RallyIQ

Game plan

Pierre Hugues Herbert v Lucas Pouille

Every number combines what Pierre Hugues Herbert does well with what Lucas Pouille allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Pierre Hugues Herbert wins, best of 3 63%90%: 34%–86% · best of 5: 66%
Serve points won 65.7% / 63.0% Pierre / Lucas · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 58%serve 65.3% / 63.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Pierre Hugues Herbert's record against Lucas Pouille's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +5.8 on serve, +7.3 on return vs expectation (254 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerPierreLucas
Direction choice+0.23 ±0.09
better than 96%
−0.02 ±0.08
better than 52%
Shot selection+0.64 ±0.24
better than 97%
+0.05 ±0.16
better than 60%
Execution−1.76 ±0.85
better than 6%
−0.99 ±0.48
better than 26%
Points left on the table2.66 ±0.20
lower than 42%
2.56 ±0.14
lower than 54%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Pierre Hugues Herbert −0.90, Lucas Pouille −1.20. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Pierre Hugues Herbert serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPierre winsv LucasMatchupOptimal
Wide45%71%77%75.5%±6.037% ▼
Body5%55%68%59.3%±13.70% ▼
T50%79%78%82.1%±5.163% ▲

Optimal v Lucas Pouille: +1.1±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +4.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPierre winsv LucasMatchupOptimal
Wide56%77%76%80.0%±5.169% ▲
Body6%69%63%68.9%±12.80% ▼
T38%71%78%78.0%±6.231% ▼

Optimal v Lucas Pouille: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Lucas Pouille serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowLucas winsv PierreMatchupOptimal
Wide44%71%74%71.6%±6.241% ▼
Body10%65%66%67.7%±10.90% ▼
T46%74%75%74.9%±6.359% ▲

Optimal v Pierre Hugues Herbert: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowLucas winsv PierreMatchupOptimal
Wide46%74%73%74.4%±6.360% ▲
Body7%61%73%71.0%±12.20% ▼
T47%74%73%75.3%±6.440% ▼

Optimal v Pierre Hugues Herbert: +0.2±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Pierre Hugues Herbert returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LucasValue
FH through the middle33%+4.3−3.2−0.3+0.8±2.7
FH crosscourt22%+5.5−2.4−0.9+2.3±4.4
FH down the line20%+1.7−0.6+3.1+4.2±4.4
FH slice crosscourt11%−4.3+1.4+1.7−1.3±2.7
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.5−0.1−4.9±2.3

Lean FH down the line: +3.4±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (255 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LucasValue
BH through the middle34%+6.4−2.2+0.2+4.4±2.5
BH crosscourt21%+8.8+0.7−1.1+8.4±3.4
BH down the line15%+4.2−0.9+0.8+4.1±4.6
BH slice crosscourt13%+0.5+0.6+0.6+1.7±3.0
BH slice through the middle13%−4.2−0.4+0.5−4.1±2.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.0±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (271 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LucasValue
FH through the middle45%−3.5+0.7−1.5−4.3±2.6
FH crosscourt30%−0.2+0.1−1.7−1.9±4.2
FH down the line25%−1.8−1.4−0.2−3.4±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.4±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (71 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LucasValue
BH crosscourt35%+1.0−3.3+1.5−0.7±3.0
BH through the middle34%−2.9−3.0+0.9−5.0±2.3
BH down the line20%−0.2−3.5+3.7+0.1±4.8
FH through the middle6%−2.9+0.3−1.5−4.1±1.9
FH inside-in4%+0.6−0.3−1.7−1.5±3.7

Lean BH down the line: +2.3±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (161 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Lucas Pouille returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PierreValue
FH through the middle35%+4.3+1.4+0.3+5.9±2.7
FH down the line21%+1.7−1.1−0.2+0.4±4.4
FH slice through the middle18%−4.2+1.2−1.0−4.0±2.2
FH crosscourt14%+5.5−0.4−2.6+2.4±4.4
FH slice down the line7%−4.3+1.1−0.6−3.7±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +4.6±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (462 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PierreValue
BH through the middle48%+6.4−3.4−4.2−1.1±2.4
BH crosscourt19%+8.8−1.3−1.1+6.5±3.4
BH down the line16%+4.2+0.6+0.3+5.2±4.5
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.4−2.5−7.1±2.5
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5+2.2−0.1+2.6±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.9±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (619 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PierreValue
FH through the middle56%−3.5−0.8−3.0−7.3±2.9
FH down the line23%−1.8−2.6−3.1−7.5±4.5
FH crosscourt21%−0.2−0.2−1.3−1.7±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.5±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (95 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PierreValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9−1.1−3.4−7.5±2.2
BH crosscourt27%+1.0−2.5−1.0−2.5±3.1
BH down the line18%−0.2+2.0+0.8+2.6±4.9
FH through the middle3%−2.9−0.6−3.0−6.5±2.2
FH inside-out3%+1.0+0.9−3.1−1.3±3.3

Lean BH down the line: +6.5±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (387 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Pierre Hugues Herbert

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+4.7±5.3+3.7+1.0
BH slice to their backhand · rally+3.0±3.6+1.7+1.4
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.6±4.5+1.3+1.3
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.6±4.6+0.8+1.8
BH to their forehand · return+2.3±6.1−3.1+5.4
FH to their backhand · return +1+0.9±5.2−1.9+2.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · rally−5.2±3.3−1.7−3.5
BH to their forehand · rally−4.8±5.8−2.1−2.7
FH to their backhand · rally−4.3±4.0−4.8+0.4
BH to the middle · return−3.5±3.0−4.2+0.7
BH to their backhand · rally−3.5±3.5−1.0−2.5

Lucas Pouille

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.3±3.6−1.2+4.6
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.3±4.6−1.5+4.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.3±4.4−0.7+4.0
BH to their backhand · serve +1+1.8±4.6−1.2+3.0
FH to their backhand · rally+1.7±3.7+1.6+0.1
FH to their backhand · return +1+0.8±5.3+1.6−0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−8.4±5.8−3.2−5.2
BH to the middle · return−8.0±2.8−2.0−6.0
BH to their forehand · return−3.4±6.1−2.1−1.3
FH to their forehand · return−3.3±6.0+0.1−3.4
BH slice to the middle · return−2.7±3.4−0.4−2.3

Against Lucas Pouille-like opponents

Pierre Hugues Herbert vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–65.0%30.5%
Players most similar to Lucas Pouille1 72.4%39.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Alexei Popyrin, James Duckworth, Zizou Bergs, Roman Safiullin, Fabio Fognini, Matteo Arnaldi, Otto Virtanen, Sam Querrey, Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Tomas Berdych. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.