RallyIQ

Game plan

Matteo Berrettini v Jo Wilfried Tsonga

Every number combines what Matteo Berrettini does well with what Jo Wilfried Tsonga allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Matteo Berrettini wins, best of 3 69%90%: 49%–85% · best of 5: 73%
Serve points won 69.6% / 65.5% Matteo / Jo · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 67%serve 69.7% / 66.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Matteo Berrettini's record against Jo Wilfried Tsonga's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −0.2 on serve, +1.5 on return vs expectation (1538 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMatteoJo
Direction choice−0.02 ±0.06
better than 51%
+0.19 ±0.05
better than 94%
Shot selection−0.61 ±0.09
better than 8%
+0.38 ±0.10
better than 85%
Execution+0.03 ±0.36
better than 70%
−0.52 ±0.35
better than 44%
Points left on the table2.71 ±0.09
lower than 39%
2.46 ±0.07
lower than 67%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Matteo Berrettini serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMatteo winsv JoMatchupOptimal
Wide46%79%75%80.0%±2.659% ▲
Body6%68%68%72.0%±6.30% ▼
T48%80%74%79.2%±2.741% ▼

Optimal v Jo Wilfried Tsonga: +0.5±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMatteo winsv JoMatchupOptimal
Wide50%79%72%77.9%±2.844% ▼
Body7%68%69%73.6%±6.30% ▼
T43%76%74%77.4%±3.256% ▲

Optimal v Jo Wilfried Tsonga: +0.4±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Jo Wilfried Tsonga serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJo winsv MatteoMatchupOptimal
Wide45%73%76%76.3%±2.939% ▼
Body7%61%65%62.7%±7.20% ▼
T48%80%75%80.3%±2.661% ▲

Optimal v Matteo Berrettini: +0.8±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJo winsv MatteoMatchupOptimal
Wide52%77%74%78.7%±2.865% ▲
Body5%63%65%65.6%±7.80% ▼
T42%75%71%73.6%±3.435% ▼

Optimal v Matteo Berrettini: +0.5±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Matteo Berrettini returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3−0.5+0.4+4.1±1.6
FH slice through the middle22%−4.2+1.2+0.4−2.5±1.9
FH down the line14%+1.7−4.0+1.4−0.9±3.4
FH crosscourt11%+5.5−1.3−2.1+2.1±3.5
FH slice crosscourt6%−4.3+2.1+0.1−2.1±2.8

Lean FH through the middle: +3.1±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1460 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoValue
BH through the middle31%+6.4+0.7−0.4+6.8±1.6
BH slice through the middle29%−4.2−0.5−2.3−7.0±1.6
BH crosscourt15%+8.8+0.1−0.9+8.0±2.5
BH slice crosscourt11%+0.5−1.5−0.4−1.4±2.4
BH down the line7%+4.2+1.7+0.7+6.7±3.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.8±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1842 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoValue
FH through the middle51%−3.5−1.8+0.6−4.6±2.2
FH down the line24%−1.8−1.3−2.0−5.1±4.1
FH crosscourt16%−0.2−3.0+0.1−3.2±4.1
FH slice through the middle6%−12.7+1.1±0.0−11.6±2.0
FH slice down the line2%−9.4±0.0−0.7−10.1±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.0±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (389 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9+0.2+0.6−2.1±1.4
BH crosscourt26%+1.0−1.2+0.2±0.0±2.0
BH down the line12%−0.2±0.0−0.8−1.0±4.1
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.2+0.6−2.0±2.0
FH inside-in3%+0.6−3.7+0.1−3.0±4.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.5±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1173 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Jo Wilfried Tsonga returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MatteoValue
FH through the middle36%+4.3−0.5−0.2+3.6±1.7
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−0.6+1.0+5.9±3.2
FH slice through the middle15%−4.2+1.3+0.7−2.3±1.7
FH down the line15%+1.7+0.9−1.2+1.4±3.5
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3−2.2±0.0−6.6±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.0±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1365 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MatteoValue
BH through the middle29%+6.4+0.7+1.0+8.2±1.6
BH crosscourt21%+8.8−0.3+1.5+9.9±2.3
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2+2.0−1.3−3.5±1.7
BH slice crosscourt14%+0.5+3.2−2.8+0.9±2.4
BH down the line9%+4.2+1.5−4.0+1.7±4.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.3±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (1899 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MatteoValue
FH crosscourt37%−0.2+1.4−0.5+0.7±3.9
FH through the middle33%−3.5−0.2−0.8−4.4±2.2
FH down the line16%−1.8±0.0±0.0−1.8±4.2
FH slice through the middle8%−12.7−1.4−1.3−15.4±2.2
FH slice down the line2%−9.4−2.0−0.6−12.0±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (345 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MatteoValue
BH through the middle29%−2.9−2.7−0.1−5.7±1.6
BH crosscourt28%+1.0±0.0−1.6−0.5±2.0
BH down the line9%−0.2−5.8+0.1−5.9±4.5
FH through the middle8%−2.9−1.2−0.8−4.8±1.9
FH inside-in8%+0.6−2.2−0.5−2.1±4.0
FH inside-out7%+1.0+1.1±0.0+2.1±3.2

Lean FH inside-out: +5.8±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1222 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Matteo Berrettini

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally+7.3±5.3+7.0+0.3
BH to their forehand · serve +1+4.9±4.2+3.3+1.6
FH volley to their backhand · rally+2.2±5.5+0.1+2.2
FH slice to the middle · return+2.1±1.8+1.5+0.7
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.0±1.5+0.9+0.1
BH to their backhand · return +1+1.0±2.1+0.9+0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally−7.2±5.5−2.8−4.4
BH slice to their forehand · rally−4.3±2.7−0.8−3.5
FH to their forehand · return−4.0±3.1−2.9−1.2
BH volley to their backhand · rally−3.8±5.5−0.1−3.7
BH to their forehand · rally−3.8±2.7−3.2−0.6

Jo Wilfried Tsonga

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · return +1+2.7±2.9+2.3+0.4
Smash to their forehand · rally+1.9±4.3+2.9−1.0
FH slice to the middle · return+1.1±1.7+0.3+0.9
BH slice to the middle · return+0.7±1.6+1.6−0.8
BH to the middle · rally−0.4±1.2+0.1−0.4
FH volley to their backhand · rally−0.4±5.7+1.2−1.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their backhand · rally−8.8±5.3−2.0−6.7
FH volley to their forehand · rally−8.1±5.1−5.6−2.5
BH volley to their forehand · rally−6.9±5.3−1.5−5.4
BH to their forehand · rally−6.8±2.4−3.8−3.1
FH to their backhand · return +1−5.1±2.4−0.5−4.6

Against Jo Wilfried Tsonga-like opponents

Matteo Berrettini vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.7%33.6%
Players most similar to Jo Wilfried Tsonga12 68.6%34.8%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Joao Fonseca, Hubert Hurkacz, Alexei Popyrin, Dominic Thiem, Lucas Pouille, Lloyd Harris, Kyle Edmund, Sam Querrey, Roger Federer, James Blake. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.