RallyIQ

Game plan

Cameron Norrie v Alexei Popyrin

Every number combines what Cameron Norrie does well with what Alexei Popyrin allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Cameron Norrie wins, best of 3 64%90%: 39%–83% · best of 5: 67%
Serve points won 66.1% / 63.3% Cameron / Alexei · tour 64.0%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 60%serve 65.4% / 63.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Cameron Norrie's record against Alexei Popyrin's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +7.0 on serve, +1.1 on return vs expectation (307 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerCameronAlexei
Direction choice−0.04 ±0.08
better than 46%
+0.04 ±0.06
better than 69%
Shot selection+0.49 ±0.17
better than 92%
+0.29 ±0.15
better than 79%
Execution+0.02 ±0.39
better than 69%
−0.73 ±0.59
better than 36%
Points left on the table2.83 ±0.14
lower than 28%
2.71 ±0.10
lower than 39%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Cameron Norrie +1.01, Alexei Popyrin +0.60. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Cameron Norrie serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCameron winsv AlexeiMatchupOptimal
Wide37%70%73%70.0%±5.251% ▲
Body9%63%64%63.2%±9.40% ▼
T53%67%75%67.1%±4.949% ▼

Optimal v Alexei Popyrin: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCameron winsv AlexeiMatchupOptimal
Wide62%71%74%72.6%±4.357% ▼
Body8%64%69%69.2%±9.80% ▼
T30%79%73%79.7%±4.743% ▲

Optimal v Alexei Popyrin: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +5.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Alexei Popyrin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlexei winsv CameronMatchupOptimal
Wide45%73%75%74.5%±4.342% ▼
Body9%62%62%60.7%±9.40% ▼
T45%78%79%81.5%±3.958% ▲

Optimal v Cameron Norrie: +0.9±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +5.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlexei winsv CameronMatchupOptimal
Wide52%76%79%81.6%±3.865% ▲
Body5%63%63%62.3%±11.40% ▼
T43%74%69%70.6%±5.235% ▼

Optimal v Cameron Norrie: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Cameron Norrie returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexeiValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3−0.2+1.7+5.8±2.2
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+2.4−4.4+3.6±4.0
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2−0.8+0.3−4.8±2.3
FH down the line12%+1.7−2.2+1.7+1.2±4.3
FH slice crosscourt6%−4.3+0.3+1.5−2.6±2.8

Lean FH through the middle: +3.4±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (709 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexeiValue
BH through the middle48%+6.4+0.7+0.5+7.7±2.0
BH crosscourt35%+8.8−0.8+1.0+9.0±3.1
BH down the line8%+4.2−0.4−0.9+2.9±4.3
BH slice through the middle5%−4.2+0.8−2.0−5.4±2.4
BH slice down the line2%−8.4−0.4−3.4−12.2±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.5±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (862 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexeiValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5−0.5+0.3−3.7±2.5
FH crosscourt43%−0.2+0.8−3.4−2.9±4.1
FH down the line10%−1.8−2.7+1.5−2.9±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.4±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (263 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexeiValue
BH crosscourt44%+1.0−0.7+3.2+3.5±3.0
BH through the middle31%−2.9+1.5−0.4−1.8±2.1
FH inside-in10%+0.6−0.1−3.4−2.9±4.3
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.8+0.3−1.8±2.2
BH down the line4%−0.2−0.9−2.2−3.3±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.1±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (490 returns charted)

Alexei Popyrin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CameronValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3+1.5±0.0+5.8±2.2
FH down the line21%+1.7+1.8−1.9+1.7±4.3
FH crosscourt19%+5.5+3.3+2.8+11.7±4.0
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−1.3−1.2−6.7±2.3
FH slice down the line4%−4.3−0.6−0.6−5.5±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.5±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (584 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CameronValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+1.0+2.7+10.1±1.8
BH down the line20%+4.2−1.4−1.5+1.3±4.1
BH slice through the middle15%−4.2+0.8+2.2−1.3±2.2
BH crosscourt13%+8.8+1.6+4.3+14.7±3.2
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5−3.0+2.1−0.3±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +9.2±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (633 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CameronValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5−0.9−0.5−4.9±2.5
FH crosscourt32%−0.2+5.2+1.5+6.4±4.2
FH down the line21%−1.8−4.1−1.4−7.3±4.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +8.1±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (139 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CameronValue
BH through the middle37%−2.9−4.1+1.5−5.4±2.0
BH down the line21%−0.2−1.5+0.9−0.8±4.8
BH crosscourt18%+1.0−3.2±0.0−2.1±2.9
FH through the middle10%−2.9−2.4−0.5−5.7±2.1
FH inside-out9%+1.0−1.3−1.4−1.7±3.7

Lean BH down the line: +2.7±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (463 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Cameron Norrie

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1+7.3±4.3+3.8+3.6
FH to their backhand · return +1+6.0±4.1+3.9+2.1
BH to their forehand · return +1+5.4±6.1+0.8+4.6
BH to their forehand · return+5.1±4.8+0.9+4.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1+5.1±5.5+2.5+2.6
FH to the middle · rally+4.3±2.0+1.6+2.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−5.9±4.2+0.5−6.4
BH slice to their backhand · rally−5.7±3.5−2.5−3.2
FH volley to their forehand · rally−5.3±8.4−1.9−3.4
BH to their backhand · return−4.7±3.9−2.6−2.1
FH to their forehand · return−4.1±5.5−6.5+2.4

Alexei Popyrin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+6.1±3.1+1.6+4.5
BH slice to the middle · return+4.6±3.0+2.1+2.5
BH to their forehand · serve +1+4.0±6.1−0.4+4.4
BH to the middle · return+3.2±1.8−0.8+4.0
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.6±4.7+1.7+0.9
BH to their forehand · return+2.2±4.2−0.3+2.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally−11.0±8.4−4.4−6.6
BH to their backhand · rally−6.2±2.6−5.0−1.2
BH to their backhand · return−4.8±3.7−2.4−2.3
BH to their forehand · rally−3.0±4.0−4.9+1.9
BH to their backhand · return +1−2.8±4.3+0.6−3.4

Against Alexei Popyrin-like opponents

Cameron Norrie vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–62.6%33.9%
Players most similar to Alexei Popyrin3 70.7%32.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Joao Fonseca, Hubert Hurkacz, Tallon Griekspoor, Zizou Bergs, Thanasi Kokkinakis, Dominic Thiem, Lucas Pouille, Lloyd Harris, Jo Wilfried Tsonga. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.