massu v Marat Safin L Hamburg Masters R64 · Clay · 17 May 2007
- Marat Safin v Nicolas Massu L Davis Cup World Group R1 RR · Clay · 9 Feb 2007
- Novak Djokovic v Nicolas Massu L Australian Open R128 · Hard · 15 Jan 2007
- Novak Djokovic v Nicolas Massu Amersfoort F · Clay · 23 Jul 2006
- Roger Federer v Nicolas Massu L Roland Garros R32 · Clay · 2 Jun 2006
- Roger Federer v Nicolas Massu L Indian Wells Masters R64 · Hard · 14 Mar 2006
- Nicolas Massu v Mardy Fish W Olympics F · Hard · 22 Aug 2004
- Nicolas Massu v Gaston Gaudio W Kitzbuhel F · Clay · 25 Jul 2004
- Juan Carlos Ferrero v Nicolas Massu L Madrid Masters F · Hard · 19 Oct 2003
- Guillermo Coria v Nicolas Massu L Kitzbuhel F · Clay · 27 Jul 2003
- Marcelo Rios v Nicolas Massu L US Open R128 · Hard · 28 Aug 2000