RallyIQ

Game plan

Martin Klizan v Joao Fonseca

Every number combines what Martin Klizan does well with what Joao Fonseca allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Martin Klizan wins, best of 3 23%90%: 6%–52% · best of 5: 17%
Serve points won 62.7% / 68.9% Martin / Joao · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 26%serve 63.3% / 68.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Martin Klizan's record against Joao Fonseca's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −12.2 on serve, −13.2 on return vs expectation (115 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMartinJoao
Direction choice+0.06 ±0.10
better than 71%
+0.02 ±0.07
better than 62%
Shot selection+0.45 ±0.19
better than 90%
−0.24 ±0.14
better than 28%
Execution−1.20 ±0.94
better than 19%
+0.83 ±0.60
better than 93%
Points left on the table2.82 ±0.22
lower than 30%
2.55 ±0.09
lower than 55%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Martin Klizan serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMartin winsv JoaoMatchupOptimal
Wide38%76%69%72.3%±7.251% ▲
Body14%59%60%55.2%±11.41% ▼
T49%68%73%66.0%±6.748%

Optimal v Joao Fonseca: +1.1±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +5.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMartin winsv JoaoMatchupOptimal
Wide45%72%72%70.7%±6.941% ▼
Body9%64%62%63.0%±12.00% ▼
T46%79%74%81.1%±6.059% ▲

Optimal v Joao Fonseca: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Joao Fonseca serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJoao winsv MartinMatchupOptimal
Wide43%76%69%72.3%±6.256% ▲
Body9%65%64%65.5%±13.30% ▼
T48%76%70%71.2%±6.744% ▼

Optimal v Martin Klizan: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJoao winsv MartinMatchupOptimal
Wide52%69%74%69.6%±7.250% ▼
Body10%61%59%57.7%±13.40% ▼
T37%70%71%69.2%±7.050% ▲

Optimal v Martin Klizan: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Martin Klizan returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3+0.6+2.3+7.2±2.6
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+0.8+3.3+9.6±4.0
FH down the line20%+1.7+1.3+3.2+6.2±4.1
FH slice through the middle8%−4.2−1.6+0.5−5.3±2.0
FH slice crosscourt4%−4.3+0.7+2.9−0.7±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.3±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (140 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4±0.0+2.3+8.7±2.3
BH crosscourt22%+8.8+0.1+4.0+12.9±3.4
BH down the line21%+4.2−0.8+3.3+6.6±4.0
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2+0.4+0.2−3.6±2.3
BH slice down the line5%−8.4+2.3+0.7−5.4±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.5±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (214 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5−0.4−2.1−5.9±2.5
FH crosscourt35%−0.2+1.0+0.1+0.9±4.0
FH down the line21%−1.8+4.8−1.3+1.7±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (62 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoaoValue
BH crosscourt34%+1.0−0.9−0.5−0.4±3.2
BH through the middle30%−2.9+0.7−0.3−2.5±2.2
FH through the middle16%−2.9−1.1−2.1−6.1±2.1
BH down the line11%−0.2−2.1+0.6−1.6±4.1
FH inside-in8%+0.6−0.9+0.1−0.3±3.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.7±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (166 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Joao Fonseca returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MartinValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3+1.9−0.7+5.5±2.6
FH crosscourt17%+5.5+3.7−1.2+8.0±4.2
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2−1.3−1.0−6.6±2.1
FH down the line14%+1.7+6.9−3.1+5.4±3.9
FH slice down the line5%−4.3+2.6±0.0−1.7±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.9±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (792 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MartinValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+2.6+2.8+11.8±2.3
BH crosscourt24%+8.8+3.2−0.7+11.2±3.3
BH down the line13%+4.2+6.3−4.8+5.6±4.5
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2−1.2−0.2−5.5±2.4
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5+1.2+1.2+2.9±2.7

Lean BH through the middle: +4.3±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (891 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MartinValue
FH through the middle37%−3.5−0.7+0.9−3.3±2.9
FH crosscourt36%−0.2−0.7+2.1+1.2±4.3
FH down the line18%−1.8+1.9+0.1+0.2±4.2
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7−0.1±0.0−12.8±1.2
FH slice down the line3%−9.4+0.3±0.0−9.1±1.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.6±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (233 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MartinValue
BH through the middle38%−2.9−0.6+0.7−2.8±2.2
BH crosscourt33%+1.0−1.2−0.2−0.4±3.0
BH down the line14%−0.2+0.7+0.5+1.0±4.8
FH through the middle7%−2.9−1.2+0.9−3.2±2.4
FH inside-in5%+0.6+0.5+2.1+3.2±4.3

Lean FH inside-in: +4.5±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (627 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Martin Klizan

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+6.3±2.9+1.6+4.7
BH to their forehand · return+4.7±5.0+0.6+4.1
BH to their forehand · return +1+4.6±5.7−0.2+4.9
FH to their backhand · return+2.1±4.8+0.4+1.6
BH to their forehand · rally+1.3±4.6−0.2+1.5
BH to their backhand · return+0.9±4.1−2.3+3.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−7.3±5.3−2.3−5.1
FH to their forehand · rally−5.7±4.1−1.7−4.0
FH to their backhand · rally−5.2±3.7−1.6−3.7
FH to their backhand · serve +1−3.5±4.2−0.5−3.0
FH to their backhand · return +1−1.8±4.7−1.7−0.1

Joao Fonseca

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+6.4±2.8+4.0+2.4
FH to their backhand · return+5.6±4.9+5.1+0.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1+4.7±4.5+1.4+3.3
FH to the middle · return+4.6±3.2+5.0−0.4
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.5±3.1+3.4+0.1
BH to their backhand · rally+3.3±3.4+0.9+2.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−3.7±4.1−2.3−1.4
FH to their backhand · rally−3.5±3.7−3.9+0.4
BH to their forehand · rally−1.9±4.6+0.9−2.8
BH to the middle · rally−1.5±2.6−0.6−0.8
FH to the middle · rally−1.3±3.0−0.7−0.6

Against Joao Fonseca-like opponents

Martin Klizan vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.2%37.5%
Players most similar to Joao Fonseca1 51.4%20.9%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Hubert Hurkacz, Fabian Marozsan, Sebastian Korda, Alexei Popyrin, Laslo Djere, Kei Nishikori, Dominic Thiem, Fernando Verdasco, Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Philipp Kohlschreiber. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.