RallyIQ

Game plan

Benoit Paire v Nikoloz Basilashvili

Every number combines what Benoit Paire does well with what Nikoloz Basilashvili allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Benoit Paire wins, best of 3 62%90%: 26%–90% · best of 5: 65%
Serve points won 64.0% / 61.5% Benoit / Nikoloz · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 61%serve 64.4% / 62.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Benoit Paire's record against Nikoloz Basilashvili's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −4.8 on serve, +7.4 on return vs expectation (238 points); head-to-head: −0.3 on serve, +3.4 on return vs expectation (140 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerBenoitNikoloz
Direction choice−0.04 ±0.08
better than 46%
±0.00 ±0.10
better than 58%
Shot selection−0.01 ±0.17
better than 52%
+0.16 ±0.12
better than 70%
Execution−1.09 ±0.52
better than 23%
−1.45 ±0.48
better than 11%
Points left on the table2.88 ±0.17
lower than 25%
2.22 ±0.18
lower than 90%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Benoit Paire serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBenoit winsv NikolozMatchupOptimal
Wide52%76%77%79.3%±4.365% ▲
Body5%65%63%64.5%±11.40% ▼
T43%77%80%82.2%±4.235% ▼

Optimal v Nikoloz Basilashvili: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBenoit winsv NikolozMatchupOptimal
Wide65%74%75%76.3%±4.678% ▲
Body6%61%63%60.4%±11.90% ▼
T29%72%72%71.8%±6.122% ▼

Optimal v Nikoloz Basilashvili: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Nikoloz Basilashvili serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNikoloz winsv BenoitMatchupOptimal
Wide55%71%73%71.1%±4.668% ▲
Body6%65%63%64.3%±10.80% ▼
T39%71%74%70.0%±5.832% ▼

Optimal v Benoit Paire: +0.2±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNikoloz winsv BenoitMatchupOptimal
Wide65%67%71%64.5%±5.452% ▼
Body6%61%62%60.0%±11.66%
T29%65%72%65.3%±6.342% ▲

Optimal v Benoit Paire: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Benoit Paire returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NikolozValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3+0.3+1.8+6.4±2.2
FH down the line21%+1.7+2.4+2.1+6.2±4.0
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2+0.8+1.4−2.0±2.3
FH crosscourt11%+5.5+1.5+0.1+7.1±4.3
FH slice down the line5%−4.3+5.2+1.6+2.5±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.0±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (926 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NikolozValue
BH through the middle48%+6.4+2.9+3.4+12.7±2.1
BH crosscourt35%+8.8+2.7+3.5+15.1±2.9
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2±0.0+1.5−2.7±2.5
BH down the line6%+4.2+0.7+1.6+6.6±4.6
BH slice down the line3%−8.4+0.6−0.1−8.0±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.8±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (636 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NikolozValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−1.2−0.3−5.0±2.5
FH down the line24%−1.8+2.7−0.8+0.1±4.6
FH crosscourt23%−0.2−0.6+0.3−0.5±4.4
BH through the middle3%+0.1+0.3+1.2+1.5±1.5
BH inside-in2%+2.5+0.1−0.9+1.7±2.7

Lean FH down the line: +2.3±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (333 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NikolozValue
BH crosscourt39%+1.0+0.8−0.9+0.8±2.8
BH through the middle36%−2.9−3.7+1.2−5.4±2.1
BH down the line25%−0.2+4.9−0.9+3.8±4.8

Lean BH down the line: +4.5±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (351 returns charted)

Nikoloz Basilashvili returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenoitValue
FH through the middle58%+4.3+0.8+1.6+6.7±2.3
FH crosscourt24%+5.5−1.0+2.3+6.7±4.3
FH down the line18%+1.7−5.2+2.6−0.9±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.4±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (370 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenoitValue
BH through the middle56%+6.4+1.6+0.3+8.2±2.1
BH crosscourt22%+8.8−4.1+1.9+6.5±3.3
BH down the line11%+4.2+1.9+7.3+13.4±4.6
BH slice through the middle5%−4.2+1.3−1.1−4.0±2.2
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−1.2+2.4+1.7±2.9

Lean BH down the line: +6.1±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (398 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenoitValue
FH through the middle57%−3.5+0.9+1.5−1.0±2.5
FH crosscourt28%−0.2+0.5−2.7−2.5±4.0
FH down the line15%−1.8±0.0+1.9+0.1±4.3

Lean FH down the line: +1.4±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (131 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenoitValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9+0.8+1.4−0.6±1.9
BH crosscourt37%+1.0−2.1−1.2−2.2±2.7
BH down the line13%−0.2−1.4+2.5+0.9±4.7
FH inside-in2%+0.6−0.6−2.7−2.8±3.3
FH through the middle2%−2.9−1.2+1.5−2.6±1.6

Lean BH down the line: +2.0±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (347 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Benoit Paire

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1+5.7±5.3+6.0−0.3
BH to their backhand · return+4.9±4.6+1.3+3.6
BH to their forehand · return+4.4±5.0+4.5−0.1
FH to their backhand · return+3.9±4.5+2.9+0.9
BH to the middle · return+3.3±3.3+0.4+2.9
FH slice to the middle · rally+1.4±2.8−0.2+1.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−9.1±4.2−4.9−4.2
BH to their backhand · return +1−8.6±4.8−7.5−1.0
FH to their forehand · return +1−7.7±4.6−4.9−2.7
BH to their backhand · rally−6.4±3.8−3.5−2.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1−6.1±4.8−5.8−0.4

Nikoloz Basilashvili

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+4.8±3.3+3.4+1.4
FH to the middle · return+3.8±3.6+2.8+1.0
FH to their backhand · return +1+3.6±4.7−0.4+4.0
BH to their forehand · serve +1+3.6±5.3+1.4+2.3
BH to their forehand · return+3.1±5.0−1.1+4.2
FH to the middle · return +1+3.1±3.1−0.1+3.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−10.6±4.5−5.8−4.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1−7.3±4.0−4.4−2.9
BH to the middle · serve +1−3.9±3.2−3.4−0.5
FH to the middle · rally−3.0±3.1−2.2−0.8
FH to their backhand · return−2.8±3.6−4.9+2.1

Against Nikoloz Basilashvili-like opponents

Benoit Paire vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–59.1%36.2%
Players most similar to Nikoloz Basilashvili1 56.8%43.4%
Nikoloz Basilashvili (charted head-to-head)1 61.6%43.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Arthur Fils, Alexander Shevchenko, Marin Cilic, Jan Lennard Struff, Roman Safiullin, Sebastian Ofner, Lloyd Harris, Aslan Karatsev, Thomaz Bellucci, Paul Henri Mathieu. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head