RallyIQ

Game plan

Hubert Hurkacz v Joao Fonseca

Every number combines what Hubert Hurkacz does well with what Joao Fonseca allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Hubert Hurkacz wins, best of 3 49%90%: 28%–71% · best of 5: 49%
Serve points won 67.2% / 67.3% Hubert / Joao · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 48%serve 67.5% / 67.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Hubert Hurkacz's record against Joao Fonseca's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.8 on serve, +2.1 on return vs expectation (2712 points); head-to-head: −12.9 on serve, −8.4 on return vs expectation (149 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerHubertJoao
Direction choice+0.09 ±0.02
better than 79%
+0.02 ±0.07
better than 62%
Shot selection+0.14 ±0.05
better than 68%
−0.24 ±0.14
better than 28%
Execution−0.38 ±0.15
better than 49%
+0.83 ±0.60
better than 93%
Points left on the table2.49 ±0.04
lower than 62%
2.55 ±0.09
lower than 55%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Hubert Hurkacz −1.08, Joao Fonseca −0.34. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Hubert Hurkacz serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowHubert winsv JoaoMatchupOptimal
Wide47%78%69%74.7%±2.960% ▲
Body5%63%60%59.8%±7.30% ▼
T48%80%73%78.2%±2.740% ▼

Optimal v Joao Fonseca: +0.5±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowHubert winsv JoaoMatchupOptimal
Wide53%78%72%77.5%±2.766% ▲
Body4%66%62%65.1%±7.10% ▼
T42%76%74%77.8%±3.134% ▼

Optimal v Joao Fonseca: +0.2±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Joao Fonseca serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJoao winsv HubertMatchupOptimal
Wide43%76%73%76.4%±2.939% ▼
Body9%65%63%64.5%±6.50% ▼
T48%76%77%78.0%±2.861% ▲

Optimal v Hubert Hurkacz: +0.7±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJoao winsv HubertMatchupOptimal
Wide52%69%73%69.0%±3.250% ▼
Body10%61%64%62.9%±6.60% ▼
T37%70%73%71.4%±3.550% ▲

Optimal v Hubert Hurkacz: +0.7±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Hubert Hurkacz returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3−0.4+2.3+6.1±1.6
FH crosscourt24%+5.5−2.3+3.2+6.4±2.8
FH down the line21%+1.7−2.0+3.3+3.0±2.9
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−2.1+0.5−5.8±1.9
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3−4.4+0.8−7.9±2.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.4±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (6555 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
BH through the middle34%+6.4−0.2+2.3+8.5±1.4
BH crosscourt26%+8.8−0.1+3.3+11.9±2.0
BH slice through the middle14%−4.2−3.5+0.2−7.4±1.9
BH down the line10%+4.2−0.9+4.0+7.3±3.4
BH slice crosscourt10%+0.5−6.1+0.7−4.9±2.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.9±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (6287 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+1.4−2.1−4.2±1.8
FH down the line26%−1.8−1.5+0.1−3.2±3.5
FH crosscourt26%−0.2−3.3−1.3−4.9±3.4
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−3.7−0.4−16.7±2.2
FH slice crosscourt1%−12.5−3.9+0.3−16.0±2.4

Lean FH down the line: +1.3±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (1676 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
BH crosscourt42%+1.0−1.1+0.6+0.6±1.9
BH through the middle37%−2.9±0.0−0.3−3.2±1.5
BH down the line14%−0.2+0.5−0.5−0.3±3.9
FH through the middle2%−2.9−1.7−2.1−6.6±2.1
BH slice through the middle1%−11.3−1.4±0.0−12.7±1.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.0±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (3803 returns charted)

Joao Fonseca returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HubertValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3+1.9−2.1+4.1±1.6
FH crosscourt17%+5.5+3.7−6.6+2.5±3.1
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2−1.3−2.8−8.3±1.6
FH down the line14%+1.7+6.9−6.7+1.8±3.2
FH slice down the line5%−4.3+2.6−7.6−9.3±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +4.0±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (792 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HubertValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+2.6−1.0+8.0±1.5
BH crosscourt24%+8.8+3.2−2.7+9.2±2.2
BH down the line13%+4.2+6.3−5.6+4.9±3.4
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2−1.2−4.9−10.3±1.8
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5+1.2−6.9−5.2±2.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.3±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (891 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HubertValue
FH through the middle37%−3.5−0.7−1.0−5.2±2.1
FH crosscourt36%−0.2−0.7−2.9−3.9±3.5
FH down the line18%−1.8+1.9−4.1−4.0±3.8
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7−0.1−3.7−16.5±2.0
FH slice down the line3%−9.4+0.3−0.6−9.7±2.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.1±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (233 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HubertValue
BH through the middle38%−2.9−0.6−0.7−4.2±1.5
BH crosscourt33%+1.0−1.2−1.8−2.0±2.0
BH down the line14%−0.2+0.7−5.0−4.5±3.8
FH through the middle7%−2.9−1.2−1.0−5.1±1.9
FH inside-in5%+0.6+0.5−2.9−1.9±3.5

Lean FH inside-in: +1.8±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (627 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Hubert Hurkacz

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return+2.2±1.5−0.6+2.8
BH to the middle · return+2.0±1.1±0.0+2.0
BH to their forehand · return+2.0±2.8−0.9+2.9
BH to the middle · return +1+1.4±1.6+0.7+0.6
FH to the middle · return +1+0.9±1.8−0.1+1.1
FH slice to the middle · return +1+0.8±2.3+2.5−1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · rally−7.9±2.7−3.5−4.4
BH volley to their forehand · rally−7.0±4.9−6.3−0.6
BH volley to their backhand · rally−6.7±4.6−3.2−3.5
BH slice to their backhand · return−4.7±2.4−5.7+0.9
BH slice to the middle · return +1−4.6±2.0+0.4−5.0

Joao Fonseca

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally+3.0±2.0+1.9+1.1
FH volley to their forehand · rally+2.0±4.7+4.1−2.1
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.0±1.7+1.3+0.7
BH to their forehand · serve +1+2.0±3.0+2.5−0.5
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.0±1.9+0.7+1.3
FH to the middle · serve +1+1.8±1.6+0.6+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · return−5.2±1.8−0.7−4.5
BH slice to their backhand · return−4.6±2.3+1.8−6.4
FH volley to their backhand · rally−4.6±4.7−2.6−2.0
FH to their forehand · return−4.3±2.5+0.8−5.1
FH slice to the middle · return−4.3±1.6−1.3−3.0

Against Joao Fonseca-like opponents

Hubert Hurkacz vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.3%34.4%
Players most similar to Joao Fonseca16 69.5%36.2%
Joao Fonseca (charted head-to-head)1 54.4%23.9%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Fabian Marozsan, Sebastian Korda, Alexei Popyrin, Laslo Djere, Kei Nishikori, Dominic Thiem, Fernando Verdasco, Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Philipp Kohlschreiber. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head