RallyIQ

Game plan

Albert Costa v Alex Corretja

Every number combines what Albert Costa does well with what Alex Corretja allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Albert Costa wins, best of 3 55%90%: 26%–80% · best of 5: 56%
Serve points won 55.9% / 55.0% Albert / Alex · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 49%serve 55.6% / 55.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Albert Costa's record against Alex Corretja's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (head-to-head: +10.8 on serve, +23.9 on return vs expectation (100 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerAlbertAlex
Direction choice+0.24 ±0.14
better than 97%
+0.07 ±0.11
better than 76%
Shot selection+0.14 ±0.18
better than 69%
−0.16 ±0.18
better than 33%
Execution+0.35 ±0.54
better than 81%
+0.38 ±0.51
better than 82%
Points left on the table2.18 ±0.14
lower than 94%
2.48 ±0.14
lower than 63%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Albert Costa serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlbert winsv AlexMatchupOptimal
Wide42%67%72%65.7%±8.355% ▲
Body12%68%61%66.0%±12.20% ▼
T46%71%74%70.5%±8.245%

Optimal v Alex Corretja: +0.4±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlbert winsv AlexMatchupOptimal
Wide64%64%68%58.9%±7.461% ▼
Body10%57%67%61.5%±13.40% ▼
T26%69%74%71.5%±10.139% ▲

Optimal v Alex Corretja: +0.4±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +9.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Alex Corretja serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlex winsv AlbertMatchupOptimal
Wide41%68%72%67.6%±9.342%
Body19%59%65%60.0%±13.25% ▼
T40%74%73%72.0%±8.153% ▲

Optimal v Albert Costa: +0.6±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlex winsv AlbertMatchupOptimal
Wide59%69%70%66.0%±7.772% ▲
Body12%64%57%58.5%±15.00% ▼
T28%67%75%70.6%±10.128%

Optimal v Albert Costa: +0.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Albert Costa returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3−0.5+0.8+4.6±2.9
FH down the line27%+1.7−0.8+2.2+3.0±4.4
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+0.1+2.3+8.0±4.2
FH slice through the middle7%−4.2−0.9−0.1−5.1±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.7±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (104 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
BH slice through the middle23%−4.2+0.2+2.1−2.0±2.4
BH crosscourt23%+8.8−1.1+1.6+9.3±3.3
BH through the middle21%+6.4−1.0+1.4+6.8±2.6
BH slice crosscourt17%+0.5+1.2+3.3+5.1±2.9
BH down the line9%+4.2+0.8+1.1+6.1±4.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.1±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (189 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
FH crosscourt58%−0.2−1.3+1.0−0.5±4.3
FH through the middle26%−3.5+0.7+1.4−1.4±2.6
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.2+2.9+1.4±3.9

Lean FH crosscourt: −0.1±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (57 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
BH crosscourt27%+1.0−0.6+0.1+0.4±3.0
BH through the middle22%−2.9−0.6+0.1−3.4±2.3
FH inside-out16%+1.0−0.3+2.9+3.6±3.5
FH through the middle15%−2.9−0.3+1.4−1.8±2.3
FH inside-in9%+0.6−2.1+1.0−0.6±3.9

Lean FH inside-out: +4.1±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (150 returns charted)

Alex Corretja returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
FH down the line34%+1.7−0.7+3.3+4.3±4.4
FH through the middle32%+4.3−1.2−0.7+2.3±3.0
FH crosscourt19%+5.5−4.7+0.5+1.3±4.4
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2−1.3+0.4−5.1±2.0
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−0.5±0.0−4.8±1.7

Lean FH down the line: +2.6±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (287 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
BH slice through the middle25%−4.2+0.8+2.3−1.1±2.4
BH slice crosscourt22%+0.5+3.0+3.1+6.5±2.9
BH through the middle22%+6.4−1.8−2.4+2.2±2.7
BH crosscourt16%+8.8+2.3−2.2+8.9±3.5
BH down the line10%+4.2−2.1+1.1+3.2±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.0±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (511 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
FH down the line43%−1.8+1.1+1.1+0.4±4.6
FH through the middle29%−3.5−1.7+1.8−3.4±2.8
FH crosscourt27%−0.2+1.0+3.5+4.2±4.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (113 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
BH crosscourt38%+1.0+1.6−0.6+2.0±3.1
BH through the middle24%−2.9+0.1−1.4−4.2±2.5
BH slice crosscourt11%−4.0+1.5+0.8−1.7±2.1
BH down the line8%−0.2−3.0+1.9−1.3±4.7
FH inside-out6%+1.0−0.8+1.1+1.3±3.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.2±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (379 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Albert Costa

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1+9.8±5.6+9.6+0.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+7.2±4.8+4.8+2.4
BH slice to their backhand · rally+3.7±3.4+1.9+1.8
FH to their forehand · rally+2.5±2.9+2.0+0.6
BH to their backhand · return+2.2±3.7+1.4+0.8
FH to their backhand · return +1+0.8±4.9+1.2−0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1−4.5±4.3−1.5−3.0
BH to their forehand · rally−3.2±4.2−0.9−2.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.5±3.6−0.8−1.6
BH to their backhand · return +1−1.8±4.0−0.6−1.2
FH to their backhand · rally−1.4±2.5+1.3−2.7

Alex Corretja

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+4.8±4.5−0.4+5.2
BH to their backhand · serve +1+4.0±3.9+0.8+3.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.2±3.9±0.0+3.2
FH to the middle · rally+2.0±2.8+1.0+1.0
BH to their backhand · rally+1.9±2.1+0.9+1.0
FH to their forehand · rally±0.0±3.0−1.6+1.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return−3.8±2.8−1.8−2.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.7±4.7+0.3−3.0
BH to their forehand · rally−2.2±4.8−0.6−1.6
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.1±5.6−0.9−1.3
FH to their backhand · return +1−2.0±5.1−0.4−1.6

Against Alex Corretja-like opponents

Albert Costa vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–57.6%40.2%
Alex Corretja (charted head-to-head)1 70.0%62.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Guillermo Garcia Lopez, David Nalbandian, Carlos Moya, Arnaud Clement, Wayne Ferreira, Marcelo Rios, Magnus Norman, Sergi Bruguera, Ivan Lendl. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head