RallyIQ

Game plan

Leonardo Mayer v Alexei Popyrin

Every number combines what Leonardo Mayer does well with what Alexei Popyrin allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Leonardo Mayer wins, best of 3 56%90%: 25%–83% · best of 5: 57%
Serve points won 71.9% / 70.7% Leonardo / Alexei · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 55%serve 71.5% / 70.3%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Leonardo Mayer's record against Alexei Popyrin's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +5.7 on serve, −4.6 on return vs expectation (251 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerLeonardoAlexei
Direction choice+0.08 ±0.10
better than 78%
+0.04 ±0.06
better than 69%
Shot selection+0.64 ±0.21
better than 97%
+0.29 ±0.15
better than 79%
Execution−1.77 ±0.69
better than 6%
−0.73 ±0.59
better than 36%
Points left on the table2.47 ±0.19
lower than 66%
2.71 ±0.10
lower than 39%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Leonardo Mayer serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowLeonardo winsv AlexeiMatchupOptimal
Wide52%74%73%73.8%±5.565% ▲
Body9%57%64%56.8%±11.90% ▼
T40%73%75%73.1%±6.435% ▼

Optimal v Alexei Popyrin: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowLeonardo winsv AlexeiMatchupOptimal
Wide49%67%74%68.6%±6.446% ▼
Body10%60%69%65.7%±11.70% ▼
T41%69%73%70.3%±6.854% ▲

Optimal v Alexei Popyrin: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Alexei Popyrin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlexei winsv LeonardoMatchupOptimal
Wide45%73%77%77.3%±5.743% ▼
Body9%62%65%63.8%±10.60% ▼
T45%78%74%77.7%±5.357% ▲

Optimal v Leonardo Mayer: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlexei winsv LeonardoMatchupOptimal
Wide52%76%80%82.4%±4.665% ▲
Body5%63%65%64.4%±12.30% ▼
T43%74%76%77.8%±6.135% ▼

Optimal v Leonardo Mayer: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Leonardo Mayer returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexeiValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−1.1+1.7+4.8±2.6
FH down the line26%+1.7−2.3−4.4−4.9±4.4
FH crosscourt14%+5.5−0.8+1.7+6.4±4.2
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2+0.3+0.3−3.7±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.9±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (208 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexeiValue
BH through the middle31%+6.4−2.0+0.5+4.9±2.4
BH crosscourt24%+8.8+0.2−0.9+8.0±3.3
BH slice through the middle19%−4.2+1.4−2.0−4.8±2.4
BH down the line13%+4.2+0.9+1.0+6.1±4.6
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5+0.9−3.4−1.9±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.5±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (336 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexeiValue
FH through the middle39%−3.5+1.3+0.3−1.8±2.5
FH crosscourt33%−0.2−1.0+1.5+0.3±4.1
FH down the line28%−1.8−1.5−3.4−6.8±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (54 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexeiValue
BH through the middle34%−2.9−2.2−0.4−5.6±2.3
BH crosscourt32%+1.0−1.5−2.2−2.7±2.9
FH through the middle10%−2.9−1.8+0.3−4.4±2.1
FH inside-in8%+0.6−0.8+1.5+1.3±3.9
FH inside-out8%+1.0−0.5−3.4−3.0±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +0.2±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (156 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Alexei Popyrin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LeonardoValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3+1.5−1.2+4.6±2.5
FH down the line21%+1.7+1.8−1.1+2.5±4.2
FH crosscourt19%+5.5+3.3+2.4+11.2±4.3
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−1.3−0.5−6.0±2.3
FH slice down the line4%−4.3−0.6+0.5−4.3±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.4±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (584 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LeonardoValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+1.0−1.5+5.9±2.4
BH down the line20%+4.2−1.4−1.0+1.8±4.3
BH slice through the middle15%−4.2+0.8+1.9−1.6±2.4
BH crosscourt13%+8.8+1.6−0.7+9.7±3.5
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5−3.0±0.0−2.5±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.3±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (633 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LeonardoValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5−0.9−1.9−6.3±2.9
FH crosscourt32%−0.2+5.2−1.9+3.0±4.4
FH down the line21%−1.8−4.1−1.4−7.3±4.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.5±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (139 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LeonardoValue
BH through the middle37%−2.9−4.1−0.2−7.2±2.3
BH down the line21%−0.2−1.5+0.9−0.8±4.7
BH crosscourt18%+1.0−3.2−0.2−2.4±3.2
FH through the middle10%−2.9−2.4−1.9−7.2±2.4
FH inside-out9%+1.0−1.3−1.4−1.7±3.7

Lean BH down the line: +3.6±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (463 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Leonardo Mayer

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1+6.1±4.3−0.3+6.4
BH to their forehand · return+3.6±4.5+0.8+2.8
FH to their forehand · return+3.2±5.3−1.5+4.6
FH to the middle · return +1+2.8±3.2−0.1+3.0
FH to their backhand · rally+1.7±4.6+2.4−0.7
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.2±4.8+0.2+1.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−9.5±5.7−5.3−4.2
FH to their forehand · rally−4.7±4.8−4.7±0.0
BH to their backhand · return−4.1±4.0+1.7−5.8
FH to their forehand · return +1−3.9±5.9−2.1−1.8
BH to their forehand · return +1−2.9±6.2−3.5+0.6

Alexei Popyrin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+5.8±5.1+1.4+4.4
FH to their forehand · return+3.2±5.4+3.0+0.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1+2.7±4.7−0.9+3.6
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.1±3.4+0.3+1.8
BH slice to their backhand · rally+1.8±3.0+1.3+0.4
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.3±3.8−0.5+1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−5.8±5.3−1.6−4.2
BH to their backhand · rally−4.4±3.7−4.8+0.4
BH to their backhand · return−4.3±4.7−2.2−2.0
FH to their backhand · rally−3.7±4.6−3.2−0.5
FH to the middle · return−3.4±3.7−2.0−1.3

Against Alexei Popyrin-like opponents

Leonardo Mayer vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.8%30.6%
Players most similar to Alexei Popyrin1 70.0%26.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Joao Fonseca, Hubert Hurkacz, Tallon Griekspoor, Zizou Bergs, Thanasi Kokkinakis, Dominic Thiem, Lucas Pouille, Lloyd Harris, Jo Wilfried Tsonga. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.