RallyIQ

Game plan

Marin Cilic v Sam Querrey

Every number combines what Marin Cilic does well with what Sam Querrey allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Marin Cilic wins, best of 3 68%90%: 45%–86% · best of 5: 73%
Serve points won 69.3% / 65.3% Marin / Sam · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 54%serve 66.8% / 66.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Marin Cilic's record against Sam Querrey's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +12.1 on serve, +4.6 on return vs expectation (453 points); head-to-head: +14.1 on serve, +0.7 on return vs expectation (270 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMarinSam
Direction choice+0.14 ±0.05
better than 87%
+0.16 ±0.10
better than 89%
Shot selection+0.28 ±0.08
better than 78%
+0.50 ±0.22
better than 93%
Execution−1.01 ±0.32
better than 25%
−0.88 ±0.95
better than 28%
Points left on the table2.18 ±0.08
lower than 93%
2.35 ±0.18
lower than 79%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Marin Cilic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMarin winsv SamMatchupOptimal
Wide50%73%74%73.8%±4.641% ▼
Body4%58%62%56.7%±10.80% ▼
T46%80%79%84.1%±3.859% ▲

Optimal v Sam Querrey: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMarin winsv SamMatchupOptimal
Wide53%76%77%79.6%±4.566% ▲
Body7%63%70%69.8%±9.00% ▼
T40%76%74%77.3%±4.834% ▼

Optimal v Sam Querrey: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Sam Querrey serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSam winsv MarinMatchupOptimal
Wide46%76%74%76.9%±4.338% ▼
Body5%67%67%71.1%±10.50% ▼
T49%82%74%81.5%±4.162% ▲

Optimal v Marin Cilic: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSam winsv MarinMatchupOptimal
Wide51%81%76%83.5%±4.064% ▲
Body6%62%59%57.7%±11.70% ▼
T44%74%71%73.1%±5.136% ▼

Optimal v Marin Cilic: +1.0±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +6.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Marin Cilic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SamValue
FH through the middle54%+4.3−0.2−2.7+1.3±2.2
FH crosscourt24%+5.5−1.8+0.3+4.0±3.7
FH down the line21%+1.7−1.0−2.8−2.1±3.9
FH slice through the middle1%−4.2+1.3+2.9−0.1±2.2
FH slice crosscourt0%−4.3+0.1+1.3−2.9±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.7±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1630 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SamValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4±0.0−1.0+5.5±2.2
BH crosscourt31%+8.8−4.3−0.5+4.0±3.0
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−4.5+0.8−7.9±2.3
BH down the line8%+4.2+4.7+2.4+11.3±4.2
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−4.3+1.0−2.8±2.9

Lean BH down the line: +8.0±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (1619 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SamValue
FH through the middle51%−3.5±0.0+0.5−2.9±2.5
FH down the line26%−1.8+1.0−0.6−1.4±4.5
FH crosscourt23%−0.2−1.1+2.9+1.5±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.0±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (484 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SamValue
BH crosscourt48%+1.0−2.7±0.0−1.7±2.6
BH through the middle40%−2.9+0.3−1.3−3.9±2.0
BH down the line6%−0.2+0.5+0.4+0.7±4.9
FH inside-in2%+0.6+1.2+2.9+4.6±4.2
FH inside-out2%+1.0+0.7−0.6+1.1±3.5

Lean FH inside-in: +7.0±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (924 returns charted)

Sam Querrey returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3−0.5−1.4+2.3±2.2
FH crosscourt25%+5.5−0.7−1.4+3.4±3.8
FH down the line15%+1.7+0.8−1.6+0.9±3.9
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2±0.0+0.9−3.3±2.1
FH slice down the line4%−4.3+1.8+1.3−1.2±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.7±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (365 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4−1.0−0.5+4.9±2.2
BH crosscourt33%+8.8+0.9+1.5+11.2±3.0
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2+0.8±0.0−3.4±2.1
BH down the line9%+4.2+1.2+0.1+5.5±4.3
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−1.8+1.2−0.1±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.6±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (297 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
FH through the middle49%−3.5−1.1+0.8−3.7±2.4
FH crosscourt34%−0.2+0.8−1.5−1.0±4.0
FH down the line18%−1.8+0.1+1.0−0.7±3.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.3±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (80 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarinValue
BH crosscourt40%+1.0+2.0+0.2+3.2±2.6
BH through the middle37%−2.9−0.2−0.6−3.7±2.0
BH down the line19%−0.2−0.8+1.2+0.2±4.3
FH through the middle3%−2.9+0.7+0.8−1.3±1.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.4±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (179 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Marin Cilic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.9±2.9+0.5+2.3
BH to their forehand · rally+2.8±3.6−0.3+3.1
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.7±3.4−1.0+3.8
FH to their forehand · return+1.4±3.7−0.4+1.8
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.2±3.3−1.8+3.0
FH to their forehand · rally+0.8±2.3−2.4+3.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · serve +1−6.3±2.2−4.1−2.3
BH to their backhand · return−4.1±2.4−3.2−1.0
FH to their backhand · return−3.6±3.2−1.1−2.4
BH slice to their backhand · return−3.5±2.8−3.3−0.2
BH slice to the middle · return−3.3±2.3−3.7+0.4

Sam Querrey

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+2.3±4.5+1.1+1.2
BH to their backhand · return+1.2±2.1+1.8−0.6
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.2±2.6+1.5−0.3
BH to their backhand · return +1+0.9±2.6+0.1+0.8
BH to their forehand · return−0.1±3.8−0.3+0.2
BH to the middle · serve +1−0.2±2.2+0.3−0.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−2.6±3.3−2.4−0.2
BH to their backhand · serve +1−2.5±2.5−2.1−0.4
FH to the middle · return−2.3±1.8−1.8−0.6
FH to the middle · serve +1−2.1±2.2−2.7+0.6
BH to the middle · return−1.6±1.6+0.4−2.0

Against Sam Querrey-like opponents

Marin Cilic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.5%34.3%
Players most similar to Sam Querrey3 78.6%39.5%
Sam Querrey (charted head-to-head)1 80.8%35.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Joao Fonseca, Sebastian Korda, Alexei Popyrin, Zizou Bergs, Quentin Halys, Roman Safiullin, Lucas Pouille, Lloyd Harris, Jo Wilfried Tsonga. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head