RallyIQ

Game plan

Casper Ruud v Guillermo Coria

Every number combines what Casper Ruud does well with what Guillermo Coria allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Casper Ruud wins, best of 3 55%90%: 29%–79% · best of 5: 56%
Serve points won 62.9% / 62.0% Casper / Guillermo · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 59%serve 63.4% / 61.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Casper Ruud's record against Guillermo Coria's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.0 on serve, −0.8 on return vs expectation (2654 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerCasperGuillermo
Direction choice−0.03 ±0.05
better than 49%
+0.01 ±0.16
better than 60%
Shot selection−0.02 ±0.09
better than 51%
−0.12 ±0.21
better than 37%
Execution+0.87 ±0.19
better than 93%
+0.97 ±0.53
better than 95%
Points left on the table2.68 ±0.08
lower than 40%
2.43 ±0.21
lower than 70%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Casper Ruud serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCasper winsv GuillermoMatchupOptimal
Wide48%75%69%71.7%±4.553% ▲
Body9%64%55%55.9%±9.70% ▼
T43%78%70%73.1%±4.547% ▲

Optimal v Guillermo Coria: +0.6±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCasper winsv GuillermoMatchupOptimal
Wide52%71%65%62.8%±4.946% ▼
Body7%60%65%62.1%±10.50% ▼
T41%72%74%74.2%±5.154% ▲

Optimal v Guillermo Coria: +0.9±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Guillermo Coria serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowGuillermo winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide53%64%73%63.7%±4.464% ▲
Body10%71%63%70.9%±8.012% ▲
T37%68%74%66.9%±5.724% ▼

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +5.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowGuillermo winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide55%62%71%59.3%±4.554%
Body12%63%62%62.5%±8.20% ▼
T33%63%73%64.1%±5.746% ▲

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Casper Ruud returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GuillermoValue
FH through the middle37%+4.3+0.7+1.7+6.7±2.0
FH slice through the middle27%−4.2−0.7−0.6−5.5±1.8
FH down the line13%+1.7+1.2+1.8+4.6±3.7
FH crosscourt11%+5.5−1.3+2.0+6.3±3.6
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+1.5−0.1−2.9±2.4

Lean FH through the middle: +4.7±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (2447 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GuillermoValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+1.2+1.0+8.6±1.7
BH crosscourt31%+8.8+2.4+1.2+12.4±2.3
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.7+1.4−4.6±2.1
BH down the line8%+4.2+3.2+1.6+9.1±4.1
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.7+4.0+3.9±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.6±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (3085 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GuillermoValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5+1.8+1.3−0.4±2.3
FH crosscourt30%−0.2+1.1+3.1+4.0±3.8
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.8+3.0+2.1±4.4
FH slice through the middle5%−12.7+0.2±0.0−12.5±1.7
BH through the middle1%+0.1+0.3+0.3+0.7±1.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.3±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (709 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GuillermoValue
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+0.4−0.2+1.2±2.6
BH through the middle25%−2.9−1.2+0.3−3.8±2.1
FH through the middle17%−2.9−0.2+1.3−1.8±2.0
FH inside-in10%+0.6+2.1+3.1+5.7±3.7
FH inside-out9%+1.0−1.6+3.0+2.4±3.2

Lean FH inside-in: +6.0±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (2232 returns charted)

Guillermo Coria returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3−0.6+0.8+4.4±2.0
FH crosscourt27%+5.5+0.6+2.7+8.8±3.4
FH down the line13%+1.7±0.0−3.0−1.2±3.6
FH slice through the middle10%−4.2+0.9−1.0−4.3±2.1
FH slice crosscourt4%−4.3±0.0−0.3−4.6±2.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.2±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (384 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH through the middle49%+6.4−1.8+0.7+5.3±1.7
BH crosscourt33%+8.8+0.1−0.3+8.6±2.4
BH down the line7%+4.2+0.5−0.4+4.3±3.8
BH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.7−1.0−6.8±2.1
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5−3.1−1.1−3.7±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.6±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (481 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.1+0.4−1.9±2.3
FH crosscourt37%−0.2+3.4−4.0−0.8±3.9
FH down the line12%−1.8+0.4−1.8−3.1±3.8
BH through the middle4%+0.1+0.3±0.0+0.4±1.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.8±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (139 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH crosscourt41%+1.0−0.1−1.0−0.1±2.2
BH through the middle38%−2.9+2.5±0.0−0.4±1.7
BH down the line9%−0.2−1.1+3.4+2.1±4.2
FH through the middle5%−2.9+0.6+0.4−1.9±1.9
FH inside-in4%+0.6−0.9−4.0−4.3±3.5

Lean BH down the line: +2.4±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (399 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Casper Ruud

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally+6.3±5.7+5.5+0.8
BH to their backhand · return+5.2±1.9+2.4+2.8
BH to the middle · return+4.5±1.5+1.8+2.7
BH to their forehand · return+4.5±3.6+2.6+1.9
FH to their backhand · return +1+4.1±2.8+2.9+1.2
BH slice to their backhand · return+3.9±2.7±0.0+4.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−5.0±4.1−1.6−3.4
FH to the middle · return +1−2.9±2.1−0.2−2.8
FH to the middle · serve +1−2.0±1.9+1.2−3.1
BH slice to the middle · rally−1.1±1.8−0.6−0.4
BH slice to the middle · return+0.1±2.1−1.9+2.0

Guillermo Coria

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+4.6±3.4+3.0+1.6
BH to their forehand · rally+3.6±2.2+2.5+1.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1+3.5±3.8+2.3+1.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.7±2.5+1.5+1.2
FH to their forehand · return+2.2±3.2+1.3+0.8
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.2±3.2+1.1+1.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · rally−5.3±2.0−2.4−2.9
BH slice to their backhand · rally−4.3±2.1−1.7−2.6
FH to their backhand · return−2.4±3.1−0.1−2.3
FH drop shot to their backhand · rally−2.3±4.8+0.7−3.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.2±2.1−1.9−0.2

Against Guillermo Coria-like opponents

Casper Ruud vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.3%36.7%
Players most similar to Guillermo Coria16 63.2%36.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Novak Djokovic, Jenson Brooksby, Jaume Munar, Roberto Bautista Agut, Pablo Carreno Busta, Roberto Carballes Baena, Bernabe Zapata Miralles, Pablo Andujar, Mikhail Kukushkin, Carlos Berlocq. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.