RallyIQ

Game plan

Borna Coric v Roberto Carballes Baena

Every number combines what Borna Coric does well with what Roberto Carballes Baena allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Borna Coric wins, best of 3 58%90%: 32%–81% · best of 5: 60%
Serve points won 65.3% / 63.6% Borna / Roberto · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 63%serve 65.3% / 62.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Borna Coric's record against Roberto Carballes Baena's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −0.5 on serve, −12.5 on return vs expectation (249 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerBornaRoberto
Direction choice+0.17 ±0.06
better than 91%
−0.06 ±0.09
better than 41%
Shot selection−0.12 ±0.13
better than 37%
+0.14 ±0.19
better than 68%
Execution−0.53 ±0.35
better than 43%
+0.70 ±0.38
better than 89%
Points left on the table2.25 ±0.10
lower than 88%
2.61 ±0.12
lower than 48%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Borna Coric +0.16, Roberto Carballes Baena +0.84. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Borna Coric serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBorna winsv RobertoMatchupOptimal
Wide42%71%71%69.2%±5.355% ▲
Body5%58%62%56.2%±12.60% ▼
T52%73%75%73.5%±5.445% ▼

Optimal v Roberto Carballes Baena: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBorna winsv RobertoMatchupOptimal
Wide49%73%73%73.3%±5.242% ▼
Body6%59%63%58.1%±13.20% ▼
T45%72%73%73.5%±5.558% ▲

Optimal v Roberto Carballes Baena: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Roberto Carballes Baena serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRoberto winsv BornaMatchupOptimal
Wide46%68%78%73.5%±4.759% ▲
Body12%56%56%49.2%±11.10% ▼
T42%72%76%73.9%±5.441%

Optimal v Borna Coric: +1.2±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRoberto winsv BornaMatchupOptimal
Wide61%63%76%66.5%±5.260%
Body15%61%59%57.0%±10.62% ▼
T25%63%74%65.3%±7.138% ▲

Optimal v Borna Coric: +0.7±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Borna Coric returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobertoValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−1.2+1.6+4.6±2.2
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−0.9+3.3+7.9±4.0
FH down the line13%+1.7+0.2−1.2+0.7±4.4
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2−2.6−0.6−7.4±2.3
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−3.0+0.1−7.2±2.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.9±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (791 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobertoValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4−1.8+1.3+5.9±2.1
BH crosscourt39%+8.8−2.2+0.6+7.2±2.8
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.2−1.2−5.6±2.5
BH down the line6%+4.2−4.0−1.0−0.8±4.6
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.3−2.1−1.9±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.8±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (704 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobertoValue
FH through the middle42%−3.5−2.6+0.4−5.7±2.7
FH crosscourt35%−0.2−4.3+0.8−3.7±4.3
FH down the line21%−1.8+0.8±0.0−1.0±4.7
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−1.2±0.0−13.9±1.0

Lean FH down the line: +3.2±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (266 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobertoValue
BH crosscourt56%+1.0−0.4+0.6+1.2±2.7
BH through the middle34%−2.9−1.0+1.1−2.7±2.3
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.1−2.4−2.5±5.0
FH through the middle1%−2.9+0.7+0.4−1.7±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.7±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (534 returns charted)

Roberto Carballes Baena returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
FH through the middle48%+4.3+1.9−0.6+5.6±2.2
FH down the line28%+1.7+2.6−2.1+2.2±4.0
FH crosscourt10%+5.5+0.3−0.8+5.0±4.2
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.8+1.3−3.7±2.3
FH slice down the line4%−4.3+1.3+0.9−2.0±3.0

Lean FH through the middle: +2.3±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (452 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+0.1+0.5+7.0±2.2
BH crosscourt37%+8.8+2.0−1.6+9.2±3.1
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2+0.4+0.2−3.6±2.2
BH down the line8%+4.2+0.4−0.9+3.7±4.5
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5−0.1+0.9+1.4±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.7±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (393 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
FH through the middle45%−3.5+0.9−0.1−2.7±2.6
FH down the line43%−1.8−0.8−1.0−3.6±4.6
FH crosscourt13%−0.2+1.0−0.7+0.1±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.9±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (148 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
BH crosscourt38%+1.0−0.9+0.6+0.7±2.7
BH through the middle33%−2.9+0.9+0.6−1.4±2.1
FH inside-out11%+1.0−0.1−1.0−0.2±3.6
FH through the middle11%−2.9+0.9−0.1−2.1±2.2
BH down the line4%−0.2−0.3−5.6−6.1±4.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.4±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (297 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Borna Coric

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.4±2.4+0.1+3.3
FH volley to their forehand · rally+2.3±5.8+0.7+1.5
BH to their forehand · return +1+2.0±4.8+0.6+1.4
BH slice to their backhand · rally+1.8±1.9+0.2+1.6
FH to their backhand · rally+1.7±1.8−0.9+2.5
FH to the middle · return +1+1.6±2.6−1.0+2.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return−4.9±4.2−3.6−1.3
BH to their forehand · rally−3.4±3.1−1.8−1.6
BH slice to the middle · rally−3.0±2.2−2.0−1.0
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−2.8±2.7−2.5−0.3
FH to their backhand · return +1−2.4±3.5−2.3−0.1

Roberto Carballes Baena

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally+4.2±1.9+2.9+1.3
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.4±2.6+1.5+1.9
FH to the middle · return +1+3.0±2.5+1.1+1.9
FH slice to the middle · rally+2.9±3.0+0.5+2.5
BH to the middle · return +1+2.5±2.1+1.4+1.1
FH to the middle · rally+2.5±1.5+2.6−0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−2.0±3.1−0.2−1.8
BH to their forehand · rally−2.0±3.2+0.4−2.4
BH slice to their backhand · rally−1.7±2.1−1.8+0.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1−1.4±2.4−0.9−0.5
BH slice to the middle · rally−1.1±2.1−1.4+0.3

Against Roberto Carballes Baena-like opponents

Borna Coric vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–64.0%33.8%
Players most similar to Roberto Carballes Baena3 59.7%19.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Mariano Navone, Novak Djokovic, Jaume Munar, Roberto Bautista Agut, Pedro Martinez, Bernabe Zapata Miralles, Pablo Andujar, Mikhail Kukushkin, Guillermo Coria, Sergi Bruguera. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.