RallyIQ

Game plan

Rafael Nadal v Jarkko Nieminen

Every number combines what Rafael Nadal does well with what Jarkko Nieminen allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Rafael Nadal wins, best of 3 94%90%: 79%–99% · best of 5: 97%
Serve points won 67.1% / 54.9% Rafael / Jarkko · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 95%serve 68.6% / 55.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Rafael Nadal's record against Jarkko Nieminen's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.6 on serve, +0.7 on return vs expectation (11125 points); head-to-head: −2.9 on serve, +2.9 on return vs expectation (285 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerRafaelJarkko
Direction choice+0.02 ±0.03
better than 62%
−0.26 ±0.13
better than 8%
Shot selection+0.38 ±0.05
better than 85%
−0.02 ±0.27
better than 51%
Execution+1.32 ±0.10
better than 99%
+0.34 ±0.76
better than 80%
Points left on the table2.66 ±0.04
lower than 43%
3.24 ±0.24
lower than 12%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Rafael Nadal serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRafael winsv JarkkoMatchupOptimal
Wide31%75%71%73.1%±5.931%
Body18%64%61%62.4%±10.65% ▼
T51%69%81%76.7%±7.164% ▲

Optimal v Jarkko Nieminen: +0.8±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRafael winsv JarkkoMatchupOptimal
Wide54%71%78%76.4%±6.654%
Body18%67%67%70.1%±9.35% ▼
T28%75%77%79.4%±6.241% ▲

Optimal v Jarkko Nieminen: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Jarkko Nieminen serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJarkko winsv RafaelMatchupOptimal
Wide41%62%66%54.6%±8.142%
Body18%58%58%52.3%±9.75% ▼
T40%65%74%64.2%±7.153% ▲

Optimal v Rafael Nadal: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJarkko winsv RafaelMatchupOptimal
Wide52%59%71%57.5%±6.550% ▼
Body11%64%57%57.7%±11.20% ▼
T37%69%66%62.4%±8.350% ▲

Optimal v Rafael Nadal: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Rafael Nadal returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JarkkoValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3+0.4−1.3+3.3±2.2
FH crosscourt31%+5.5+2.4−5.3+2.6±3.2
FH down the line16%+1.7−0.8+1.9+2.7±3.5
FH slice through the middle3%−4.2+0.1+1.8−2.3±2.0
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+7.5±0.0+3.1±1.9
BH inside-out0%+6.3+1.4+2.6+10.4±3.9

Lean BH inside-out: +7.6±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (5711 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JarkkoValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4−0.2+1.9+8.1±2.1
BH crosscourt19%+8.8−1.2+1.3+8.9±2.6
BH slice through the middle17%−4.2+2.1+2.1±0.0±1.9
BH down the line15%+4.2+3.3+2.6+10.2±3.5
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+5.7+1.5−1.3±2.6

Lean BH down the line: +4.1±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (9039 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JarkkoValue
FH crosscourt48%−0.2+0.7−0.8−0.4±3.3
FH through the middle33%−3.5−2.6−1.8−7.9±2.3
FH down the line17%−1.8+3.8+0.7+2.8±4.0
BH inside-out1%+0.9+0.3−2.3−1.1±3.9
FH slice through the middle1%−12.7−0.2±0.0−12.8±1.3

Lean FH down the line: +5.2±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (2037 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JarkkoValue
BH through the middle35%−2.9+2.0−0.2−1.1±1.8
BH crosscourt28%+1.0−1.0+1.6+1.6±2.0
BH down the line17%−0.2+1.8−2.3−0.7±3.6
FH through the middle9%−2.9+1.2−1.8−3.4±2.0
FH inside-in8%+0.6+1.5−0.8+1.3±3.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.9±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (5854 returns charted)

Jarkko Nieminen returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RafaelValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3−3.4−0.9±0.0±2.3
FH down the line20%+1.7+1.5+1.7+4.9±3.2
FH crosscourt16%+5.5−1.8+0.1+3.7±3.2
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2+0.1±0.0−4.1±1.8
FH slice down the line4%−4.3+0.7+1.5−2.1±2.2

Lean FH down the line: +3.9±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (123 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RafaelValue
BH through the middle36%+6.4+0.1+0.7+7.1±2.1
BH slice through the middle20%−4.2+0.5+1.9−1.8±1.9
BH crosscourt20%+8.8−2.0−1.0+5.8±2.6
BH slice down the line9%−8.4+0.1+3.6−4.7±2.5
BH down the line8%+4.2+3.1+4.3+11.6±2.9

Lean BH through the middle: +3.4±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (153 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RafaelValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5−0.5−0.4−4.4±2.0
FH crosscourt28%−0.2+0.8+0.4+1.0±3.1
FH down the line28%−1.8+1.6−0.7−0.9±3.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.9±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (54 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RafaelValue
BH through the middle51%−2.9+1.7+0.1−1.1±1.9
BH crosscourt32%+1.0−1.1−1.3−1.4±2.5
BH down the line10%−0.2±0.0−0.2−0.4±3.0
FH through the middle7%−2.9+0.2−0.4−3.2±1.3

Lean BH through the middle: +0.2±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (101 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Rafael Nadal

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally+7.8±1.9+2.7+5.0
FH to their backhand · return +1+7.1±2.9+2.9+4.2
FH to their forehand · serve +1+6.7±2.8+1.6+5.0
FH to their forehand · rally+5.9±2.3+2.1+3.9
BH slice to the middle · return+5.3±1.9+3.1+2.2
FH to their forehand · return +1+4.8±3.2+0.9+3.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−5.8±3.5−1.2−4.7
FH to the middle · return−1.9±2.0+0.1−2.0
BH to the middle · rally−1.7±1.7+1.0−2.7
BH to their backhand · rally−1.1±2.2+1.2−2.3
FH to the middle · rally−0.4±1.8+0.1−0.4

Jarkko Nieminen

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+3.9±1.8+1.9+2.0
FH to their backhand · rally+2.9±2.2+1.5+1.4
BH to their forehand · return+2.3±3.4−0.7+3.1
BH to the middle · serve +1+1.9±2.0+1.0+0.9
BH to their forehand · rally+0.7±2.7−0.1+0.8
BH to their forehand · return +1+0.5±3.7−0.2+0.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return−4.4±2.0−3.4−0.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1−3.4±2.7−3.7+0.3
BH to the middle · rally−2.4±1.5−2.3±0.0
FH to their forehand · rally−2.0±2.4−0.5−1.4
BH to their backhand · rally−1.8±1.9−0.9−0.9

Against Jarkko Nieminen-like opponents

Rafael Nadal vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.0%40.1%
Players most similar to Jarkko Nieminen67 61.4%38.5%
Jarkko Nieminen (charted head-to-head)2 65.7%47.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Valentin Vacherot, Novak Djokovic, Karen Khachanov, Alex Michelsen, Kei Nishikori, Mikhail Kukushkin, Denis Istomin, Viktor Troicki, Nikolay Davydenko. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head