RallyIQ

Game plan

Marin Cilic v Pedro Martinez

Every number combines what Marin Cilic does well with what Pedro Martinez allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Marin Cilic wins, best of 3 78%90%: 56%–92% · best of 5: 83%
Serve points won 67.5% / 61.2% Marin / Pedro · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 80%serve 67.2% / 60.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Marin Cilic's record against Pedro Martinez's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.1 on serve, −2.4 on return vs expectation (1824 points); head-to-head: +8.4 on serve, +7.9 on return vs expectation (83 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMarinPedro
Direction choice+0.14 ±0.05
better than 87%
−0.06 ±0.08
better than 43%
Shot selection+0.28 ±0.08
better than 78%
−0.06 ±0.23
better than 46%
Execution−1.01 ±0.32
better than 25%
+0.23 ±0.43
better than 77%
Points left on the table2.18 ±0.08
lower than 93%
2.66 ±0.12
lower than 43%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Marin Cilic −0.28, Pedro Martinez +1.43. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Marin Cilic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMarin winsv PedroMatchupOptimal
Wide50%73%75%75.0%±4.141% ▼
Body4%58%70%65.1%±9.80% ▼
T46%80%76%81.3%±3.659% ▲

Optimal v Pedro Martinez: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMarin winsv PedroMatchupOptimal
Wide53%76%71%74.4%±4.447% ▼
Body7%63%56%56.2%±9.70% ▼
T40%76%73%76.8%±4.553% ▲

Optimal v Pedro Martinez: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Pedro Martinez serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPedro winsv MarinMatchupOptimal
Wide41%65%74%66.2%±4.754% ▲
Body11%59%67%63.5%±7.90% ▼
T48%68%74%66.6%±4.646% ▼

Optimal v Marin Cilic: +0.2±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPedro winsv MarinMatchupOptimal
Wide54%63%76%66.9%±4.567% ▲
Body16%59%59%55.3%±8.03% ▼
T30%62%71%61.5%±5.830%

Optimal v Marin Cilic: +0.8±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Marin Cilic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
FH through the middle54%+4.3−0.2+1.7+5.8±1.8
FH crosscourt24%+5.5−1.8+6.1+9.8±3.5
FH down the line21%+1.7−1.0+1.6+2.3±3.7
FH slice through the middle1%−4.2+1.3+1.7−1.2±2.2
FH slice crosscourt0%−4.3+0.1+0.1−4.1±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.0±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (1630 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4±0.0+1.6+8.0±1.6
BH crosscourt31%+8.8−4.3+1.7+6.2±2.3
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−4.5−1.4−10.1±2.3
BH down the line8%+4.2+4.7+4.4+13.3±4.4
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−4.3−2.2−6.0±2.8

Lean BH down the line: +8.5±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1619 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
FH through the middle51%−3.5±0.0+1.2−2.2±2.4
FH down the line26%−1.8+1.0−1.7−2.4±4.5
FH crosscourt23%−0.2−1.1−1.6−2.9±4.2

Lean FH through the middle: +0.2±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (484 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
BH crosscourt48%+1.0−2.7+1.2−0.5±2.5
BH through the middle40%−2.9+0.3+1.0−1.6±2.0
BH down the line6%−0.2+0.5−0.8−0.5±5.0
FH inside-in2%+0.6+1.2−1.6+0.2±4.1
FH inside-out2%+1.0+0.7−1.7±0.0±3.5

Lean FH inside-in: +1.2±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (924 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Pedro Martinez returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3+2.1−1.4+5.0±2.1
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+1.1−1.4+5.3±3.8
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2+1.7+0.9−1.6±2.1
FH down the line12%+1.7+1.9−1.6+2.0±3.9
FH slice crosscourt8%−4.3+0.6+0.5−3.2±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.3±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (426 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+2.2−0.5+8.1±2.0
BH crosscourt27%+8.8−3.4+1.5+6.9±2.9
BH down the line13%+4.2−0.4+0.1+3.9±4.3
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2−1.5±0.0−5.7±2.1
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−1.5+1.2+0.2±2.6

Lean BH through the middle: +3.5±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (517 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5+1.2+0.8−1.4±2.5
FH crosscourt37%−0.2−0.4−1.5−2.2±4.1
FH down the line10%−1.8+0.6+1.0−0.1±3.7

Lean FH through the middle: +0.2±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (107 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
BH through the middle41%−2.9−0.2−0.6−3.7±1.8
BH crosscourt30%+1.0±0.0+0.2+1.2±2.5
BH down the line14%−0.2+5.2+1.2+6.2±4.4
FH inside-out7%+1.0−0.7+1.0+1.3±3.2
FH through the middle5%−2.9−0.7+0.8−2.8±1.9

Lean BH down the line: +6.6±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (340 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Marin Cilic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+6.8±4.3−0.8+7.5
BH to their forehand · serve +1+5.9±4.1+1.0+4.8
BH to the middle · return+3.6±1.3+0.3+3.3
BH to their forehand · return+3.6±3.8+0.8+2.7
FH to their forehand · return+3.0±3.2−0.4+3.4
FH to the middle · return+2.2±1.5+0.3+2.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · rally−5.6±2.9−2.3−3.3
BH to their backhand · serve +1−4.7±2.4−3.2−1.5
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−4.0±2.5−2.4−1.6
BH to the middle · serve +1−3.9±2.1−4.1+0.1
BH slice to the middle · rally−2.5±2.1−1.3−1.2

Pedro Martinez

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally+5.0±6.1−0.4+5.4
BH to their forehand · serve +1+3.9±3.9+3.3+0.6
FH to the middle · rally+3.8±1.4+3.5+0.2
BH to their forehand · rally+3.7±2.7+3.9−0.2
FH to their forehand · return +1+3.7±3.2+1.9+1.7
FH slice to their backhand · rally+3.6±3.7+0.8+2.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−1.6±3.5±0.0−1.6
BH slice to their forehand · rally−0.9±2.9−0.6−0.2
FH slice to the middle · rally−0.8±2.7−0.1−0.7
BH slice to the middle · rally−0.7±1.7−0.4−0.3
BH to their backhand · return−0.6±2.0−0.1−0.6

Against Pedro Martinez-like opponents

Marin Cilic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.5%34.3%
Players most similar to Pedro Martinez12 61.6%30.4%
Pedro Martinez (charted head-to-head)1 75.6%47.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Lorenzo Musetti, Novak Djokovic, Marton Fucsovics, Roberto Bautista Agut, Nuno Borges, Robin Haase, Pablo Andujar, Filip Krajinovic, Philipp Kohlschreiber, Gaston Gaudio. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head