RallyIQ

Game plan

Karue Sell v Frances Tiafoe

Every number combines what Karue Sell does well with what Frances Tiafoe allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Karue Sell wins, best of 3 47%90%: 18%–78% · best of 5: 47%
Serve points won 62.0% / 62.6% Karue / Frances · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 47%serve 62.0% / 62.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Karue Sell's record against Frances Tiafoe's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerKarueFrances
Direction choice+0.13 ±0.07
better than 87%
+0.06 ±0.06
better than 72%
Shot selection+0.64 ±0.22
better than 97%
+0.14 ±0.09
better than 69%
Execution−1.33 ±0.41
better than 15%
−0.26 ±0.34
better than 54%
Points left on the table2.20 ±0.12
lower than 93%
2.38 ±0.11
lower than 75%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Karue Sell serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKarue winsv FrancesMatchupOptimal
Wide58%69%75%70.5%±7.155% ▼
Body10%62%65%64.3%±12.80% ▼
T32%79%76%80.2%±7.945% ▲

Optimal v Frances Tiafoe: +0.9±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +7.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKarue winsv FrancesMatchupOptimal
Wide43%74%78%78.4%±7.344%
Body16%63%67%66.8%±11.43% ▼
T40%68%76%72.3%±8.653% ▲

Optimal v Frances Tiafoe: +0.3±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Frances Tiafoe serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFrances winsv KarueMatchupOptimal
Wide50%72%72%70.9%±7.645% ▼
Body8%63%56%56.6%±11.70% ▼
T42%79%77%80.6%±7.655% ▲

Optimal v Karue Sell: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFrances winsv KarueMatchupOptimal
Wide40%76%65%68.9%±8.953% ▲
Body10%60%65%62.3%±13.00% ▼
T51%70%62%59.1%±8.947% ▼

Optimal v Karue Sell: +0.4±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Karue Sell returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FrancesValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3−0.5+2.3+6.1±2.5
FH down the line26%+1.7−0.8−1.7−0.7±4.1
FH crosscourt22%+5.5+0.9−0.9+5.5±4.0

Lean FH through the middle: +1.9±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (120 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FrancesValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4−2.0−0.3+4.1±2.5
BH crosscourt31%+8.8−0.1−3.0+5.8±3.4
BH down the line14%+4.2−0.2−4.2−0.1±4.1
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.4−2.1−6.6±2.0
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−1.7−0.2−1.3±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.9±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (86 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FrancesValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9−1.0+1.9−2.0±2.1
BH crosscourt35%+1.0−0.8+0.8+1.1±2.7
BH down the line18%−0.2−2.1−1.3−3.7±4.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.3±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (68 returns charted)

Frances Tiafoe returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarueValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3−0.1−0.3+3.9±2.6
FH crosscourt21%+5.5−1.6−0.6+3.3±4.0
FH down the line19%+1.7−1.6+0.2+0.2±4.1
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2−0.1−1.5−5.8±2.1
FH slice down the line3%−4.3+0.7±0.0−3.5±2.1

Lean FH through the middle: +2.4±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (816 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarueValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4−0.1+0.8+7.1±2.5
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+1.2−0.6+9.4±3.2
BH down the line10%+4.2−1.0−1.6+1.6±4.4
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.9−0.5−5.6±2.1
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5−2.9±0.0−2.4±2.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.8±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (714 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarueValue
FH through the middle50%−3.5−1.6−0.9−6.0±2.8
FH crosscourt25%−0.2−1.3−1.9−3.4±4.1
FH down the line23%−1.8−1.4−1.1−4.3±4.5
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7+0.3±0.0−12.4±1.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.7±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (225 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarueValue
BH crosscourt49%+1.0+1.6−0.2+2.4±2.9
BH through the middle38%−2.9−1.2−0.4−4.5±2.4
BH down the line12%−0.2+1.6+0.2+1.6±4.4
BH slice through the middle1%−11.3−0.2±0.0−11.5±1.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.9±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (471 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Karue Sell

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1+6.2±5.3+2.8+3.4
FH to the middle · return+3.9±3.2+1.3+2.6
BH to their backhand · return +1+2.9±4.2+1.2+1.7
FH to the middle · rally+2.3±2.9+2.2+0.1
FH to their backhand · rally+2.1±3.7+1.3+0.8
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.7±4.9−1.0+2.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return−2.4±3.9−0.3−2.1
BH to the middle · return−1.6±3.0−1.9+0.2
FH to their forehand · return−1.0±5.7−0.1−1.0
BH to their backhand · serve +1−0.2±4.0+0.7−0.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1+0.3±4.4−3.2+3.5

Frances Tiafoe

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.1±4.0+0.1+2.9
BH to their backhand · rally+2.2±2.9+1.1+1.1
FH to their backhand · rally+1.1±3.8−0.7+1.8
BH to the middle · rally+0.8±2.6+0.3+0.5
BH to their backhand · return+0.3±3.9+0.8−0.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally+0.2±2.4−0.3+0.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−3.0±5.2−1.0−2.0
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.9±5.4−0.8−2.1
FH to their forehand · rally−1.9±3.5−2.0+0.1
FH to the middle · return−1.6±3.2−0.2−1.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1−1.3±4.8+0.9−2.3

Against Frances Tiafoe-like opponents

Karue Sell vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.1%42.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Alexander Shevchenko, Alexandre Muller, Roman Safiullin, Fabio Fognini, Matteo Arnaldi, Otto Virtanen, Lucas Pouille, Gregoire Barrere, Marcos Baghdatis, Tomas Berdych. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.