RallyIQ

Game plan

Jaume Munar v Joao Fonseca

Every number combines what Jaume Munar does well with what Joao Fonseca allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Jaume Munar wins, best of 3 37%90%: 9%–74% · best of 5: 33%
Serve points won 62.0% / 64.8% Jaume / Joao · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 39%serve 62.5% / 64.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Jaume Munar's record against Joao Fonseca's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −6.2 on serve, +3.9 on return vs expectation (331 points); head-to-head: +4.0 on serve, −8.3 on return vs expectation (155 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerJaumeJoao
Direction choice−0.01 ±0.08
better than 53%
+0.02 ±0.07
better than 62%
Shot selection−0.31 ±0.21
better than 22%
−0.24 ±0.14
better than 28%
Execution+0.60 ±0.36
better than 86%
+0.83 ±0.60
better than 93%
Points left on the table2.55 ±0.11
lower than 55%
2.55 ±0.09
lower than 55%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Jaume Munar +0.50, Joao Fonseca +0.69. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Jaume Munar serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJaume winsv JoaoMatchupOptimal
Wide55%68%69%63.6%±4.567% ▲
Body10%65%60%62.1%±9.30% ▼
T35%73%73%71.1%±5.133% ▼

Optimal v Joao Fonseca: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJaume winsv JoaoMatchupOptimal
Wide51%68%72%66.5%±4.851%
Body14%64%62%63.4%±8.81% ▼
T35%66%74%68.6%±5.248% ▲

Optimal v Joao Fonseca: +0.2±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Joao Fonseca serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJoao winsv JaumeMatchupOptimal
Wide43%76%72%75.3%±4.156% ▲
Body9%65%54%55.7%±9.40% ▼
T48%76%71%72.3%±4.644% ▼

Optimal v Jaume Munar: +1.0±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJoao winsv JaumeMatchupOptimal
Wide52%69%70%65.3%±4.650% ▼
Body10%61%63%61.8%±9.60% ▼
T37%70%69%67.2%±5.450% ▲

Optimal v Jaume Munar: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Jaume Munar returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3−0.4+2.3+6.1±2.1
FH slice through the middle22%−4.2+0.7+0.5−3.0±2.1
FH down the line13%+1.7−0.2+3.3+4.7±4.1
FH crosscourt11%+5.5+2.3+3.2+10.9±4.0
FH slice down the line7%−4.3+1.8+2.9+0.5±3.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.2±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (701 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4+2.3+2.3+11.0±1.9
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+1.2+3.3+13.2±2.7
BH slice through the middle13%−4.2−0.1+0.2−4.0±2.4
BH down the line10%+4.2+1.9+4.0+10.2±4.4
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−1.6+0.7−0.4±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.7±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (760 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+2.5−2.1−3.0±2.5
FH crosscourt25%−0.2+0.4−1.3−1.2±4.2
FH down the line21%−1.8+0.8+0.1−0.9±4.4
FH slice through the middle6%−12.7+0.8−0.4−12.3±1.9
FH slice down the line4%−9.4+0.6+1.2−7.6±2.2

Lean FH down the line: +2.0±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (170 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9−0.7−0.3−3.9±1.9
BH crosscourt29%+1.0+1.3+0.6+2.9±2.7
BH down the line13%−0.2+2.2−0.5+1.4±4.9
FH through the middle6%−2.9−1.1−2.1−6.1±2.1
FH inside-in3%+0.6−0.1−1.3−0.9±3.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (456 returns charted)

Joao Fonseca returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JaumeValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3+1.9+1.2+7.4±2.0
FH crosscourt17%+5.5+3.7+2.3+11.5±3.8
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2−1.3−0.5−6.1±2.2
FH down the line14%+1.7+6.9+0.3+8.8±4.0
FH slice down the line5%−4.3+2.6+1.2−0.5±3.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.4±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (792 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JaumeValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+2.6−0.8+8.2±1.9
BH crosscourt24%+8.8+3.2+0.3+12.3±2.8
BH down the line13%+4.2+6.3+1.6+12.0±4.3
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2−1.2−1.1−6.5±2.4
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5+1.2−1.9−0.2±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.5±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (891 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JaumeValue
FH through the middle37%−3.5−0.7+1.1−3.1±2.5
FH crosscourt36%−0.2−0.7+0.3−0.7±4.0
FH down the line18%−1.8+1.9−0.2−0.1±4.4
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7−0.1±0.0−12.8±1.2
FH slice down the line3%−9.4+0.3±0.0−9.1±1.4

Lean FH down the line: +2.1±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (233 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JaumeValue
BH through the middle38%−2.9−0.6−1.6−5.2±2.1
BH crosscourt33%+1.0−1.2−1.1−1.3±2.7
BH down the line14%−0.2+0.7+3.3+3.7±4.9
FH through the middle7%−2.9−1.2+1.1−3.0±2.1
FH inside-in5%+0.6+0.5+0.3+1.3±4.0

Lean BH down the line: +5.9±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (627 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Jaume Munar

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+7.3±5.6+2.4+4.9
BH to their forehand · return+5.9±4.8+1.8+4.1
FH slice to their backhand · return+5.5±3.8+0.5+5.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1+5.4±4.9+5.2+0.2
BH to their backhand · return+4.6±4.5+1.4+3.1
BH to the middle · return +1+3.7±2.0+3.1+0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−6.7±4.5−2.7−4.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1−6.6±4.6−3.6−3.0
BH slice to the middle · return +1−6.4±2.8+0.7−7.2
FH slice to the middle · rally−4.3±2.7−0.7−3.6
BH to their forehand · serve +1−4.2±5.2+0.9−5.1

Joao Fonseca

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally+6.3±5.7+4.1+2.2
FH to the middle · return+5.8±3.5+5.0+0.8
BH to their forehand · return+5.8±5.1+2.5+3.3
FH to their backhand · return+5.4±5.3+5.1+0.3
BH to their forehand · serve +1+4.6±5.3+3.4+1.2
FH to the middle · serve +1+4.2±2.9+3.4+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · rally−3.8±3.5−2.9−1.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1−3.6±4.6−0.6−3.0
BH to the middle · serve +1−3.3±3.4−0.8−2.5
BH slice to the middle · rally−2.7±2.7−2.4−0.3
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−2.3±3.3±0.0−2.3

Against Joao Fonseca-like opponents

Jaume Munar vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–60.1%37.4%
Players most similar to Joao Fonseca2 57.4%38.7%
Joao Fonseca (charted head-to-head)1 65.0%26.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Hubert Hurkacz, Fabian Marozsan, Sebastian Korda, Alexei Popyrin, Laslo Djere, Kei Nishikori, Dominic Thiem, Fernando Verdasco, Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Philipp Kohlschreiber. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head