RallyIQ

Game plan

Max Purcell v Thiago Seyboth Wild

Every number combines what Max Purcell does well with what Thiago Seyboth Wild allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Max Purcell wins, best of 3 58%90%: 27%–84% · best of 5: 60%
Serve points won 67.4% / 65.8% Max / Thiago · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 58%serve 67.4% / 65.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Max Purcell's record against Thiago Seyboth Wild's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMaxThiago
Direction choice+0.07 ±0.11
better than 77%
−0.07 ±0.10
better than 38%
Shot selection−0.99 ±0.83
better than 3%
+0.05 ±0.27
better than 59%
Execution−0.38 ±0.69
better than 49%
−0.65 ±0.44
better than 39%
Points left on the table2.73 ±0.17
lower than 38%
2.74 ±0.17
lower than 36%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Max Purcell serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMax winsv ThiagoMatchupOptimal
Wide55%68%75%70.0%±7.768% ▲
Body9%63%55%55.3%±14.10% ▼
T36%75%74%73.4%±8.432% ▼

Optimal v Thiago Seyboth Wild: +0.9±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMax winsv ThiagoMatchupOptimal
Wide45%77%75%79.2%±7.158% ▲
Body11%65%55%56.3%±14.90% ▼
T43%69%70%67.0%±8.842% ▼

Optimal v Thiago Seyboth Wild: +1.2±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +7.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Thiago Seyboth Wild serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowThiago winsv MaxMatchupOptimal
Wide49%68%79%74.9%±7.362% ▲
Body6%62%62%60.5%±14.00% ▼
T45%71%73%68.2%±8.438% ▼

Optimal v Max Purcell: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowThiago winsv MaxMatchupOptimal
Wide59%69%80%76.9%±7.451% ▼
Body5%68%63%67.5%±14.20% ▼
T36%70%78%76.4%±7.449% ▲

Optimal v Max Purcell: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Max Purcell returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
FH through the middle37%+4.3−0.9+2.0+5.4±2.8
FH crosscourt21%+5.5−2.2+3.4+6.7±4.4
FH down the line19%+1.7+1.0−0.4+2.2±4.4
FH slice through the middle16%−4.2+1.4−1.1−4.0±2.2
FH slice down the line4%−4.3−1.2−0.9−6.4±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.0±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (189 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
BH through the middle47%+6.4+1.3+0.7+8.4±2.6
BH crosscourt24%+8.8−1.4+2.5+10.0±3.4
BH slice through the middle16%−4.2−2.4−0.5−7.1±2.3
BH down the line9%+4.2−3.7+1.9+2.4±4.2
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5−0.5−1.6−1.6±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.5±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (148 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
BH through the middle51%−2.9+2.4−0.5−1.0±2.5
BH crosscourt35%+1.0−0.5+0.6+1.2±3.1
BH down the line14%−0.2+4.2−4.1−0.1±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.3±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (88 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Thiago Seyboth Wild returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaxValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3+1.2+0.1+5.6±2.9
FH down the line18%+1.7−0.7+1.5+2.4±4.4
FH slice through the middle14%−4.2−1.7−0.9−6.8±2.3
FH crosscourt12%+5.5−1.4+0.3+4.4±4.3
FH slice down the line6%−4.3−0.5−0.3−5.1±2.5

Lean FH through the middle: +3.8±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (311 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaxValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4+0.4−1.5+5.3±2.6
BH crosscourt26%+8.8−0.3−1.4+7.1±3.4
BH down the line13%+4.2−0.9+1.7+5.0±4.4
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.8−1.2−7.2±2.4
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−0.2−1.5−1.2±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.5±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (374 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaxValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5±0.0+2.9−0.6±2.8
FH down the line30%−1.8−2.9−1.7−6.4±3.9
FH crosscourt18%−0.2+2.6−0.8+1.6±3.5

Lean FH through the middle: +1.4±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (73 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaxValue
BH through the middle39%−2.9−1.2+0.9−3.2±2.5
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+0.4+0.2+1.7±3.3
FH through the middle10%−2.9±0.0+2.9±0.0±2.3
BH down the line10%−0.2+2.1−0.4+1.5±4.6
FH inside-out7%+1.0−1.8−1.7−2.4±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.4±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (210 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Max Purcell

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return+4.1±4.5+1.7+2.5
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.9±5.3±0.0+3.9
BH to the middle · return+2.9±3.3+0.8+2.0
FH to the middle · return+2.5±3.8+0.7+1.8
FH to the middle · rally+1.6±3.6−0.1+1.6
BH to their backhand · serve +1+0.7±4.8+0.4+0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−3.1±4.6−1.0−2.1
BH to their backhand · rally−2.6±3.8−0.8−1.8
FH to their forehand · serve +1−0.8±5.9+0.8−1.6
BH to the middle · rally−0.8±3.3−2.3+1.6
FH to their forehand · rally−0.7±4.7−3.9+3.2

Thiago Seyboth Wild

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+6.7±5.0+4.2+2.5
BH to their forehand · rally+5.0±5.9−0.5+5.5
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.6±3.9+0.3+3.4
FH to the middle · return+2.1±3.9+0.8+1.4
BH to their backhand · rally+1.1±3.9+0.1+1.1
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.1±5.6+2.0−0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−4.3±4.5−4.1−0.3
FH to the middle · rally−3.1±3.5−1.5−1.6
BH to the middle · rally−1.3±3.2+0.1−1.3
BH to the middle · serve +1−0.6±3.9−0.7+0.1
BH to their backhand · serve +1−0.4±5.0−1.2+0.9

Against Thiago Seyboth Wild-like opponents

Max Purcell vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.3%32.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Flavio Cobolli, Joao Fonseca, Hubert Hurkacz, Alexei Popyrin, Francisco Cerundolo, Aleksandar Vukic, Dominic Thiem, Lloyd Harris, Juan Ignacio Londero. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.