Game plan

Richard Gasquet v Jonas Svensson

Every number combines what Richard Gasquet does well with what Jonas Svensson allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Richard Gasquet wins, best of 3 59%90%: 37%–79% · best of 5: 61%

Serve points won 64.0% / 62.2% Richard / Jonas · tour 63.8%

Strengths only, no similarity priors 59%serve 64.0% / 62.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Richard Gasquet's record against Jonas Svensson's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

Career	Richard	Jonas
Direction choice	+0.17 ±0.05 better than 91%	−0.30 ±0.19 better than 6%
Shot selection	−0.47 ±0.11 better than 12%	−0.33 ±0.25 better than 20%
Execution	+0.78 ±0.25 better than 91%	−0.50 ±0.41 better than 45%
Points left on the table	2.45 ±0.09 lower than 68%	3.29 ±0.46 lower than 11%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Richard Gasquet serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Richard wins	v Jonas	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	50%	68%	74%	68.7%±6.9	37% ▼
Body	5%	62%	67%	66.2%±10.4	5%
T	45%	75%	76%	76.0%±6.2	58% ▲

Optimal v Jonas Svensson: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Richard wins	v Jonas	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	52%	71%	71%	68.9%±7.0	44% ▼
Body	5%	56%	64%	56.1%±11.7	0% ▼
T	43%	69%	73%	70.3%±7.3	56% ▲

Optimal v Jonas Svensson: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Jonas Svensson serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Jonas wins	v Richard	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	56%	72%	74%	72.8%±5.3	69% ▲
Body	23%	63%	70%	69.5%±8.2	10% ▼
T	20%	69%	78%	73.0%±8.2	21%

Optimal v Richard Gasquet: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Jonas wins	v Richard	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	51%	62%	78%	68.7%±6.2	64% ▲
Body	21%	64%	63%	64.1%±9.8	20%
T	29%	56%	71%	54.7%±8.1	16% ▼

Optimal v Richard Gasquet: +0.9±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +5.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Richard Gasquet returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Jonas	Value
FH through the middle	49%	+4.3	−0.4	−0.5	+3.4±2.3
FH crosscourt	28%	+5.5	−2.1	+3.8	+7.2±3.7
FH down the line	17%	+1.7	+3.3	−0.2	+4.8±3.9
FH slice through the middle	4%	−4.2	+2.2	±0.0	−2.1±1.7
FH slice down the line	1%	−4.3	+2.2	±0.0	−2.1±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (1536 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Jonas	Value
BH slice through the middle	30%	−4.2	+3.4	+1.8	+1.0±2.0
BH slice crosscourt	22%	+0.5	+1.1	+5.1	+6.8±2.5
BH crosscourt	18%	+8.8	−1.0	−1.1	+6.6±3.1
BH through the middle	18%	+6.4	−2.2	−0.8	+3.5±2.4
BH slice down the line	6%	−8.4	+2.3	+0.3	−5.7±3.1

Lean BH slice crosscourt: +3.6±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1628 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Jonas	Value
FH through the middle	42%	−3.5	+0.4	−1.2	−4.3±2.7
FH crosscourt	37%	−0.2	−2.2	+2.6	+0.2±4.1
FH down the line	17%	−1.8	+3.8	−1.4	+0.7±4.7
BH through the middle	2%	+0.1	+0.6	−0.5	+0.2±1.7
FH slice through the middle	1%	−12.7	+0.3	±0.0	−12.4±1.0

Lean FH down the line: +2.4±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (364 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Jonas	Value
BH crosscourt	36%	+1.0	+0.4	+0.4	+1.9±2.6
BH through the middle	27%	−2.9	±0.0	−0.5	−3.3±2.1
BH slice crosscourt	15%	−4.0	−0.4	+1.1	−3.4±2.4
BH slice through the middle	11%	−11.3	+0.7	+1.3	−9.3±2.3
BH down the line	7%	−0.2	+2.2	−0.2	+1.8±4.1
FH inside-in	1%	+0.6	−0.4	+2.6	+2.7±4.1

Lean FH inside-in: +4.5±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1238 returns charted)

Jonas Svensson returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Richard	Value
FH through the middle	49%	+4.3	−2.1	+1.1	+3.3±2.3
FH down the line	32%	+1.7	+0.1	+2.1	+3.9±3.8
FH crosscourt	16%	+5.5	−1.0	+4.6	+9.1±3.6
FH slice through the middle	3%	−4.2	−0.2	+0.7	−3.7±1.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.9±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (167 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Richard	Value
BH through the middle	48%	+6.4	−2.2	+0.5	+4.7±2.2
BH crosscourt	26%	+8.8	−0.6	+2.1	+10.3±3.0
BH down the line	18%	+4.2	+1.6	+1.9	+7.7±4.3
BH slice crosscourt	5%	+0.5	+0.5	+3.4	+4.4±2.3
BH slice through the middle	4%	−4.2	±0.0	+1.6	−2.6±1.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.9±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (188 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Richard	Value
FH through the middle	48%	−3.5	+1.7	±0.0	−1.8±2.5
FH crosscourt	26%	−0.2	+2.4	+1.5	+3.7±3.7
FH down the line	26%	−1.8	+0.6	+1.6	+0.5±4.1

Lean FH through the middle: −2.0±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (50 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Richard	Value
BH through the middle	40%	−2.9	−0.3	+1.0	−2.1±2.0
BH crosscourt	29%	+1.0	+3.6	+2.0	+6.6±2.7
BH down the line	20%	−0.2	+1.5	−0.1	+1.2±4.2
BH slice crosscourt	6%	−4.0	+1.0	−1.9	−4.9±2.3
FH inside-in	3%	+0.6	−0.2	+1.5	+1.9±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.7±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (181 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Richard Gasquet

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their forehand · return	+5.3±5.4	±0.0	+5.3
BH slice to their backhand · return	+5.0±2.8	+0.3	+4.7
BH to their backhand · serve +1	+4.9±3.9	+1.7	+3.2
BH slice to their backhand · return +1	+3.6±3.4	+0.7	+2.9
BH slice to the middle · return	+3.2±2.5	+1.7	+1.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally	+2.7±2.3	+1.2	+1.5

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1	−5.1±5.0	−2.7	−2.4
FH to their forehand · rally	−4.5±3.5	−0.4	−4.1
FH to their forehand · return +1	−3.9±5.2	−1.3	−2.7
BH to the middle · rally	−2.9±2.6	+1.2	−4.1
FH to their backhand · rally	−2.1±3.3	+0.9	−3.0

Jonas Svensson

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their backhand · return	+5.7±4.7	+2.2	+3.5
FH to their forehand · return	+4.5±5.5	−1.2	+5.6
FH to the middle · serve +1	+2.0±3.2	+1.0	+1.0
BH to their forehand · return	+1.5±5.5	−0.3	+1.8
BH to their backhand · return	+1.4±3.3	−0.5	+1.8
FH to the middle · return	+1.1±2.9	−1.2	+2.3

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their backhand · return +1	−5.7±5.1	−5.1	−0.6
BH to their forehand · serve +1	−3.6±6.0	−1.7	−1.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1	−3.1±4.4	−3.0	−0.1
FH to the middle · rally	−3.0±2.7	−3.2	+0.2
BH to the middle · rally	−2.9±2.4	−4.0	+1.2

Against Jonas Svensson-like opponents

Richard Gasquet v	Matches	Serve pts won	Return pts won
All charted opponents	–	61.8%	33.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Carlos Alcaraz, Valentin Vacherot, Jaume Munar, Alex Michelsen, Bernabe Zapata Miralles, Carlos Berlocq, Guillermo Coria, Jiri Novak, Magnus Norman, Andrei Medvedev. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.