RallyIQ

Game plan

Daniil Medvedev v Mariano Navone

Every number combines what Daniil Medvedev does well with what Mariano Navone allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Daniil Medvedev wins, best of 3 89%90%: 64%–98% · best of 5: 93%
Serve points won 63.5% / 54.3% Daniil / Mariano · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 85%serve 62.6% / 54.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Daniil Medvedev's record against Mariano Navone's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.7 on serve, +0.9 on return vs expectation (3649 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerDaniilMariano
Direction choice+0.01 ±0.04
better than 58%
−0.01 ±0.09
better than 54%
Shot selection−0.06 ±0.04
better than 46%
−0.08 ±0.23
better than 43%
Execution+1.24 ±0.16
better than 98%
+0.24 ±0.59
better than 77%
Points left on the table2.31 ±0.06
lower than 84%
2.33 ±0.12
lower than 81%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Daniil Medvedev +1.50, Mariano Navone +0.84. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Daniil Medvedev serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDaniil winsv MarianoMatchupOptimal
Wide49%74%69%70.6%±5.262% ▲
Body4%63%61%61.0%±11.00% ▼
T46%78%64%68.4%±6.138% ▼

Optimal v Mariano Navone: +0.2±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDaniil winsv MarianoMatchupOptimal
Wide49%78%61%67.2%±5.340% ▼
Body5%60%51%47.6%±12.30% ▼
T47%74%64%66.5%±6.660% ▲

Optimal v Mariano Navone: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Mariano Navone serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMariano winsv DaniilMatchupOptimal
Wide32%64%69%59.7%±6.845% ▲
Body18%50%58%44.3%±8.25% ▼
T49%65%71%60.3%±6.150%

Optimal v Daniil Medvedev: +0.9±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMariano winsv DaniilMatchupOptimal
Wide52%62%69%58.3%±5.739% ▼
Body20%59%58%54.4%±8.421%
T27%67%70%64.3%±7.640% ▲

Optimal v Daniil Medvedev: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Daniil Medvedev returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3+1.4+2.7+8.3±2.2
FH crosscourt22%+5.5+3.4+4.9+13.8±3.3
FH down the line15%+1.7−0.5+1.3+2.5±3.5
FH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.1−0.6−5.9±1.4
FH slice down the line4%−4.3−0.1±0.0−4.4±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.4±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (5958 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
BH through the middle48%+6.4+3.1+1.9+11.4±1.6
BH crosscourt25%+8.8+2.4+1.7+12.9±2.3
BH down the line10%+4.2+1.6+2.2+8.0±3.8
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−1.9+0.1−6.0±1.8
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−4.5−1.3−5.2±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.5±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (4981 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
FH through the middle50%−3.5+1.6+1.6−0.3±2.3
FH crosscourt27%−0.2−1.0+2.3+1.0±3.7
FH down the line17%−1.8+1.7−2.0−2.2±4.1
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−0.8±0.0−13.5±1.7
BH through the middle2%+0.1+1.2−0.4+0.8±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.6±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (1558 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
BH through the middle51%−2.9+2.9−0.4−0.4±1.9
BH crosscourt38%+1.0+1.9+1.5+4.4±2.5
BH down the line9%−0.2+1.2+0.3+1.3±4.2
FH through the middle1%−2.9−1.0+1.6−2.3±2.4
FH inside-in1%+0.6−2.8+2.3±0.0±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.9±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (2951 returns charted)

Mariano Navone returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3+1.2+1.6+7.0±2.1
FH crosscourt22%+5.5−0.1±0.0+5.5±3.4
FH down the line17%+1.7±0.0−0.7+0.9±3.5
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.1+1.1−3.2±1.8
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−0.3−0.7−5.3±2.3

Lean FH through the middle: +3.1±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (237 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+1.7+2.0+10.0±2.0
BH crosscourt40%+8.8+0.1+1.0+9.9±2.7
BH down the line11%+4.2+1.6+1.1+6.9±3.8
BH slice through the middle3%−4.2−0.3−0.6−5.1±1.5

Lean BH through the middle: +0.9±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (268 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5+1.2+1.1−1.2±2.2
FH crosscourt32%−0.2+1.8−1.3+0.3±3.3
FH down the line21%−1.8−1.8−0.3−3.9±3.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.6±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (84 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DaniilValue
BH crosscourt49%+1.0+0.5+0.6+2.2±2.4
BH through the middle45%−2.9−0.1+0.4−2.5±1.9
BH down the line6%−0.2−0.2+1.6+1.1±3.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (153 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Daniil Medvedev

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+7.3±3.4+2.7+4.6
BH to the middle · return+6.0±1.4+2.9+3.1
BH to their backhand · return+5.3±2.0+1.6+3.6
BH to their forehand · return+4.9±3.5+2.4+2.5
FH to the middle · return+4.4±1.9+2.0+2.3
BH to the middle · return +1+3.8±1.8+2.1+1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−4.4±2.4−2.0−2.4
BH slice to the middle · rally−4.2±1.9−1.9−2.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1−3.6±2.8−1.3−2.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.3±1.9−2.0−1.3
FH to their backhand · rally−1.0±1.7−0.7−0.3

Mariano Navone

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return +1+3.6±1.9+2.6+1.0
FH to the middle · return+3.0±1.8+1.9+1.1
BH to the middle · rally+2.9±1.2+1.5+1.4
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.8±2.2+1.0+1.8
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.5±3.2+0.8+1.7
BH to the middle · return+2.3±1.6+1.2+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−3.0±3.1−2.4−0.6
BH slice to their backhand · rally−2.1±1.9−4.0+1.9
FH to their backhand · rally−1.8±1.5−1.3−0.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1−1.3±2.9−1.1−0.2
FH to their backhand · return +1−0.2±3.1+0.1−0.3

Against Mariano Navone-like opponents

Daniil Medvedev vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.1%39.4%
Players most similar to Mariano Navone22 63.5%38.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Novak Djokovic, Roberto Bautista Agut, Francisco Cerundolo, Federico Coria, Rafael Nadal, Roberto Carballes Baena, Pablo Andujar, Juan Martin Del Potro, Nikolay Davydenko, Juan Carlos Ferrero. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.