Game plan
Greg Rusedski v Learner Tien
Every number combines what Greg Rusedski does well with what Learner Tien allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective
Forecast
Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Greg Rusedski's record against Learner Tien's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +3.5 on serve, −1.6 on return vs expectation (178 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.
Head to head, per 100 shots
| Career | Greg | Learner |
|---|---|---|
| Direction choice | −0.26 ±0.08 better than 8% | +0.07 ±0.09 better than 74% |
| Shot selection | +0.04 ±0.27 better than 57% | −0.29 ±0.17 better than 24% |
| Execution | −1.20 ±0.80 better than 19% | +0.47 ±0.60 better than 83% |
| Points left on the table | 5.41 ±0.29 lower than 1% | 2.54 ±0.11 lower than 56% |
Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.
Serve plan
The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.
Greg Rusedski serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Greg wins | v Learner | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 52% | 74% | 69% | 69.9%±5.9 | 48% ▼ |
| Body | 8% | 69% | 55% | 61.0%±11.9 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 39% | 72% | 76% | 73.2%±5.9 | 52% ▲ |
Optimal v Learner Tien: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Greg wins | v Learner | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 51% | 79% | 74% | 79.6%±4.9 | 64% ▲ |
| Body | 9% | 69% | 58% | 64.3%±11.5 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 40% | 82% | 67% | 77.8%±6.0 | 36% ▼ |
Optimal v Learner Tien: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Learner Tien serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Learner wins | v Greg | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 44% | 69% | 78% | 74.4%±5.6 | 57% ▲ |
| Body | 9% | 65% | 72% | 73.3%±10.5 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 47% | 62% | 79% | 67.5%±6.7 | 43% ▼ |
Optimal v Greg Rusedski: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Learner wins | v Greg | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 51% | 70% | 83% | 80.4%±5.2 | 64% ▲ |
| Body | 9% | 71% | 61% | 68.7%±11.1 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 40% | 78% | 78% | 83.4%±4.8 | 36% ▼ |
Optimal v Greg Rusedski: +0.9±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Return plan
Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.
Greg Rusedski returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Learner | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 53% | +4.3 | −1.3 | −1.2 | +1.7±2.5 |
| FH down the line | 19% | +1.7 | −8.6 | +6.0 | −1.0±4.4 |
| FH crosscourt | 18% | +5.5 | −1.0 | −5.5 | −1.0±4.4 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 6% | −4.3 | −0.1 | −1.2 | −5.7±2.5 |
| FH slice through the middle | 4% | −4.2 | +1.6 | −1.4 | −3.9±2.2 |
Lean FH through the middle: +1.6±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (345 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Learner | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice through the middle | 42% | −4.2 | −0.7 | +0.9 | −4.1±2.2 |
| BH slice down the line | 18% | −8.4 | +0.8 | −1.1 | −8.7±3.4 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 17% | +0.5 | −0.1 | −0.7 | −0.3±2.9 |
| BH through the middle | 10% | +6.4 | −2.9 | +2.7 | +6.3±2.5 |
| BH down the line | 8% | +4.2 | −5.1 | +3.8 | +3.0±4.3 |
| BH crosscourt | 4% | +8.8 | −1.9 | +0.9 | +7.7±3.5 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +9.9±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (545 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Learner | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 38% | −3.5 | −2.8 | +0.3 | −6.0±2.8 |
| FH down the line | 26% | −1.8 | −4.4 | ±0.0 | −6.2±4.7 |
| FH crosscourt | 22% | −0.2 | −1.1 | −1.0 | −2.3±4.3 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 5% | −12.5 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | −12.4±1.5 |
| FH slice through the middle | 5% | −12.7 | +0.5 | −0.8 | −12.9±1.8 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +3.8±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (133 returns charted)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Learner | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice through the middle | 36% | −11.3 | +1.0 | +0.2 | −10.1±2.0 |
| BH slice down the line | 28% | −9.3 | +1.2 | ±0.0 | −8.1±3.4 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 15% | −4.0 | +0.4 | ±0.0 | −3.6±1.8 |
| BH through the middle | 8% | −2.9 | −0.2 | +1.5 | −1.6±2.3 |
| BH down the line | 6% | −0.2 | +2.8 | +1.3 | +3.9±4.5 |
Lean BH down the line: +10.3±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (348 returns charted)
Learner Tien returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Greg | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 30% | +4.3 | +0.8 | −0.7 | +4.4±2.7 |
| FH slice through the middle | 23% | −4.2 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | −4.1±2.1 |
| FH crosscourt | 17% | +5.5 | +2.9 | −2.8 | +5.5±4.4 |
| FH slice crosscourt | 16% | −4.3 | +2.4 | −1.1 | −3.0±2.4 |
| FH down the line | 8% | +1.7 | +0.1 | +0.4 | +2.1±4.3 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +5.1±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (420 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Greg | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 39% | +6.4 | −0.2 | ±0.0 | +6.1±2.4 |
| BH crosscourt | 25% | +8.8 | −0.9 | −4.7 | +3.2±3.4 |
| BH down the line | 16% | +4.2 | +2.1 | −1.9 | +4.4±4.5 |
| BH slice through the middle | 11% | −4.2 | −1.4 | −0.2 | −5.8±2.4 |
| BH slice down the line | 6% | −8.4 | +0.5 | +2.0 | −5.9±3.5 |
Lean BH through the middle: +3.3±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (497 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Greg | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 45% | −3.5 | −1.1 | −1.5 | −6.0±2.7 |
| FH crosscourt | 39% | −0.2 | +2.7 | −0.8 | +1.6±4.3 |
| FH down the line | 13% | −1.8 | +0.4 | +2.1 | +0.7±4.3 |
| FH slice through the middle | 4% | −12.7 | +0.5 | ±0.0 | −12.2±1.1 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +4.0±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (155 returns charted)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Greg | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 42% | −2.9 | +0.7 | −1.0 | −3.1±2.3 |
| BH crosscourt | 30% | +1.0 | +1.2 | +0.5 | +2.7±3.3 |
| BH down the line | 15% | −0.2 | −0.1 | −0.9 | −1.2±4.9 |
| FH through the middle | 7% | −2.9 | +1.2 | −1.5 | −3.2±2.1 |
| FH inside-in | 5% | +0.6 | ±0.0 | −0.8 | −0.3±3.9 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +3.5±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (257 returns charted)
Rally plan
Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.
Greg Rusedski
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH to their backhand · return | +3.9±4.9 | −1.4 | +5.2 |
| FH to their backhand · return +1 | +3.1±3.4 | +2.7 | +0.3 |
| BH slice to their forehand · rally | +2.4±3.4 | +1.4 | +1.0 |
| BH slice to the middle · rally | +1.9±2.2 | +2.6 | −0.7 |
| BH to their backhand · return +1 | +1.4±4.4 | +4.6 | −3.1 |
| FH to their backhand · rally | +1.3±2.5 | +0.5 | +0.8 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH to their forehand · return | −15.4±5.5 | −10.6 | −4.8 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | −5.7±3.1 | −3.8 | −1.9 |
| FH to the middle · return | −4.1±3.1 | −3.5 | −0.6 |
| BH slice to their backhand · rally | −3.2±2.3 | −1.4 | −1.8 |
| BH slice to the middle · return | −3.0±2.8 | −4.1 | +1.1 |
Learner Tien
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH to their forehand · return +1 | +5.4±5.5 | +2.6 | +2.7 |
| BH to their forehand · serve +1 | +4.9±4.4 | +2.0 | +3.0 |
| BH to their forehand · rally | +4.6±3.2 | +3.7 | +0.9 |
| FH to their backhand · return +1 | +4.6±3.7 | +1.4 | +3.2 |
| FH to their backhand · return | +3.1±4.6 | +2.1 | +1.0 |
| BH to their backhand · serve +1 | +2.2±3.3 | +0.2 | +1.9 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH to their forehand · return | −6.6±5.6 | −0.8 | −5.9 |
| FH to their forehand · serve +1 | −5.6±3.4 | −1.3 | −4.3 |
| FH to their backhand · serve +1 | −2.1±2.9 | −1.8 | −0.4 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | −2.1±3.0 | +0.8 | −2.8 |
| BH slice to the middle · return | −1.8±2.9 | −1.2 | −0.6 |
Against Learner Tien-like opponents
| Greg Rusedski v | Matches | Serve pts won | Return pts won |
|---|---|---|---|
| All charted opponents | – | 66.2% | 29.0% |
| Players most similar to Learner Tien | 1 | 63.8% | 31.0% |
Similar by tactical fingerprint: Hubert Hurkacz, Ugo Humbert, Novak Djokovic, Karen Khachanov, Laslo Djere, David Goffin, Dominic Thiem, Fernando Verdasco, Denis Istomin, Nikolay Davydenko. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.