RallyIQ

Game plan

Jiri Vesely v David Nalbandian

Every number combines what Jiri Vesely does well with what David Nalbandian allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Jiri Vesely wins, best of 3 38%90%: 15%–67% · best of 5: 35%
Serve points won 63.2% / 65.6% Jiri / David · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 36%serve 63.0% / 65.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Jiri Vesely's record against David Nalbandian's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +4.1 on serve, +4.7 on return vs expectation (168 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerJiriDavid
Direction choice−0.03 ±0.09
better than 47%
+0.26 ±0.05
better than 97%
Shot selection+0.08 ±0.26
better than 63%
−0.29 ±0.09
better than 24%
Execution+0.24 ±0.93
better than 78%
+0.33 ±0.30
better than 79%
Points left on the table2.61 ±0.21
lower than 49%
2.02 ±0.09
lower than 99%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Jiri Vesely serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJiri winsv DavidMatchupOptimal
Wide39%81%73%81.1%±6.152% ▲
Body14%72%76%83.0%±7.414%
T47%71%75%71.6%±6.734% ▼

Optimal v David Nalbandian: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +6.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJiri winsv DavidMatchupOptimal
Wide44%74%71%72.9%±6.944%
Body17%75%60%72.5%±10.54% ▼
T39%81%74%82.8%±5.952% ▲

Optimal v David Nalbandian: +0.6±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

David Nalbandian serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDavid winsv JiriMatchupOptimal
Wide40%69%77%72.7%±6.753% ▲
Body13%63%65%64.9%±10.10% ▼
T48%71%75%70.7%±7.547%

Optimal v Jiri Vesely: +0.9±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDavid winsv JiriMatchupOptimal
Wide54%64%78%70.0%±7.946% ▼
Body5%63%64%64.4%±12.10% ▼
T41%70%71%69.1%±7.054% ▲

Optimal v Jiri Vesely: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Jiri Vesely returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DavidValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3+1.7+0.8+6.8±2.6
FH crosscourt25%+5.5−0.2+2.9+8.2±3.8
FH slice through the middle15%−4.2−0.7+1.3−3.6±2.2
FH down the line10%+1.7−1.7−0.5−0.5±3.7
FH slice crosscourt9%−4.3+2.5+1.8±0.0±2.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (134 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DavidValue
BH through the middle43%+6.4+0.1+1.6+8.0±2.3
BH crosscourt20%+8.8+1.4+5.8+16.0±3.4
BH down the line17%+4.2−0.2+2.6+6.6±3.8
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−0.7+1.7−3.2±2.1
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+0.2+2.3−5.9±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +9.0±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (192 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DavidValue
FH crosscourt53%−0.2+0.4−1.4−1.2±4.0
FH through the middle35%−3.5+2.0+1.1−0.4±2.4
FH slice crosscourt13%−12.5+0.2±0.0−12.3±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.1±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (40 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DavidValue
BH through the middle52%−2.9+1.4+0.7−0.9±2.1
BH crosscourt27%+1.0±0.0+0.3+1.3±2.9
BH down the line15%−0.2+0.2−1.7−1.7±3.7
BH slice through the middle6%−11.3+0.6+1.5−9.2±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (88 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

David Nalbandian returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JiriValue
FH through the middle38%+4.3−0.4−1.7+2.1±2.6
FH crosscourt30%+5.5−3.1−2.4+0.1±3.8
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.6−1.5−6.3±2.2
FH down the line10%+1.7−3.4−5.3−7.0±4.3
FH slice down the line6%−4.3+0.2−0.8−4.9±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +3.2±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (933 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JiriValue
BH crosscourt32%+8.8+1.0−0.9+8.9±2.9
BH through the middle26%+6.4+0.9+4.2+11.5±2.5
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2−0.6+0.7−4.1±2.3
BH slice crosscourt14%+0.5+0.8+0.4+1.7±2.5
BH down the line6%+4.2+1.8−1.3+4.7±4.5

Lean BH through the middle: +6.4±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (915 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JiriValue
FH crosscourt40%−0.2+0.5+0.1+0.4±4.0
FH through the middle35%−3.5−1.9+1.1−4.3±2.8
FH down the line16%−1.8−0.4+1.3−0.9±4.3
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7−0.1−2.1−14.9±1.7
FH slice down the line2%−9.4+0.9±0.0−8.5±1.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.6±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (324 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JiriValue
BH crosscourt60%+1.0+0.7−1.6+0.2±2.7
BH through the middle22%−2.9+0.1−3.4−6.1±2.3
BH down the line12%−0.2+1.7−1.2+0.3±4.7
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.0−2.3±0.0−6.3±1.7
FH through the middle2%−2.9−0.4+1.1−2.2±2.2

Lean BH down the line: +1.9±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (792 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Jiri Vesely

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+5.7±4.7+2.9+2.8
BH to their forehand · return+5.4±5.0+2.3+3.1
FH to the middle · return+4.2±3.2+3.0+1.2
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.3±4.9+3.8−2.5
BH to the middle · return+0.5±2.8−0.7+1.2
FH to their forehand · serve +1+0.3±4.5+0.9−0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−7.4±5.8−4.3−3.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1−5.3±4.1−3.1−2.2
BH to their forehand · rally−4.8±4.6−0.7−4.1
FH to their backhand · rally−4.6±3.6−2.2−2.3
BH to their forehand · return +1−4.5±6.2+0.3−4.9

David Nalbandian

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally+3.1±3.9−0.5+3.6
FH to their backhand · return +1+2.3±4.9+0.9+1.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1+0.7±4.6−0.1+0.8
BH slice to the middle · rally+0.3±3.0−0.1+0.4
BH to the middle · rally±0.0±2.0+0.4−0.4
BH to the middle · return−0.1±2.8+0.1−0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally−5.0±3.0+0.8−5.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1−3.6±4.2+0.7−4.3
BH to their forehand · rally−1.6±4.6−0.9−0.7
FH to their backhand · rally−1.0±3.6−0.4−0.7
FH to the middle · return−0.7±2.4−0.1−0.5

Against David Nalbandian-like opponents

Jiri Vesely vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.1%36.0%
Players most similar to David Nalbandian1 65.8%37.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Novak Djokovic, Richard Gasquet, Kei Nishikori, Andy Murray, Marcos Baghdatis, Nikolay Davydenko, Ivan Ljubicic, Marat Safin, Juan Carlos Ferrero. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.