RallyIQ

Game plan

Valentin Vacherot v Jonas Svensson

Every number combines what Valentin Vacherot does well with what Jonas Svensson allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Valentin Vacherot wins, best of 3 58%90%: 29%–84% · best of 5: 61%
Serve points won 66.8% / 65.0% Valentin / Jonas · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 59%serve 66.7% / 64.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Valentin Vacherot's record against Jonas Svensson's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +2.9 on serve, −4.0 on return vs expectation (110 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerValentinJonas
Direction choice−0.01 ±0.14
better than 53%
−0.30 ±0.19
better than 6%
Shot selection+0.23 ±0.27
better than 74%
−0.33 ±0.25
better than 20%
Execution+0.01 ±1.07
better than 69%
−0.50 ±0.41
better than 45%
Points left on the table2.29 ±0.18
lower than 85%
3.29 ±0.46
lower than 11%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Valentin Vacherot serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowValentin winsv JonasMatchupOptimal
Wide44%69%74%69.8%±8.944%
Body23%69%67%72.4%±10.510% ▼
T33%79%76%79.8%±7.946% ▲

Optimal v Jonas Svensson: +0.4±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowValentin winsv JonasMatchupOptimal
Wide48%79%71%76.6%±8.161% ▲
Body18%60%64%60.4%±12.95% ▼
T34%69%73%70.3%±10.034%

Optimal v Jonas Svensson: +1.1±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +5.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Jonas Svensson serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJonas winsv ValentinMatchupOptimal
Wide56%72%74%73.0%±7.569% ▲
Body23%63%69%68.4%±11.710% ▼
T20%69%68%61.0%±11.921%

Optimal v Valentin Vacherot: +0.5±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJonas winsv ValentinMatchupOptimal
Wide51%62%74%63.8%±9.264% ▲
Body21%64%66%66.9%±12.820%
T29%56%67%50.7%±11.316% ▼

Optimal v Valentin Vacherot: +1.3±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving body every time would read +6.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Valentin Vacherot returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JonasValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3+0.3−0.5+4.1±3.0
FH down the line23%+1.7−0.3−0.2+1.1±4.5
FH crosscourt17%+5.5−1.3+3.8+8.0±4.3
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2−2.0±0.0−6.2±1.5
FH slice down the line4%−4.3−0.5±0.0−4.8±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.6±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (167 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JonasValue
BH through the middle43%+6.4+0.3−0.8+5.9±2.8
BH crosscourt38%+8.8+1.2−1.1+8.9±3.6
BH down the line13%+4.2−0.4−3.2+0.6±4.4
BH slice down the line3%−8.4−2.7+0.3−10.7±2.5
BH slice through the middle3%−4.2−0.9+1.8−3.3±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.4±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (176 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JonasValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5+0.4−1.2−4.2±2.8
FH crosscourt31%−0.2−0.9+2.6+1.5±4.1
FH down the line21%−1.8+0.4−1.4−2.8±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.6±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (48 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JonasValue
BH crosscourt46%+1.0+0.1+0.4+1.5±3.2
BH through the middle35%−2.9−0.3−0.5−3.6±2.5
BH down the line12%−0.2+0.8−0.2+0.3±3.6
FH through the middle7%−2.9−0.8−1.2−4.8±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.4±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (89 returns charted)

Jonas Svensson returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ValentinValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−2.1−1.9+0.3±3.0
FH down the line32%+1.7+0.1−4.1−2.3±4.5
FH crosscourt16%+5.5−1.0−3.5+1.0±4.1
FH slice through the middle3%−4.2−0.2−1.2−5.6±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.6±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (167 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ValentinValue
BH through the middle48%+6.4−2.2−0.4+3.9±2.8
BH crosscourt26%+8.8−0.6−2.0+6.2±3.6
BH down the line18%+4.2+1.6−0.1+5.7±4.3
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5+0.5−4.4−3.4±2.6
BH slice through the middle4%−4.2±0.0−3.6−7.8±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (188 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ValentinValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5+1.7−3.6−5.3±2.8
FH crosscourt26%−0.2+2.4−3.2−1.0±3.8
FH down the line26%−1.8+0.6−0.2−1.4±4.1

Lean FH through the middle: −2.2±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (50 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ValentinValue
BH through the middle40%−2.9−0.3+1.1−2.0±2.6
BH crosscourt29%+1.0+3.6−1.9+2.7±3.3
BH down the line20%−0.2+1.5+0.2+1.5±4.5
BH slice crosscourt6%−4.0+1.0±0.0−3.0±1.4
FH inside-in3%+0.6−0.2−3.2−2.8±3.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.9±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (181 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Valentin Vacherot

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+3.4±4.7−1.0+4.4
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.3±3.7+0.1+2.2
FH to the middle · rally+2.1±2.5+1.9+0.2
BH to the middle · return+1.3±2.5+0.6+0.7
BH to their backhand · return +1+1.1±3.4+0.3+0.8
BH to their backhand · return+0.8±3.3+0.9−0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1−4.2±4.1−2.7−1.5
BH to the middle · rally−3.5±2.3−1.6−1.9
FH to their backhand · return−2.9±3.9−1.8−1.1
FH to the middle · return−1.7±2.7−1.0−0.7
BH to their backhand · rally−1.7±2.4−0.9−0.8

Jonas Svensson

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally+1.9±2.9−0.7+2.6
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.1±3.6−1.1+2.2
BH slice to their backhand · rally+0.9±2.5+0.3+0.7
FH to their forehand · rally+0.7±3.2−2.0+2.7
BH to their backhand · serve +1+0.3±3.3+0.1+0.2
BH to their backhand · rally−0.4±2.4−0.7+0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return−4.5±2.7−0.8−3.7
BH to their backhand · return−3.1±3.2−0.2−2.8
BH to their backhand · return +1−1.8±3.5−0.8−0.9
BH to the middle · rally−1.6±2.3−3.3+1.7
BH to the middle · return−1.3±2.4−2.4+1.1

Against Jonas Svensson-like opponents

Valentin Vacherot vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–64.7%33.0%
Players most similar to Jonas Svensson1 62.7%27.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Carlos Alcaraz, Jaume Munar, Alex Michelsen, Bernabe Zapata Miralles, Carlos Berlocq, Guillermo Coria, Jiri Novak, Magnus Norman, Andrei Medvedev. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.