RallyIQ

Game plan

Maxime Cressy v Filip Krajinovic

Every number combines what Maxime Cressy does well with what Filip Krajinovic allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Maxime Cressy wins, best of 3 35%90%: 12%–66% · best of 5: 31%
Serve points won 65.1% / 68.4% Maxime / Filip · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 37%serve 65.1% / 67.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Maxime Cressy's record against Filip Krajinovic's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −0.2 on serve, −7.1 on return vs expectation (329 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMaximeFilip
Direction choice+0.07 ±0.13
better than 77%
−0.18 ±0.13
better than 17%
Shot selection+1.15 ±0.15
better than 99%
+0.05 ±0.15
better than 59%
Execution−1.85 ±0.64
better than 5%
+0.56 ±0.59
better than 85%
Points left on the table3.70 ±0.25
lower than 6%
2.78 ±0.29
lower than 32%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Maxime Cressy serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMaxime winsv FilipMatchupOptimal
Wide54%81%77%84.6%±3.967% ▲
Body5%68%60%64.9%±12.90% ▼
T40%81%78%83.5%±4.533% ▼

Optimal v Filip Krajinovic: +1.0±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMaxime winsv FilipMatchupOptimal
Wide64%78%79%83.2%±4.277% ▲
Body5%61%59%57.0%±14.30% ▼
T30%78%78%82.5%±5.323% ▼

Optimal v Filip Krajinovic: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Filip Krajinovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFilip winsv MaximeMatchupOptimal
Wide42%70%80%77.8%±5.055% ▲
Body7%53%67%56.7%±11.20% ▼
T51%69%77%71.2%±5.745% ▼

Optimal v Maxime Cressy: +1.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +4.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFilip winsv MaximeMatchupOptimal
Wide53%71%80%78.3%±5.166% ▲
Body5%63%68%67.1%±11.80% ▼
T42%69%78%75.9%±5.734% ▼

Optimal v Maxime Cressy: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Maxime Cressy returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FilipValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3±0.0+1.5+5.7±2.4
FH crosscourt34%+5.5−1.7+1.0+4.8±4.0
FH down the line12%+1.7−1.3+0.7+1.1±4.5
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.0+1.7−3.5±2.3
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+0.1+0.7−3.5±2.1

Lean FH through the middle: +1.8±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (584 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FilipValue
BH through the middle49%+6.4+0.5+1.5+8.5±2.2
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.8+1.7+8.7±3.3
BH down the line11%+4.2+2.9+7.0+14.2±4.6
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2−1.7+0.8−5.1±2.4
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5−2.6+3.4+1.3±2.8

Lean BH down the line: +6.5±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (471 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FilipValue
FH crosscourt37%−0.2−5.7+1.5−4.4±4.4
FH through the middle29%−3.5+1.6−0.2−2.0±2.9
FH slice through the middle19%−12.7+0.3+0.1−12.2±1.9
FH slice down the line9%−9.4−0.8±0.0−10.3±1.7
FH down the line7%−1.8+0.5+3.3+2.1±4.1

Lean FH through the middle: +3.2±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (129 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FilipValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9−8.6+1.0−10.5±2.2
BH crosscourt32%+1.0−1.0+0.8+0.8±3.2
BH down the line15%−0.2−3.8−1.5−5.5±5.0
BH slice through the middle5%−11.3−0.4±0.0−11.7±2.0
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.0+0.4+0.7−3.0±1.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.8±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (278 returns charted)

Filip Krajinovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3+1.5−1.2+4.5±2.5
FH down the line20%+1.7+0.4−2.0+0.1±4.4
FH crosscourt12%+5.5−0.8−2.7+2.0±4.3
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2+1.3−1.7−4.6±2.3
FH slice down the line2%−4.3+1.3+0.3−2.7±2.0

Lean FH through the middle: +2.5±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (257 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+2.2−1.4+7.2±2.3
BH crosscourt17%+8.8−0.8+1.1+9.1±3.5
BH slice through the middle14%−4.2+0.1−4.6−8.7±2.4
BH slice crosscourt11%+0.5−0.8+0.5+0.2±3.0
BH down the line10%+4.2+3.0+1.7+8.9±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.9±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (256 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
FH through the middle66%−3.5+1.4−1.7−3.8±2.7
FH crosscourt14%−0.2±0.0+0.4+0.2±4.0
FH down the line14%−1.8−1.1−0.1−3.0±4.3
BH through the middle6%+0.1+0.5−3.8−3.1±1.5

Lean FH through the middle: −0.7±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (95 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MaximeValue
BH through the middle56%−2.9+1.3−3.8−5.3±2.3
BH crosscourt29%+1.0+2.0−3.4−0.4±3.3
BH down the line13%−0.2+1.0−3.8−3.0±4.9
BH slice through the middle3%−11.3−0.2−4.8−16.3±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.5±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (212 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Maxime Cressy

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+3.4±4.6±0.0+3.4
FH to their forehand · return+2.7±5.7−0.3+2.9
BH slice to the middle · rally+1.7±2.9+0.9+0.8
FH to their forehand · rally+1.1±4.6−3.3+4.4
BH to the middle · rally+0.6±3.0−0.6+1.2
BH slice to the middle · return−0.1±2.8−1.7+1.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return−5.7±2.9−7.1+1.4
BH to their backhand · return +1−4.3±4.0−3.2−1.1
BH to their forehand · rally−4.1±5.4−3.3−0.7
FH to the middle · return +1−3.8±3.1−2.3−1.6
BH to their backhand · rally−3.8±3.2−5.6+1.8

Filip Krajinovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1+8.8±6.2+5.1+3.7
BH to their forehand · rally+7.6±5.5+2.8+4.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1+6.5±4.4+3.6+2.9
FH to their forehand · return +1+5.1±5.2+1.8+3.3
FH to their backhand · return +1+4.4±5.2−1.1+5.5
FH to the middle · return+3.8±3.4+3.0+0.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · serve +1−6.1±3.4−1.5−4.6
BH to their forehand · return +1−5.0±6.5−8.7+3.7
FH to their backhand · rally−4.1±4.3−3.4−0.7
BH to the middle · serve +1−4.0±3.3−1.1−2.8
BH to the middle · return−3.3±3.0−0.9−2.5

Against Filip Krajinovic-like opponents

Maxime Cressy vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.8%29.1%
Players most similar to Filip Krajinovic2 65.4%21.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Hubert Hurkacz, Ugo Humbert, Jakub Mensik, Novak Djokovic, Nuno Borges, Arthur Cazaux, Gregoire Barrere, Denis Istomin, Viktor Troicki. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.