RallyIQ

Game plan

Florian Mayer v Pedro Martinez

Every number combines what Florian Mayer does well with what Pedro Martinez allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Florian Mayer wins, best of 3 45%90%: 21%–72% · best of 5: 44%
Serve points won 63.0% / 63.9% Florian / Pedro · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 46%serve 63.2% / 64.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Florian Mayer's record against Pedro Martinez's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −10.3 on serve, +4.7 on return vs expectation (93 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerFlorianPedro
Direction choice+0.15 ±0.13
better than 88%
−0.06 ±0.08
better than 43%
Shot selection−1.03 ±0.34
better than 2%
−0.06 ±0.23
better than 46%
Execution−0.08 ±0.37
better than 64%
+0.23 ±0.43
better than 77%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Florian Mayer serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFlorian winsv PedroMatchupOptimal
Wide42%71%75%73.8%±7.455% ▲
Body15%68%70%73.6%±10.72% ▼
T42%65%76%65.8%±8.343%

Optimal v Pedro Martinez: +0.3±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFlorian winsv PedroMatchupOptimal
Wide42%71%71%69.4%±8.542%
Body17%62%56%55.3%±13.04% ▼
T41%68%73%68.9%±8.754% ▲

Optimal v Pedro Martinez: +1.0±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Pedro Martinez serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPedro winsv FlorianMatchupOptimal
Wide41%65%81%75.3%±7.754% ▲
Body11%59%67%62.7%±12.40% ▼
T48%68%78%71.7%±8.346% ▼

Optimal v Florian Mayer: +0.7±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPedro winsv FlorianMatchupOptimal
Wide54%63%77%68.2%±9.554%
Body16%59%68%64.6%±12.23% ▼
T30%62%72%62.8%±9.343% ▲

Optimal v Florian Mayer: +0.4±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Florian Mayer returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
FH through the middle54%+4.3−1.7+1.7+4.2±2.7
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+0.5+6.1+12.1±4.0
FH down the line15%+1.7−1.2+1.6+2.1±4.0
FH slice through the middle10%−4.2+0.8+1.7−1.7±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.1±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (99 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
BH through the middle39%+6.4±0.0+1.6+8.0±2.4
BH crosscourt33%+8.8−0.4+1.7+10.1±3.0
BH down the line13%+4.2+0.9+4.4+9.5±4.1
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.3−1.4−5.9±2.2
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5+1.1−2.2−0.6±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.1±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (85 returns charted)

Pedro Martinez returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FlorianValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3+2.1−1.6+4.8±2.8
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+1.1−2.8+3.9±4.3
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2+1.7+0.6−1.9±2.0
FH down the line12%+1.7+1.9+0.7+4.3±4.4
FH slice crosscourt8%−4.3+0.6±0.0−3.7±2.0

Lean FH through the middle: +2.0±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (426 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FlorianValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+2.2+0.2+8.7±2.6
BH crosscourt27%+8.8−3.4−1.9+3.5±3.3
BH down the line13%+4.2−0.4+2.2+6.0±4.2
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2−1.5−1.6−7.3±2.4
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−1.5+0.6−0.4±2.5

Lean BH through the middle: +4.7±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (517 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FlorianValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5+1.2+1.0−1.3±2.7
FH crosscourt37%−0.2−0.4+0.2−0.5±4.3
FH down the line10%−1.8+0.6−3.4−4.5±3.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.8±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (107 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FlorianValue
BH through the middle41%−2.9−0.2−0.7−3.8±2.4
BH crosscourt30%+1.0±0.0+2.7+3.6±3.2
BH down the line14%−0.2+5.2−2.4+2.6±4.8
FH inside-out7%+1.0−0.7−3.4−3.1±3.4
FH through the middle5%−2.9−0.7+1.0−2.6±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (340 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Florian Mayer

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+5.0±3.2+0.6+4.4
BH to their backhand · rally+4.6±3.4+2.2+2.4
FH to the middle · return+3.2±3.5+0.4+2.8
BH to their backhand · return+3.1±4.4+0.6+2.6
FH to their forehand · rally+0.7±4.1−0.7+1.4
FH to their backhand · rally−2.9±4.2−3.5+0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−2.9±4.2−3.5+0.6
FH to their forehand · rally+0.7±4.1−0.7+1.4
BH to their backhand · return+3.1±4.4+0.6+2.6
FH to the middle · return+3.2±3.5+0.4+2.8
BH to their backhand · rally+4.6±3.4+2.2+2.4

Pedro Martinez

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally+9.2±4.0+2.7+6.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1+5.7±5.2+0.2+5.5
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.8±4.9+0.8+3.0
FH to the middle · return+3.0±3.7+2.1+1.0
BH to the middle · return+2.1±3.1+1.8+0.3
FH to their backhand · rally+1.7±4.0+1.9−0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally+0.3±5.8+3.8−3.5
BH to their backhand · rally+0.9±3.6+0.5+0.4
FH to their backhand · rally+1.7±4.0+1.9−0.2
BH to the middle · return+2.1±3.1+1.8+0.3
FH to the middle · return+3.0±3.7+2.1+1.0

Against Pedro Martinez-like opponents

Florian Mayer vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–60.2%29.9%
Players most similar to Pedro Martinez1 47.4%33.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Lorenzo Musetti, Novak Djokovic, Marton Fucsovics, Roberto Bautista Agut, Nuno Borges, Robin Haase, Pablo Andujar, Filip Krajinovic, Philipp Kohlschreiber, Gaston Gaudio. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.