RallyIQ

Game plan

Francisco Cerundolo v Federico Coria

Every number combines what Francisco Cerundolo does well with what Federico Coria allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Francisco Cerundolo wins, best of 3 82%90%: 50%–96% · best of 5: 87%
Serve points won 62.6% / 55.6% Francisco / Federico · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 85%serve 63.1% / 55.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Francisco Cerundolo's record against Federico Coria's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −3.5 on serve, −8.4 on return vs expectation (228 points); head-to-head: −5.6 on serve, +1.7 on return vs expectation (148 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerFranciscoFederico
Direction choice+0.11 ±0.06
better than 82%
−0.34 ±0.20
better than 4%
Shot selection+0.26 ±0.12
better than 76%
+0.03 ±0.29
better than 55%
Execution−0.40 ±0.49
better than 48%
−0.60 ±0.80
better than 41%
Points left on the table2.23 ±0.08
lower than 89%
2.98 ±0.32
lower than 20%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Francisco Cerundolo serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFrancisco winsv FedericoMatchupOptimal
Wide44%65%69%60.9%±8.731% ▼
Body16%61%67%64.6%±11.716%
T40%69%81%76.3%±7.553% ▲

Optimal v Federico Coria: +0.3±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +8.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFrancisco winsv FedericoMatchupOptimal
Wide52%63%64%53.9%±8.439% ▼
Body16%66%69%72.2%±10.416%
T32%67%72%67.1%±9.245% ▲

Optimal v Federico Coria: +0.4±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +11.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Federico Coria serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFederico winsv FranciscoMatchupOptimal
Wide34%61%72%59.9%±8.247% ▲
Body15%62%62%60.6%±12.215%
T51%60%70%54.2%±8.038% ▼

Optimal v Francisco Cerundolo: +0.4±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +3.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFederico winsv FranciscoMatchupOptimal
Wide57%65%68%59.6%±7.544% ▼
Body6%56%61%54.7%±14.26%
T37%69%67%64.4%±8.750% ▲

Optimal v Francisco Cerundolo: +0.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Francisco Cerundolo returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3+0.8−0.6+4.5±2.6
FH crosscourt25%+5.5+0.1+2.3+7.8±4.0
FH down the line15%+1.7−0.4+1.2+2.4±4.3
FH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.1−0.1−5.4±2.1
FH slice down the line4%−4.3−1.2±0.0−5.5±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.5±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (715 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4−0.8+0.9+6.4±2.3
BH crosscourt29%+8.8−1.2−0.3+7.3±3.1
BH down the line12%+4.2+3.1+1.7+9.0±4.4
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2−2.6+1.3−5.5±2.5
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−1.6+0.7−0.4±2.7

Lean BH down the line: +3.7±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (857 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.8−1.3−3.0±2.9
FH crosscourt35%−0.2+2.4+0.6+2.8±4.3
FH down the line18%−1.8−0.7−0.6−3.1±4.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.8±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (152 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
BH crosscourt38%+1.0−1.2+0.1±0.0±2.8
BH through the middle37%−2.9−1.0+0.6−3.3±2.3
BH down the line7%−0.2−3.7+0.8−3.1±4.3
FH through the middle7%−2.9+1.0−1.3−3.3±2.4
FH inside-out6%+1.0−1.1−0.6−0.7±3.7
FH inside-in4%+0.6−0.4+0.6+0.8±4.1

Lean FH inside-in: +2.5±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (564 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Federico Coria returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FranciscoValue
FH through the middle58%+4.3+3.0+1.8+9.0±2.6
FH down the line24%+1.7−1.0+4.2+4.9±4.0
FH crosscourt18%+5.5+2.1+3.0+10.6±3.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.3±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (114 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FranciscoValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+1.5+0.7+8.6±2.4
BH crosscourt36%+8.8−0.2+1.5+10.1±3.0
BH down the line12%+4.2+0.7+1.7+6.7±4.3
BH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.1−0.3−5.7±2.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.1±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (147 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FranciscoValue
FH through the middle60%−3.5−0.5+1.3−2.6±2.6
FH down the line28%−1.8−1.5−1.0−4.3±4.0
FH crosscourt12%−0.2−0.5+6.4+5.6±3.5

Lean FH through the middle: −0.5±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (43 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FranciscoValue
BH through the middle41%−2.9−0.3+0.2−3.0±2.3
BH crosscourt26%+1.0−0.5+0.2+0.7±2.8
FH through the middle16%−2.9+1.2+1.3−0.4±2.1
FH inside-out9%+1.0+0.6−1.0+0.6±3.2
BH down the line7%−0.2−0.6−2.4−3.2±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.0±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (140 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Francisco Cerundolo

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+5.7±4.8+2.7+2.9
BH to the middle · return+4.3±3.1+0.7+3.6
BH to the middle · return +1+1.8±3.4+1.3+0.5
BH to their backhand · return+1.4±3.3+0.1+1.4
FH to the middle · return+1.4±3.5+1.1+0.3
BH to their forehand · rally−0.4±4.7−1.6+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−7.1±4.6−4.4−2.8
FH to the middle · rally−4.0±3.0−1.2−2.8
BH to their backhand · rally−2.3±3.1−1.5−0.8
BH to the middle · rally−1.8±2.6−1.1−0.7
FH to their forehand · rally−1.8±4.0−0.7−1.1

Federico Coria

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return+5.8±3.4+3.3+2.5
FH to their backhand · return+4.9±4.3−1.1+6.0
BH to the middle · return+4.9±3.1+2.7+2.2
BH to their backhand · return+4.0±3.1+0.6+3.5
FH to the middle · serve +1+0.1±3.7−0.6+0.8
BH to the middle · rally+0.1±2.6−0.5+0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−7.7±5.6−3.9−3.9
FH to the middle · rally−7.5±2.9−5.9−1.6
FH to their backhand · rally−7.1±3.8−5.7−1.4
FH to their backhand · serve +1−5.5±4.5−5.2−0.3
FH to their forehand · rally−4.7±4.2−5.0+0.3

Against Federico Coria-like opponents

Francisco Cerundolo vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–59.3%38.2%
Players most similar to Federico Coria1 58.6%28.3%
Federico Coria (charted head-to-head)1 57.7%43.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Gael Monfils, Mariano Navone, Roberto Bautista Agut, Pedro Martinez, Nuno Borges, Daniel Elahi Galan, Mackenzie Mcdonald, Juan Pablo Varillas, Nikolay Davydenko, Juan Carlos Ferrero. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head